|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 10:56:01 GMT
A day late but yesterday was 'Equal Pay day' the day after which comparatively women stop being paid for the rest of the year in comparison with men.
Now before anyone comes in with the usual arguments: it's an average, it means across the board for comparable jobs, and it takes into account the number of women in senior positions comparative to men.
So while say, in the University sector where pay scales are regulated, then yes people doing identical jobs are paid roughly the same (everyone's varies slightly due to length of service etc but within 'bands' of pay). BUT at the top level there are comparatively less women than men in senior positions so women are of course being paid less overall.
In the private sector (so I understand, having never worked there myself) it's much more of a 'free for all' in terms of pay, especially in certain industries like banking. Whereby women sat next to a man doing the same job are often paid less.
Anyway at both ends, in 2018 it's a shocking state of affairs.
|
|
|
Post by asfound on Nov 10, 2018 12:31:09 GMT
A day late but yesterday was 'Equal Pay day' the day after which comparatively women stop being paid for the rest of the year in comparison with men. Now before anyone comes in with the usual arguments: it's an average, it means across the board for comparable jobs, and it takes into account the number of women in senior positions comparative to men. So while say, in the University sector where pay scales are regulated, then yes people doing identical jobs are paid roughly the same (everyone's varies slightly due to length of service etc but within 'bands' of pay). BUT at the top level there are comparatively less women than men in senior positions so women are of course being paid less overall. In the private sector (so I understand, having never worked there myself) it's much more of a 'free for all' in terms of pay, especially in certain industries like banking. Whereby women sat next to a man doing the same job are often paid less. Anyway at both ends, in 2018 it's a shocking state of affairs. I think the only thing shocking about this is that supposedly intelligent people are buying into spurious, misleading statistics to push this fake news agenda. I mean this "pay gap" has been debunked and dismissed by statisticians, economists, even feminist scholars. It takes into account barely a fraction of the complex factors which could potentially account for the earnings gap. Now I know perfectly well why the myth persists. Beyond the inconsequential, the naive, the gullible types who run along with any cause to feel like part of something, this is a way for middle class women in management and senior positions to leverage pay rises. This is obvious due to which roles, which positions, and which class of society gets all the focus. And to be fair good luck to them, after all people have used far more spurious and disingenuous tactics to get more money out of companies. But don't expect anyone with a modicum of statistical literacy to swallow this particular flavour of kool aid, because I'd no more go along with this narrative then I would climate change denial or intelligent design.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 13:37:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 14:11:54 GMT
There needs to be an updated Godwin's Law - the first person in a debate to say "fake news" automatically and immediately loses.
|
|
584 posts
|
Post by princeton on Nov 10, 2018 14:13:04 GMT
Here's some more clearly misleading statistics which were published this week by House of Commons Library (it references the ONS report as part of its evidence base). It focusses on the gender pay gap and not the more complex issue of equal pay - which, largely due to a lack of transparency amongst employers, is more difficult to quantify. researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN07068
|
|
1,127 posts
|
Post by samuelwhiskers on Nov 10, 2018 16:26:33 GMT
A day late but yesterday was 'Equal Pay day' the day after which comparatively women stop being paid for the rest of the year in comparison with men. Now before anyone comes in with the usual arguments: it's an average, it means across the board for comparable jobs, and it takes into account the number of women in senior positions comparative to men. So while say, in the University sector where pay scales are regulated, then yes people doing identical jobs are paid roughly the same (everyone's varies slightly due to length of service etc but within 'bands' of pay). BUT at the top level there are comparatively less women than men in senior positions so women are of course being paid less overall. In the private sector (so I understand, having never worked there myself) it's much more of a 'free for all' in terms of pay, especially in certain industries like banking. Whereby women sat next to a man doing the same job are often paid less. Anyway at both ends, in 2018 it's a shocking state of affairs. I think the only thing shocking about this is that supposedly intelligent people are buying into spurious, misleading statistics to push this fake news agenda. I mean this "pay gap" has been debunked and dismissed by statisticians, economists, even feminist scholars. It takes into account barely a fraction of the complex factors which could potentially account for the earnings gap. Now I know perfectly well why the myth persists. Beyond the inconsequential, the naive, the gullible types who run along with any cause to feel like part of something, this is a way for middle class women in management and senior positions to leverage pay rises. This is obvious due to which roles, which positions, and which class of society gets all the focus. And to be fair good luck to them, after all people have used far more spurious and disingenuous tactics to get more money out of companies. But don't expect anyone with a modicum of statistical literacy to swallow this particular flavour of kool aid, because I'd no more go along with this narrative then I would climate change denial or intelligent design. Oh do be quiet, dear. The grownups are talking.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2018 16:57:32 GMT
There needs to be an updated Godwin's Law - the first person in a debate to say "fake news" automatically and immediately loses. That would thoroughly screw up any discussion about Donald Trump.
|
|
|
Post by asfound on Nov 11, 2018 10:59:34 GMT
I think the only thing shocking about this is that supposedly intelligent people are buying into spurious, misleading statistics to push this fake news agenda. I mean this "pay gap" has been debunked and dismissed by statisticians, economists, even feminist scholars. It takes into account barely a fraction of the complex factors which could potentially account for the earnings gap. Now I know perfectly well why the myth persists. Beyond the inconsequential, the naive, the gullible types who run along with any cause to feel like part of something, this is a way for middle class women in management and senior positions to leverage pay rises. This is obvious due to which roles, which positions, and which class of society gets all the focus. And to be fair good luck to them, after all people have used far more spurious and disingenuous tactics to get more money out of companies. But don't expect anyone with a modicum of statistical literacy to swallow this particular flavour of kool aid, because I'd no more go along with this narrative then I would climate change denial or intelligent design. Oh do be quiet, dear. The grownups are talking. Purge the echo chamber!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2018 11:10:45 GMT
Oh do be quiet, dear. The grownups are talking. Purge the echo chamber! Not an echo chamber, just some informed intelligent people talking based on facts. Contrastingly, I had a very productive chat on twitter yesterday with an acquaintance who first doubted the gender pay gap, who then listened, read some articles and said he'd gone away informed. That, is how the grown ups do it.
|
|
|
Post by asfound on Nov 11, 2018 11:17:35 GMT
They are using the misnomer pay gap because that is the jargon perpetuated by activists and the media but the content and analysis of that report actually supports my point e.g. See Fig 3 and 4 and compare management/senior role gap to the 2016 report also in regards to your last comment. Which is why I find this official day when women are supposedly "working for free for the rest of the year" so ridiculous. It is not just dubious stats, but flat out incorrect. The problem with fixing the earnings gap is that it will take some very heavy social engineering. In Denmark, where parental leave can be split, mothers still take the overwhelming majority (90:10) so the gap persists. Removing that choice and forcing a 50/50 split would actually be the most effective way of closing the gap - the question is, is that desirable?
|
|
|
Post by asfound on Nov 11, 2018 11:20:21 GMT
Not an echo chamber, just some informed intelligent people talking based on facts. Contrastingly, I had a very productive chat on twitter yesterday with an acquaintance who first doubted the gender pay gap, who then listened, read some articles and said he'd gone away informed. That, is how the grown ups do it. I've read plenty of articles across the spectrum, as well as the actual reports and analyses (I work in a research institute with statistics so I have to). Do not assume people with a different opinion are automatically less informed. Intelligent people taking based on facts eh? If you do say so yourself.
|
|
1,064 posts
|
Post by bellboard27 on Nov 12, 2018 18:51:53 GMT
I’ve noticed the National Theatre is selling a book entitled “Feminist”. It consists entirely of blank pages.
Of course it’s just a notebook.
OR
Could they be sending some subtle message I can’t figure out?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2018 20:58:00 GMT
I have been considering starting a change.org petition for a 9pm curfew for men. If there are enough signatories the issue will have to be debated in parliament. Who knows we may even get them to pass a law. I think we should at least try it for a month. Can you imagine, a whole month with the men locked in after 9pm and us women free to roam the streets, parks and public spaces of the UK stress and hassle free. In the future we could have this extended to asking men step down from all positions of power - just for a trial month. Bagsie artistic directorship of the NT. Bring it on.
|
|
5,844 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Nov 16, 2018 12:56:13 GMT
I would break that law - as a matter of principle.
My freedom should not be curbed in that way. I pose no physical (or other) threat towards any person I meet on the street at any time of day or night. Indeed I plan my routes in order to maximise my own safety.
Legally curbing my freedom just because of my sex/gender is unjustifiable.
And in a world where people are campaigning for the right to self-identify, what would stop anyone who wanted to break such a law for nefarious reasons from just self-identifying in such a way as to avoid the restrictions?
Far better to campaign for better street lighting, broader CCTV coverage in hotspot areas, increased police activity - where such things can make a real difference when it comes to deterrence.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2018 13:06:17 GMT
Can you imagine, a whole month with the men locked in after 9pm and us women free to roam the streets, parks and public spaces of the UK stress and hassle free Except of course that the very men likely to ignore such a curfew are going to be the most dangerous to women, and the decent men who would step in and help won't be around. In the utopia I envisage men will never have to come to our aid because there will be enough protection in place. This is all a temporary measure you understand, giving men time to reflect upon and address the deficiencies that have brought the world to such a sorry pass. All the decent men will be deployed in the reprogramming of the weird ones.
|
|
5,844 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Nov 16, 2018 14:01:41 GMT
Except of course that the very men likely to ignore such a curfew are going to be the most dangerous to women, and the decent men who would step in and help won't be around. In the utopia I envisage men will never have to come to our aid because there will be enough protection in place. This is all a temporary measure you understand, giving men time to reflect upon and address the deficiencies that have brought the world to such a sorry pass. All the decent men will be deployed in the reprogramming of the weird ones. No. Just no. I am not going to be held responsible for those who assault or abuse. It is utterly wrong to blame one entire section of the population because there are those whose behaviour is inappropriate/illegal/dangerous. Just as it is wrong to victim blame Trying to set all men up as the problem is to misunderstand the situation.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2018 14:50:22 GMT
It's easy to think of the world as Us and Them and convince yourself that it's Them that's the problem. And it's frighteningly easy to convince yourself that it's justifiable to strip Them of Their rights. When those things are history we call them atrocities. When we're doing them we call them necessary.
I've no respect for people who think "equality" means "it's my turn to be the bully".
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2018 18:41:21 GMT
I am heartened that men on here are so outraged by my provocation, but I am a little puzzled. If so many of you stand up for equality etc why is there still so much discrimination and everyday sexism? Why are women still so unsafe in the world? While the figures for violence against women in the UK are not amongst the worst in the world they are still pretty bad. In 2015/16 there was a spike in domestic violence figures. Apparently, a couple of women are killed each week through domestic violence and that does not include the figures for those who are injured or hospitalised in those circumstances. This represents the extreme form of discrimination. I listened to a radio phone in the other day which said that most crimes are committed by poc (untrue) which justified stop and search. Perhaps the same logic should be applied to VAW.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2018 18:53:09 GMT
I am heartened that men on here are so outraged by my provocation, but I am a little puzzled. If so many of you stand up for equality etc why is there still so much discrimination and everyday sexism? Why are women still so unsafe in the world? While the figures for violence against women in the UK are not amongst the worst in the world they are still pretty bad. In 2015/16 there was a spike in domestic violence figures. Apparently, a couple of women are killed each week through domestic violence and that does not include the figures for those who are injured or hospitalised in those circumstances. This represents the extreme form of discrimination. I listened to a radio phone in the other day which said that most crimes are committed by poc (untrue) which justified stop and search. Perhaps the same logic should be applied to VAW. I think the "outrage" comes from the fact that your proposal to deal with this issue is to simply enforce a different form of discrimination more than anything else.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2018 19:04:40 GMT
Honestly, it's very disheartening to see how strongly some people feel about a hypothetical proposed curfew compared with some of the other things they've expressed displeasure with in the past. Even the most Eeyore-ish of board members who rarely express positive opinions on anything have never reacted with as much raw displeasure before. If you all took this level of response to the idea of being theoretically disadvantaged and applied it to supporting people who are *actually* disadvantaged, you could all be a real force for good in the world. But I guess real problems aren't as important to some people as thought experiments are. Still, I guess it's useful to know where we all stand...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2018 20:35:32 GMT
I'm going to start this off by saying that I'm not getting at any particular person when I write this, or even any particular discussion. It's a difficult post to write, and I've no idea who will have been the most recent poster when I submit it. (There's one woman here who thought I hated her because I posted something immediately after she did and she thought it was directed at her. I tried to explain that her post hadn't been the last one when I'd started writing, but I'm not sure she ever believed me.) This particular post has taken well over an hour. I'm not even entirely sure what point I'm trying to make yet.
As I revealed last year in a similar discussion, I've been a victim of abuse myself, for about two and half years starting shortly before my fourteenth birthday. It's been difficult. But it was years ago, and although there are some things I was forced into that I still can't talk about, even to myself — the very thought of putting them into words gives them a power I can't face — for the most part I've recovered.
But the thing I find most distressing — the thing that means I have to take sedatives in order to sleep several times a month — is that as far as many women are concerned I'm treated as an abuser, not a victim. The sexual abuse was many years ago. The emotional and verbal abuse from women who really ought to be on my side happens almost daily. It's something I can never put behind me. It's a ceaseless torment.
Every time women treat the issue of abuse or sexism or feminism or anything else as a men-against-women thing it's basically telling me that what happened to me doesn't count. A year ago I was told in no uncertain terms that I wasn't allowed to have my own opinion of how I should best handle the abuse I myself suffered because my opinion wasn't woman-approved. It sometimes felt like I was being berated for daring to step on their turf. I suspect some of the women didn't even bother to read my difficult admission, as not listening to what any man had to say was very much the order of the day.
I can't put into words how much pain it causes me whenever any woman attacks "men" as a generic concept. It's not just the comments themselves: the very knowledge that there are many women out there who think of me as The Enemy and think they are right to do so causes me an immense amount of distress. The sexual abuse I suffered was at school and my abusers were other kids; they didn't have a full understanding of what they were doing, and knowing that has helped me to accept it. But all the people here are adults, and they bloody well should understand the implications of the things they say and do.
We all know that the way women were treated in the past was a disgrace and that although things are improving there's still some way to go, but it's vitally important to make sure the right target is attacked. Indiscriminate bigotry towards men isn't standing up for women's rights. It's beating up a kid who spent two and a half years having unwanted cocks shoved in both ends of him and doesn't even get to call it rape because legally it can't be.
Some people here seem more concerned with attacking men than with making things better for women. That needs to change. Because if your behaviour results in a child abuse victim needing sedation to sleep then you're not one of the good guys, no matter how much you justify it to yourself.
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Nov 16, 2018 20:42:30 GMT
Matthew, I normally ignore the more serious stuff on here, so have not said what I think before. But your unbelievably, painfully brave post has made me want me to add my bit, for the record.
I am totally fed up with the hatred towards men in general on this board. So much so that I don't post on here so much any more. To those who are doing this, please stop. In particular, please stop turning so many threads into an anti-men agenda.
Just stop.
Matthew 💔
|
|
316 posts
|
Post by martello736 on Nov 16, 2018 21:42:21 GMT
Hello lovely people. I'm going to write a proper "this is my life experience as a trans woman" thing when I get a moment but first I want to respond to the curfew thing. When I was in my third year at university, I acted as a mentor to some of the first years who had attendance problems and who were slipping behind on their work. There was one particular boy, or should I say, young man, who was very clearly suffering from depression and it impacted his ability to complete his assignments and revise for his exams. It took me a while to get him to speak openly about his problems but it became apparent that he had very low self esteem, and found it distressing to go on social media because of nasty comments that he would find on there. A bit more digging revealed that it wasn't specific targeted abuse, he'd look down his Twitter timeline for example and see tweets like "men should just die" and "men are trash" with upwards of 20,000 likes each - many of which came from feminists and supposed social justice activists thinking they were making a bold progressive stance - and he would feel like each of those people were speaking specifically to him and had a whole army backing them up. When he walked through the university campus, he assumed that every woman automatically hated him for being male unless they proved otherwise. It eroded his self-confidence and he found himself unable to function because he felt so heavily berated because of his arbitrary characteristics that he lost sight of the point. I'm gonna be honest, I was quite possibly one of those "eughhh f*** all men" types before I met that guy, but it completely changed my mind. You can never be too kind. You can never show enough compassion. Oppression is a vile thing to experience, believe me I know, but if your first response is to fire that same vitriol you've had shown to you into the faces of people who haven't done anything to you, you're probably not the great person that you see yourself as. Women go through a lot of sh*t, but that doesn't excuse such nastiness. 3 out of 4 suicides in the UK are male, men on the whole really struggle to talk openly about their feelings, and that's just as much because of the "you don't matter" culture social justice has created as it is the fault of other men. If when a man tells you that he's struggling your first response is to a) tell him why his problems are irrelevant or b) say "yeah well that's just patriarchy so it's your own fault anyway" then you need to take a step back and consider that maybe you need to show that same kindness you wish somebody had shown you when you needed it. Be kind, always. Matthew, you're beautiful and amazing and if I could give you a hug right now I would. Anybody who tells you that you have something to feel guilty for for as a result of things beyond your control is an idiot. As a fellow sexual abuse victim, I will always have your back, and you are incredibly brave for speaking out
|
|
316 posts
|
Post by martello736 on Nov 16, 2018 21:53:52 GMT
More thoughts, sorry... I really think we need to stop applying collective guilt. This notion of "men, you need to stop other men from being twats" is really weird. The kinds of lovely, funny, sweet, wonderful men that really take this kind of rhetoric to heart and are affected by it are the same people that would have absolutely no power in convincing the 'gym bros' to stop whistling at women in the street. I have so many incredible men in my life and it's wrong to lump them in with the predators and the vile people just because they share the same anatomy. For every man that's threatened me in the street there's been another man who would challenge him or rush over to check I'm okay. Last year I was punched in the middle of Stevenage and a total stranger gave me £20 so I could get a taxi home and refused to give me his details so I could reimburse him because he wanted to do something nice. There are so many lovely men on this forum too, and it pains me to think of you reading unnecessarily bitter comments that attack your humanity for the crime of being a man. There are horrible, awful men out there (and I'll do a post about that once I've had time to collect my thoughts) but it's always wrong to assume. Random thing I've just remembered, Guardian journalist Caitlin Moran put out a tweet a few weeks ago asking men about what they struggle with most in life, and there were so many people who replied with things like "I don't even know how to respond to this because it's not a question I've ever been asked before". It was a real shame. Feminism should be making things better for everyone, not just those the orthodoxy deems worthy of it.
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Nov 16, 2018 22:00:40 GMT
I’m sad that people on this Board are negatively affected by what others have said but I’m proud that we do discuss this here and I hope our love of theatre can be unifying and positive from now on.
If I may introduce another related idea into the thread, it is how we bring up children to be respectful of each other regardless of how we express our gender or sexuality. We can help to do this simply by example, in the home and in public. Children do not naturally discriminate. But we also have to protect them and teach them how to protect themselves. So we introduce anxieties which they interpret within the culture they live in. It is very tricky but crucial to get this right and we don’t always succeed. Raising a boy to be a man is one of the greatest privileges I have had in my life. It is like holding your breath while running very fast.
|
|