221 posts
|
Post by eulenspiegel on Nov 20, 2021 15:29:20 GMT
Saw the show this evening - 20 minutes late going up due to a technical fault. Some good tunes, some good moments but mostly a mess. Ticked off the list now anyhow!! She and the audiance thought otherwise -yesterday http://instagram.com/p/CWgCvo4K09h
|
|
131 posts
|
Post by critchyboy on Nov 20, 2021 17:01:16 GMT
And life would be boring if we all thought the same.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2021 17:11:07 GMT
Saw the show this evening - 20 minutes late going up due to a technical fault. Some good tunes, some good moments but mostly a mess. Ticked off the list now anyhow!! She and the audiance thought otherwise -yesterday http://instagr.am/p/CWgCvo4K09h And? It's called an opinion. Everyone has a different one.
|
|
118 posts
|
Post by rosscoe on Nov 20, 2021 17:49:50 GMT
Final show of my trip : just got a front row seat at the box office for 30 pounds. Finger crossed for this one. 😀
|
|
1,747 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by marob on Nov 22, 2021 7:51:10 GMT
Just put the TV on while I had my breakfast and saw the Breaking News ticker on Good Morning Britain mentions the gala tonight. Slow new day?
|
|
|
Post by sph on Nov 22, 2021 10:22:40 GMT
The most common reaction to the dramatic moment in the finale of Blood Brothers has always been laughter. I've seen it a couple of times and to be honest, I believe the main reason for laughter at this point is that the gunshots make people jump so violently that they then collectively laugh at themselves for jumping. It's one of my biggest bugbears with the show, as it really spoils the moment. They should use recorded gunshots that sound realistic but aren't as loud and sharp, or at least find some sort of prop gun that doesn't have such an explosive discharge.
|
|
|
Post by stagebyte on Nov 22, 2021 11:31:55 GMT
Just put the TV on while I had my breakfast and saw the Breaking News ticker on Good Morning Britain mentions the gala tonight. Slow new day? Is anyone on the board going tonight who has seen it before? Can’t wait to hear what they’ve changed. And who is playing Cinderella tonight?
|
|
|
Post by hannechalk on Nov 22, 2021 14:12:12 GMT
The most common reaction to the dramatic moment in the finale of Blood Brothers has always been laughter. I've seen it a couple of times and to be honest, I believe the main reason for laughter at this point is that the gunshots make people jump so violently that they then collectively laugh at themselves for jumping. It's one of my biggest bugbears with the show, as it really spoils the moment. They should use recorded gunshots that sound realistic but aren't as loud and sharp, or at least find some sort of prop gun that doesn't have such an explosive discharge. The have now made Linda's scream of anguish more prolonged and louder, which seems to suppress the giggles.
|
|
620 posts
|
Post by chernjam on Nov 23, 2021 2:19:16 GMT
Guess no one was there to report from the "gala"?
|
|
|
Post by cezbear on Nov 23, 2021 7:46:44 GMT
Minimal changes, not a 'revised version' as has been reported. A number of line changes, mostly to tighten it up/make the story a little clearer. Cinderella's soliloquy has been cut down quite a bit, for the better. Carrie was on, though you wouldn't know it from the lack of her appearing in any photos. ALW & Malala did a speech at the beginning, auctioned off some artwork & a video about the charity was shown. Goody bags & champagne for all.
|
|
|
Post by stagebyte on Nov 23, 2021 8:20:34 GMT
A number of line changes, mostly to tighten it up/make the story a little clearer. There must be loads of those then - the story made little sense. I wonder if they employed a dramaturg or if Fennel was employed at great expense to fix the mess? Main ones for me: What did they do with the evaporating godmother storyline? The be back at midnight foreboding line? The handing over of the necklace to the prince so easily? The bit where Cinders comes back for the forgotten shoe. The weird storyline that goes nowhere with the Queen and the stepmother. The unnecessary reprise of the Queen’s song? The cringey lyrics in Bad Cinderella, the hilarious rape joke? Did it affect the running time?
|
|
|
Post by cezbear on Nov 23, 2021 8:27:03 GMT
A number of line changes, mostly to tighten it up/make the story a little clearer. There must be loads of those then - the story made little sense. I wonder if they employed a dramaturg or if Fennel was employed at great expense to fix the mess? Main ones for me: What did they do with the evaporating godmother storyline? The be back at midnight foreboding line? The handing over of the necklace to the prince so easily? The bit where Cinders comes back for the forgotten shoe. The weird storyline that goes nowhere with the Queen and the stepmother. The unnecessary reprise of the Queen’s song? The cringey lyrics in Bad Cinderella, the hilarious rape joke? Did it affect the running time? Literally none of those things were changed, to my surprise. More to do with emphasising the town's business, I think. Basically it's not a re-write but to be fair no one ever actually said it would be other than a rumour in an article. The changes are minor, of the sort you'd expect to happen in previews. There's no 'fix'/big re-write here and none of the obvious changes were made. With that said, everyone seemed to enjoy it greatly, and I even managed to not completely dislike Carrie (who sounded a little strained in places).
|
|
|
Post by stagebyte on Nov 23, 2021 8:34:39 GMT
Literally none of those things were changed, to my surprise. More to do with emphasising the town's business, I think. Basically it's not a re-write but to be fair no one ever actually said it would be other than a rumour in an article. The changes are minor, of the sort you'd expect to happen in previews. There's no 'fix'/big re-write here and none of the obvious changes were made. With that said, everyone seemed to enjoy it greatly, and I even managed to not completely dislike Carrie (who sounded a little strained in places). Thanks for replying So bizarre the major stuff that didn’t make sense wasn’t fixed Although maybe at this point with 5 star reviews in the bag and egos at stake he was never going to ask for a complete rewrite - who knows? The main criticisms online seem to be similar across the board - it’s a mess - but what to do we know we don’t possess Oscars for our writing. So glad the interminable Cinderella Megamix went. It was such an obvious filler and jarring in the show.
|
|
3,347 posts
|
Post by Dr Tom on Nov 23, 2021 8:37:07 GMT
I can give you a few quick thoughts from last night.
I won the lottery draw, so ended up in one of the £25 seats near the back of the Circle. The view is fine and I think there were a lot more lottery winners than usual last night. Otherwise, it was pretty full.
I arrived quite late and straight from work, so not quite in the finery of many of the others. Very tight security around the theatre with road closures, plenty of police and wand searches.
Lots of celebrities, but mostly of the type of person who looks vaguely familiar but I couldn't quite name. Plus other people who wanted to be seen. I did spot (I believe) two Pussycat Dolls (not together) and managed to narrowly avoid crashing into Barry Humphries on two different levels of the theatre!
Apparently there was free champagne but I totally missed it.
The show started with a video, then a speech from Andrew (who called this show the real opening night), then from Malala (very well received). This was followed by a charity auction with two Sotheby's auctioneers for a painting by Shamsia Hassani (Afghanistan's answer to Banksy) which went for £21,000. I don't know much about art and I didn't have a spare £21,000 (or more) in my wallet but somehow I think the buyer got a bargain there!
As for the show, I thought it felt tighter and I noticed a few line cuts (but also some jokes that were either new, or just no one had laughed at before). But nothing majorly different from when I last saw this a few weeks ago. I believe all the leads were on, but I couldn't get close enough to a cast board to check.
There was a nice touch as well with a goodie bag (specially printed) including a programme with a special sticker, a poster, a pen and details of how to donate further. With not all the seats being filled at the back I did notice a few people amassing quite a collection of these, so do check out eBay soon if you like this type of thing,
I missed the champagne, but based on the number of people who got up during the show many others didn't. From the Circle, I could also see a record number of phone lights (some dimmer than others), plus people taking photos, but they may well have been celebrities. The ushers did have their work cut out.
It did feel like a successful and special night!
|
|
|
Post by stagebyte on Nov 23, 2021 8:41:22 GMT
I can give you a few quick thoughts from last night. I won the lottery draw, so ended up in one of the £25 seats near the back of the Circle. The view is fine and I think there were a lot more lottery winners than usual last night. Otherwise, it was pretty full. I arrived quite late and straight from work, so not quite in the finery of many of the others. Very tight security around the theatre with road closures, plenty of police and wand searches. Lots of celebrities, but mostly of the type of person who looks vaguely familiar but I couldn't quite name. Plus other people who wanted to be seen. I did spot (I believe) two Pussycat Dolls (not together) and managed to narrowly avoid crashing into Barry Humphries on two different levels of the theatre! Apparently there was free champagne but I totally missed it. The show started with a video, then a speech from Andrew (who called this show the real opening night), then from Malala (very well received). This was followed by a charity auction with two Sotheby's auctioneers for a painting by Shamsia Hassani (Afghanistan's answer to Banksy) which went for £21,000. I don't know much about art and I didn't have a spare £21,000 (or more) in my wallet but somehow I think the buyer got a bargain there! As for the show, I thought it felt tighter and I noticed a few line cuts (but also some jokes that were either new, or just no one had laughed at before). But nothing majorly different from when I last saw this a few weeks ago. I believe all the leads were on, but I couldn't get close enough to a cast board to check. There was a nice touch as well with a goodie bag (specially printed) including a programme with a special sticker, a poster, a pen and details of how to donate further. With not all the seats being filled at the back I did notice a few people amassing quite a collection of these, so do check out eBay soon if you like this type of thing, I missed the champagne, but based on the number of people who got up during the show many others didn't. From the Circle, I could also see a record number of phone lights (some dimmer than others), plus people taking photos, but they may well have been celebrities. The ushers did have their work cut out. It did feel like a successful and special night! Glad you had a good night. It’s a great cause. I’m so curious as to what lines were deemed cuttable? Can you remember-ish?
|
|
|
Post by stagebyte on Nov 23, 2021 8:42:11 GMT
I can give you a few quick thoughts from last night. I won the lottery draw, so ended up in one of the £25 seats near the back of the Circle. The view is fine and I think there were a lot more lottery winners than usual last night. Otherwise, it was pretty full. I arrived quite late and straight from work, so not quite in the finery of many of the others. Very tight security around the theatre with road closures, plenty of police and wand searches. Lots of celebrities, but mostly of the type of person who looks vaguely familiar but I couldn't quite name. Plus other people who wanted to be seen. I did spot (I believe) two Pussycat Dolls (not together) and managed to narrowly avoid crashing into Barry Humphries on two different levels of the theatre! Apparently there was free champagne but I totally missed it. The show started with a video, then a speech from Andrew (who called this show the real opening night), then from Malala (very well received). This was followed by a charity auction with two Sotheby's auctioneers for a painting by Shamsia Hassani (Afghanistan's answer to Banksy) which went for £21,000. I don't know much about art and I didn't have a spare £21,000 (or more) in my wallet but somehow I think the buyer got a bargain there! As for the show, I thought it felt tighter and I noticed a few line cuts (but also some jokes that were either new, or just no one had laughed at before). But nothing majorly different from when I last saw this a few weeks ago. I believe all the leads were on, but I couldn't get close enough to a cast board to check. There was a nice touch as well with a goodie bag (specially printed) including a programme with a special sticker, a poster, a pen and details of how to donate further. With not all the seats being filled at the back I did notice a few people amassing quite a collection of these, so do check out eBay soon if you like this type of thing, I missed the champagne, but based on the number of people who got up during the show many others didn't. From the Circle, I could also see a record number of phone lights (some dimmer than others), plus people taking photos, but they may well have been celebrities. The ushers did have their work cut out. It did feel like a successful and special night! Glad you had a good night. It’s a great cause. I’m so curious as to what lines were deemed cuttable? Can you remember-ish? Was Baz in? 😉
|
|
3,347 posts
|
Post by Dr Tom on Nov 23, 2021 9:11:52 GMT
I'm not good with lines, especially as I saw this at the first preview and there have been some small changes along the way, so I wouldn't like to say exactly what changed and when. But they've cut the Godmother's lines a bit since I last saw this. They've also increased the importance of the necklace and midnight, but that occurred earlier in the run. The plot still doesn't make all that much sense, but they're working with what they have.
I didn't spot Baz, but the landing type level was so packed with people mingling it was very hard to tell (it was even a bit of a struggle to get through the masses to the gents).
|
|
|
Post by Oliver on Nov 23, 2021 12:33:19 GMT
Making big changes to a through composed musical is far more problematic than a traditional book musical. You can end up seriously damaging the structural integrity of the music, and I would much rather that remains intact than that they make the story better but sacrifice the former. The music is the most important thing of all to me. People talk as if you can just rearrange things, cut things out, put things in, without any consequences. I'm pleased to hear that the changes have been minimal. I find that when they interfere with things they usually make it less good.
|
|
5,877 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on Nov 23, 2021 12:33:48 GMT
What’s the running time for this?
|
|
|
Post by stagebyte on Nov 23, 2021 12:57:04 GMT
Making big changes to a through composed musical is far more problematic than a traditional book musical. You can end up seriously damaging the structural integrity of the music, and I would much rather that remains intact than that they make the story better but sacrifice the former. The music is the most important thing of all to me. People talk as if you can just rearrange things, cut things out, put things in, without any consequences. I'm pleased to hear that the changes have been minimal. I find that when they interfere with things they usually make it less good. It’s strange but Cinderella very much presents as a traditional musical with dialogue song dialogue song rather than ‘through composed’ in the way Les Mis is for example. I agree the music is important but if the story is nonsense you cease to listen while you’re trying to make sense of the enormous plot holes? Either way I agree that’s it’s far too late to change anything substantial at this stage. Previews should only be for tiny changes. The work to the script should’ve been done way back before it even saw a sniff of an audience.
|
|
1,482 posts
|
Post by steve10086 on Nov 23, 2021 13:13:03 GMT
You can end up seriously damaging the structural integrity of the music… I don’t think there’s much danger of that happening with Cinderella
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2021 13:15:58 GMT
It's hardly a 'through composed' musical as you call it, definitely not in the way that Aspects is. It's very much a stop start kind of show and they could easily make changes by cutting stuff. Man's Man, Hunks Song, any of the many reprises all could be shortened or cut with very little changes to the music and zero difference to the plot.
|
|
|
Post by cezbear on Nov 23, 2021 13:19:39 GMT
It's hardly a 'through composed' musical as you call it, definitely not in the way that Aspects is. It's very much a stop start kind of show and they could easily make changes by cutting stuff. Man's Man, Hunks Song, any of the many reprises all could be shortened or cut with very little changes to the music and zero difference to the plot.
I would take great issue with any cuts to Man's Man!
|
|
|
Post by Oliver on Nov 23, 2021 13:46:39 GMT
It's hardly a 'through composed' musical as you call it, definitely not in the way that Aspects is. It's very much a stop start kind of show and they could easily make changes by cutting stuff. Man's Man, Hunks Song, any of the many reprises all could be shortened or cut with very little changes to the music and zero difference to the plot. It's fundamentally through composed though you're right that there is more dialogue than in some of his other shows. I love Man's Man, I think it's a wonderful song, but of course you will want everything cut that you personally don't like, it's human nature I guess.
|
|
1,747 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by marob on Nov 23, 2021 14:28:29 GMT
I don’t get the ongoing confusion about the Godmother and midnight, it’s a comment on women’s beauty/fashion industry, as stated again and again in Beauty Has a Price:
|
|