873 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by juicy_but_terribly_drab on Sept 10, 2023 13:19:04 GMT
I saw Past Lives yesterday and it is probably my film of the year so far. So subtle and layered with gorgeous cinematography and impeccable direction made even more impressive by this being a debut feature from Celine Song (I wonder if anyone on here has managed to catch her theatrical work though perhaps not given that her first was cut short by the pandemic and her other was an experimental production of The Seagull performed in The Sims 4 and livestreamed on Twitch). The three leads all gave incredibly nuanced performances and the writing allowed them all to protray convincingly human and complicated characters.
The film follows Nora, a Korean immigrant to Canada and later the USA who has to navigate her relationship with her American husband against her feelings towards her childhood sweetheart who arrives from Korea 24 years after she left. There's a lot more to the film, which has a unique 3 Act structure with each taking place 12 years apart, but that's sort of the central conflict. It explores themes of identity, love, and the messy feelings brought up by people returning to your life and stirring up thoughts of what might have been. A set-up like could be an incredibly cliché forbidden romance or something - perhaps like The Bridges of Madison County which I do actually love and is itself also more nuanced than that makes it sound - but Song manages to avoid all those potential pit-falls, perhaps thanks to the story being based on her own experiences.
It's this year's Aftersun which is the highest of compliments I can give it except that it might even be slightly better, though I'd have to give both another watch to be sure about that. Go and see it!
|
|
3,578 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Sept 10, 2023 14:02:25 GMT
As an Aftersun loather, I sincerely hope it bears no resemblance to that tedium-fest; I've booked to see this & was looking forward to it until I read that odious comparison!
|
|
|
Post by theatregoer22 on Sept 10, 2023 16:39:34 GMT
I was already excited having heard great things about it from US critics, but now you've compared to to one of my favourite films of last year I'm looking forward to seeing it even more.
|
|
873 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by juicy_but_terribly_drab on Sept 10, 2023 16:56:52 GMT
As an Aftersun loather, I sincerely hope it bears no resemblance to that tedium-fest; I've booked to see this & was looking forward to it until I read that odious comparison! I'd say it's only like Aftersun in that it's an understated debut from a female director and it's very accomplished for a first film. I didn't find it tedious (though of course I didn't find Aftersun tedious) but it's definitely deliberately paced.
|
|
1,485 posts
|
Post by mkb on Sept 13, 2023 0:32:21 GMT
As an Aftersun loather, I sincerely hope it bears no resemblance to that tedium-fest; I've booked to see this & was looking forward to it until I read that odious comparison! It is possible to like Past Lives and be tepid on Aftersun. I thought the latter mediocre and worth only three stars, whereas Past Lives is a five-star in my book. It grows as the film progresses. It opens with an unseen couple discussing the protagonists from a distance wondering who they are. Our interest is immediately engaged and we are drawn into their backstory. As time passes, these characters evolve in ways that are entirely authentic. There is no big drama here, just people being disarmingly and touchingly human. Their responses and choices, despite being rooted in Korean culture, reveal themselves to be universal, relatable to all. Be prepared to wallow. There's no fast editing, no emotional manipulation. But it does leave a mark. It's not a movie you are likely to forget.
|
|
3,578 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Sept 15, 2023 2:55:00 GMT
Though I expected this to be slow, I actually found it almost tedious, not helped by a woman nearby who used her mobile during most of the film itself, at one point actually appearing to be filming it for a prolonged spell, so far as I could tell, and texting or reading from it at other times. Both for fear of provoking a row and missing some of the film myself, I felt unable to say anything and certainly not to leave the auditorium to speak to staff, as it would have been obvious that I was the complainant and afterwards I was dashing for a train home. Not what you expect at a Curzon. Anyway, I did sit through it but resorted to checking my watch eventually and was relieved to find that well over half the time had elapsed. Now I shall wait to see if it lingers with me, as suggested.
|
|