3,575 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Dec 22, 2018 23:15:28 GMT
Not at all my normal type of film but I went to see this, both to see what all the fuss was about (though it is a VERY thin week for film releases) and in case it turned out to be something I wouldn't have wanted to miss.
Well, I'm still not sure why so many people are so ecstatic (let alone why grown men are weeping over it) and it would have been missable but I suppose it was pretty much as I expected, ie horribly Disneyfied and sentimental but very well done if you like, or can endure that type of thing. I'd have preferred it to be a bit shorter and to lose the hideous animated sequences but if there had to be a cheeky Cockney chappie, Lin-Manuel Miranda was an improvement on Dick Van Dyke - and as has been noted, the former managed a more authentic accent.
It felt bizarrely like another Paddington film, what with Julie Andrews, Ben Whishaw (I know he did a voiceover only for the last Paddington film), the setting (another upmarket west London suburb) and the pantomime villain. Still, I am sure it will be very popular and I have certainly satisfied my curiousity.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2018 12:21:16 GMT
I have a confession. I had never seen the original Mary Poppins until Friday.
According to my best friend I am “literally the last person of our generation to discover “Let’s Go Fly a Kite” is from Poppins.”
Anyway, Mary Poppins Returns is pitch perfect. It’s better paced than the original and has more light and shade. I cried! Will be going to see this again before the new year!
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Dec 23, 2018 17:51:39 GMT
Just settling down to watch it again! The joy of a Limitless card...
|
|
|
Post by catcat100 on Dec 23, 2018 19:05:58 GMT
Saw this on Friday Afternoon and really really enjoyed it.
Took a bit of time to get used to Emily Blunt's Mary (which is a bit of a surprise really as I do have a 'bit of a thing' for Emily) but once there thought she was spectacularly good as was the rest of the cast.
They've kept a lot of the spirit of the first film but really brought it up to present day standards. All the song and dance numbers were great. It really did wizz by and was surprised it came in at over two hours.
The kids around me all seemed to enjoy it.
Think I might have to go see it again.
|
|
3,572 posts
|
Post by Rory on Dec 23, 2018 20:26:32 GMT
Agree with all of the above but whilst I generally like Emily Blunt, I thought she lacked the warmth of Julie Andrews. Hard to compete with her I know. Bit more yin needed to go with the yang of clipped propriety. However that was probably how Travers wrote the character. And also thought Lin-Manuel Miranda was slightly miscast even though he was very good. Two lovely cameos at the end, excluding a blink or you'll miss it one from David Haig, in presumably what was a bit of a nod to the stage show. All in all though I thought it was utterly charming festive fare and a hugely welcome relief from the tedium of what's going on in the world.
|
|
5,837 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Dec 23, 2018 20:27:16 GMT
I was thoroughly charmed and quite frequently moved by it.
Tears on at least 3 occasions!
Musically astute with nods to the original and other Disney scores. Visually well put together. Again with good references to a wide range of other Disney classics (as well as the original novels)
I thought it was all strong other than the motivation for Colin Firth's character. But all in all, a lovely way to spend 2 hours.
|
|
5,177 posts
|
Post by Being Alive on Dec 25, 2018 0:48:24 GMT
Went back for a second viewing and just loved it all over again.
They really have got it right with this - I’m pleased Rob Marshall showed he really cared about what they were doing in making this (you can see how much care was taken!)
Emily Blunt is an absolute delight, but in fairness so are the whole cast. Ben Whishaw got me more second time round, and I still think enough people aren’t talking about Emily Mortimer - thought she was wonderful. Also, if Dick Van Dyke and Angela Lansbury’s appearances don’t make you smile (or cry) with joy, then you’re dead inside.
Cried again, at the opening credits (because of how similar to the originals they are!), at Trip A Little Light, and at the end.
I’ll keep going back to the cinema and watch this for weeks - it’s just the joy we all need right now.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2018 23:04:05 GMT
I thought this was wonderful, utterly charming.
My fears about Emily Blunt's accent from the trailer were unfounded, I thought she was fabulous. Just the right amount of authority and hint of sass without being a carbon copy of Julie Andrews.
Lin-Manuel Miranda sang and acted well and was so charming that I can forgive the little slips in the accent (even with those he was miles better on that front than Dick van Dyke!).
I thought Emily Mortimer and Ben Wishaw were both great, as were all the children. Julie Walters was her usual funny self. Meryl Streep was a bit too over the top for me, but she sang it well enough.
Colin Fifth was the disappointment for me, but it's a thankless role. I struggled to make out Dick van Dyke's dialogue but it was still good to see him make an appearance, and the great Angela Lansbury simply stole the show.
I thought the score was delightful and the plot worked perfectly to give enough nods to the original while not feeling like a carbon copy. The 2 hours flew by.
I do think that this is a film more for adults than children though - there is such nostalgia for the original and some parts of it I suspect would go over young kids' heads. But if the screening I attended is anything to go by, it is attracting that adult audience anyway.
|
|
4,983 posts
|
Post by Someone in a tree on Dec 28, 2018 18:21:58 GMT
Absolutely loved this. A very excellent tribute to the original yet different enough to make it a sequel (if that makes any sense). But more importantly I found it to be thoroughly enchanting throughout and teary eyed at the end.
|
|
587 posts
|
Post by Polly1 on Dec 28, 2018 21:10:28 GMT
OK, so I have had an almost Pavlovian response to Feed The Birds since age 5, but I started crying at the opening credits and continued more or less all the way through! A couple of overtly sentimental moments but generally pitched just spot on with lovely nods to the original. Meryl Streep was wonderful, loved the joke about her accent. Karen Dotrice! (more crying). Just wish Julie Andrews could have been persuaded to put in even the briefest of appearances. I hope today's kids get as much pleasure from this as we did from the original, but somehow I doubt it.
|
|
587 posts
|
Post by Polly1 on Dec 29, 2018 9:22:51 GMT
PS. I would love to know how much Royal Doulton had to pay to get so many name checks - especially in the song lyrics!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2018 10:09:06 GMT
Just wish Julie Andrews could have been persuaded to put in even the briefest of appearances. It would have been the icing on the cake but Dame Julie was adamant right from the start that she loved Emily Blunt and thought she was perfect for it and that she felt that if she was in it even for the briefest moment that it would detract from Emily and she believed the film should be Emily's show completely. Now *that* is a class act people.
|
|
7,176 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Jon on Dec 29, 2018 11:34:32 GMT
If anyone wants Julie Andrews in a movie this Christmas, she’s in Aquaman!
|
|
653 posts
|
Post by ptwest on Dec 29, 2018 14:48:09 GMT
Just in from seeing this in Sheffield. Absolutely loved it. About 8 of us in the imax though. But what a wonderfully done film. Have never been a fan of the original but loved the stage version so wondered how I would take to this- I needn’t have worried!
|
|
379 posts
|
Post by ctas on Dec 29, 2018 15:31:44 GMT
For me, this didn’t quite have the magic I was really hoping for. There was something a little off (and not just the americanisms in the script) and I enjoyed it a lot but still felt a little underwhelmed when I left. My favourite parts were hearing the original songs in the orchestration, and I enjoyed the animated sequences a lot!
|
|
3,572 posts
|
Post by Rory on Dec 29, 2018 16:25:22 GMT
If anyone wants Julie Andrews in a movie this Christmas, she’s in Aquaman! I would have loved her back as Mary Poppins never mind a cameo!
|
|
369 posts
|
Post by Jonnyboy on Dec 29, 2018 17:57:05 GMT
If anyone wants Julie Andrews in a movie this Christmas, she’s in Aquaman! I would have loved her back as Mary Poppins never mind a cameo! She wouldn’t have been as good as Blunt! Just out of the cinema. What a treat it all was!
|
|
|
Post by talkingheads on Dec 29, 2018 18:58:47 GMT
Just got back, that was absolutely delightful. Real old school Disney, I had a huge grin on my face from the opening credits. I will say I wasn't sure of Blunt at first, but I fell in love with her during the theatre song and dance number, she was absolutely Mary Poppins after that. I will be seeing this again in the cinema.
|
|
98 posts
|
Post by haz23 on Dec 29, 2018 19:02:56 GMT
I thought it was just lovely, a real fresh take on this beloved character and the story that went with it.
Emily was a practically perfect Mary Poppins but Lin stole it for me - he was charming and it was nice to see a fun side of him.
Go see it!
|
|
|
Post by crabtree on Dec 29, 2018 19:12:14 GMT
so how did Michael have the snow globe, when Mary packed it away in her carpet bag as she left all those years ago. Not nit picking as I loved the film, especially seeing karen dotrice.
|
|
447 posts
|
Post by tr252 on Dec 31, 2018 19:25:18 GMT
Just back from the cinema after seeing this - absolutely wonderful! It was the right balance of nostalgic and new, for me. I thought Emily Blunt was a great Mary Poppins (complete goosebumps at her entrance and then again, with teary eyes, as she flew away and looked over her shoulder) and I loved Lin Manuel Miranda.
I'm definitely going back to see this again in the cinema. Trip A Little Light Fantastic is a bit of a tune isn't it?!
|
|
|
Post by jaqs on Dec 31, 2018 19:44:41 GMT
I wanted to clap after Light Fantastic. And others did clap at the end when I saw it Boxing Day.
However my god the storyline is depressing as depressing can be.
|
|
|
Post by catcat100 on Jan 1, 2019 0:36:44 GMT
2nd viewing today and its got better. You see the detail that they've gone to and you're starting to sing along in your head to some of the songs. You have already got used to Emily's accent and she's so much more her own Mary. Lin's and Dick's accent still aren't quite right but hey you don't watch Mary Poppins for its gritty realism. Appreciated Meryl's piece so much more the second time.
|
|
|
Post by justfran on Jan 1, 2019 18:27:37 GMT
I agree with all of the praise being heaped on this film, it was delightful. Straight from the opening credits with those lovely paintings, it was just a great feel-good film. I agree with oxfordsimon the motivation for Colin Firth’s character wanting the house wasn’t clear (unless I missed something?) but that’s a minor quibble. Lin-Manuel was very charming and the star of the film for me was Ben Whishaw. He just has something magical about him and his eyes are so expressive, A Conversation was such a moving song. Light Fantastic was indeed fantastic, great dancing. Can’t wait to see it again!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2019 7:02:02 GMT
LMM and Emily Blunt were wonderful. The film is similar to Mary Poppins the Musical. It works as a whole but its a bit too long
|
|