328 posts
|
Post by barrowside on Aug 11, 2018 18:36:38 GMT
Alas Brian Friel has already died a few years ago. He is most probably regarded as the finest Irish playwright with four masterpieces, Philadelphia, Here I Come!, Translations, Faith Healer and Dancing at Lughnasa and a large canon of other very fine works.
|
|
5,062 posts
|
Post by Phantom of London on Aug 12, 2018 0:07:45 GMT
Yes he did die and that was quite recent, I remember him being alive, that’s why I thought he was still going.
He can now enter the lexicon of great Irish playwrights.
|
|
40 posts
|
Post by dave72 on Aug 12, 2018 1:33:53 GMT
He was a great Irish playwright long before he died.
|
|
|
Post by lem on Aug 12, 2018 10:43:13 GMT
The matinee today was completely ruined by a high pitched noise throughout much of the first act. I wondered if it was a bizarre alienation effect at first, but then just felt sicker and sicker. Sometimes it would stop, and I could hear a soundtrack of birds and try and get back into the play (which I thought was rather beautiful and reminded me of “Our Country’s Good” in terms of tone. Turns out some idiot had taken her hearing aid out and left it switched on and it was interfering with the sound. I’ve never experienced this before. NT refunded me, said today’s the last day so they couldn’t offer an alternative date. I think the 40 other people who queued to complain in the interval went back in. I have no idea how, maybe they don’t get migraines like me. Am feeling sick and angry and very very uncharitable towards that woman. I was in the circle and the noise was quite annoying - I did wonder if it was a deliberate effect or just my ears playing up. The second act was fine so obviously the announcement from the SM at the end of the interval had the desired effect. Enjoyed the play but it felt to me like the writer ran out of material at the end - maybe I just missed the point, but it seemed to stop rather abruptly with a lack of any conclusion.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Nov 28, 2018 0:06:44 GMT
I've just seen a Twitter thread pondering whether the playwright Frank McGuinness, who adapted Dancing at Lughnasa for the screen, is the same Frank McGuinness who penned an episode of Lexx -the Dark Zone. IMDB appears to confirm this, though IMDB isn't gospel. Can it possibly be true?
|
|
213 posts
|
Post by peelee on Nov 29, 2018 21:18:59 GMT
It is likely to be true. In writing terms he seems to have done all sorts of projects.
|
|
|
Post by intoanewlife on Dec 18, 2019 0:01:48 GMT
Saw this today, I loved the first part, but it lost me completely in the second act.
Beautiful staging and great performances though.
|
|
|
Post by intoanewlife on Dec 18, 2019 0:04:46 GMT
I don’t buy a programme usually nowadays but this time I did. It does have some good stuff in it including a diary written by Friel about the writing of this play. He says at one point that it is not political but it is all about the language and then again that he does not favour concept plays. ( hear that David Hare?) but then what does the NT do? Plonk a purely political ending ( don’t we love a lighting change and good clange noise to imdicate prisons?) which isn’t in the text right there at the end. As if we are incapable of making our own judgements, an insult to Hinds who delivers the last speech with such accomplishment and frankly, daft. It is all about the language and that says it all. We can open up our minds to the suggestions that makes and to the whole colonialism, repression , everything will come forward so why do the NT bods think we are so stupid? The audience was full of young people. It must still be lurking on the A level syllabus then. It is a masterpiece and here, very well done except for that last moment. They just couldn’t help themselves could they? The ending felt as patronising as Ivo van Hove's coda at the end of Network with the footage of the Presidents. Why don't these directors trust that we've "got" it? You didn't 'get' Fairview...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2019 0:14:24 GMT
Saw it this evening and found it pretty interminable, I’m afraid.
It may just be that I have a monster cold and spent most of the overlong first half fighting the urge to cough, but I honestly think I’d have felt the same if I was in good health.
It just seemed to be a bunch of bumpkins wittering endlessly at each other about not very much at all, interspersed with some genuinely interesting moments about the value and meaning of language, and the promise of a he-fancies-her-but-she-fancies-the-other-guy confrontation that never came (for the audience anyway).
I understood what they were doing by ending with the armed guys but I really didn’t grasp what prompted the closing declamation.
|
|
|
Post by intoanewlife on Dec 18, 2019 0:36:30 GMT
Saw it this evening and found it pretty interminable, I’m afraid. It may just be that I have a monster cold and spent most of the overlong first half fighting the urge to cough, but I honestly think I’d have felt the same if I was in good health. It just seemed to be a bunch of bumpkins wittering endlessly at each other about not very much at all, interspersed with some genuinely interesting moments about the value and meaning of language, and the promise of a he-fancies-her-but-she-fancies-the-other-guy confrontation that never came (for the audience anyway). I understood what they were doing by ending with the armed guys but I really didn’t grasp what prompted the closing declamation. The first half took a while to get going, but the latter parts of it were really interesting, entertaining and set up a really good premise for what was to come. The second act was melodramatic, silly, lazy and pointless.
|
|
1,243 posts
|
Post by nash16 on Dec 18, 2019 2:27:15 GMT
The ending felt as patronising as Ivo van Hove's coda at the end of Network with the footage of the Presidents. Why don't these directors trust that we've "got" it? You didn't 'get' Fairview... Wow again! Are you stalking my old comments on different threads now? (moderators, can anything be done about her?) I would also advise keeping Fairview comments on the Fairview thread. It's why we have different threads for things.
|
|
|
Post by intoanewlife on Dec 18, 2019 2:50:31 GMT
You didn't 'get' Fairview... Wow again! Are you stalking my old comments on different threads now? (moderators, can anything be done about her?) I would also advise keeping Fairview comments on the Fairview thread. It's why we have different threads for things. LOL I was just kidding, lighten up x
|
|
1,061 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by David J on Dec 18, 2019 9:02:12 GMT
Well I’m going to put my two cents here and say I’d take Fryl to give me a dose of politics over the ton of plays that come out these days. He’s a bit like Chekhov and Ibsen where he writes about people and their lives who react to what’s going on in the world
It’s more subtle that way where the politics seep through the floor boards and the audience is left to discuss what they saw. I’d rather see that than a play where the playwright outright says whatever trending issue he’s going to address or make a big ham fisted coup de theatre by the end
Which is why I felt the ending took away from what was otherwise an interesting and occasionally poignant play
I agree the play slows down at times. It suddenly picked up for me when Fra Free turned up. That lad needs more attention because he works everyone beautifully and even when he’s not talking I enjoyed watching the facial acting he gives
I also enjoyed the moments between the locals and the soldiers trying to understand one another and the scenes between Owen and George working out how to anglicise the places names. A brilliant example of how to drive home your message
The acting all round I can’t complain.
Also the scene between George and moira is one of the most heart felt moments I’ve seen all year. It’s just a shame that, like previous posts have said, I couldn’t understand what happened between scenes in act 2
So yes this is a mixed bag. Not one of friels best and I could have done without the ending. But otherwise something I’m happy to have seen elevated by the acting
|
|
|
Post by londonpostie on Dec 18, 2019 10:19:56 GMT
Saw it last year and last week, at the NT. On both occasions I thought it was so poignant and very cleverly crafted; a celebration of language but also an accessible dissertation on culture, identity and colonialism - what are you supposed to do in the face of 'progress', fight it or embrace it - here, literally. Answers on a postcard from all parts of the globe.
A very excellent achievement here by the now departed Brian Friel.
|
|
|
Post by intoanewlife on Dec 18, 2019 11:18:23 GMT
I loved it up until the Moira/George scene (which as others have said was just beautiful), then it just became confusing after that.
The girl is running around the stage and the next minute the brother is leaving town and George is missing. Was he meant to have seen them or not because we never saw that? Then the soldiers turn up and say they are going to destroy the entire area if he is not found. Really? Would they have REALLY done that because one soldier went missing? Or are we to take it that was their plan all along and they were just using this event as a catalyst? Then the Father starts babbling about something I couldn't hear very well, and then it was all over.
It all just felt like such a contrast to Act 1 which despite taking a while to warm up, was so beautifully written and interesting. In the end I was left feeling a bit baffled instead of shaken like I think I was supposed to when those lights came on.
|
|
1,061 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by David J on Dec 18, 2019 17:53:01 GMT
I loved it up until the Moira/George scene (which as others have said was just beautiful), then it just became confusing after that. The girl is running around the stage and the next minute the brother is leaving town and George is missing. Was he meant to have seen them or not because we never saw that? Then the soldiers turn up and say they are going to destroy the entire area if he is not found. Really? Would they have REALLY done that because one soldier went missing? Or are we to take it that was their plan all along and they were just using this event as a catalyst? Then the Father starts babbling about something I couldn't hear very well, and then it was all over. It all just felt like such a contrast to Act 1 which despite taking a while to warm up, was so beautifully written and interesting. In the end I was left feeling a bit baffled instead of shaken like I think I was supposed to when those lights came on. I've looked up the plot in wikipedia and ultimately what happens between those scenes are left vague. It is hinted that George is attacked, possibly by the twins that we never see who stole some army equipment earlier in the play. That was my theory as I tried to follow the action. I can't believe George only wanted to sleep with Moira once and leave her Why Friel wanted to leave this vague I've no idea and it rather ruined for me what happened in the first half of the second act As for the soldiers threatening to scorch the land, I'd put it down to the ingrained animosity and suspicion between the english and irish over the centuries. Especially with the english working to anglicise Ireland. Its possible George's absence was the excuse they were looking for to destroy everything
|
|
|
Post by londonpostie on Dec 18, 2019 18:14:42 GMT
I don't think anything is vague. It just isn't spoon fed. George was kidnapped and killed by the twins and his body disappeared in the hope recriminations would be at least delayed. The British response to this is the same as occupying forces the world over through all of history - for example, the raising of Fallujah by the USA in response to contractors being killed. It's a language well understood.
The brother leaves becasue he thinks the British will accuse him of George's disappearance (the girl having publically turned him down in favour of George).
The girl is not "running around the stage". God help us.
|
|
|
Post by intoanewlife on Dec 18, 2019 18:45:00 GMT
I don't think anything is vague. It just isn't spoon fed. George was kidnapped and killed by the twins and his body disappeared in the hope recriminations would be at least delayed. The British response to this is the same as occupying forces the world over through all of history - for example, the raising of Fallujah by the USA in response to contractors being killed. It's a language well understood. The brother leaves becasue he thinks the British will accuse him of George's disappearance (the girl having publically turned him down in favour of George). The girl is not "running around the stage". God help us. The girl is literally running around the stage while George and Moira are kissing...dunno how you missed it...maybe you were too busy being superior ? I assumed she was running to tell the bother...but she just stopped running and the next scene is the brother packing his clothes in a different part of the stage. I assumed she'd told him, he saw them and was leaving because of that, but then all a sudden out of the blue George is now missing and he's leaving because he was worried of being accused of killing George. Um wtf? When did this happen? Who are these twins we never see and why did they kill him? Because he was British? Because he stole their friends girl? From there on it was all badly written exposition and a couple of metaphorical monologues before turning on a few lights to show a bit of barbed wire. The whole play went from showing us what was happening to telling us what had happened, vaguely. The whole flow of the play and method of storytelling change in the 2nd Act when it had been totally linear in the first. It was a sloppy, lazy mess x
|
|
|
Post by londonpostie on Dec 18, 2019 19:08:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by intoanewlife on Dec 18, 2019 19:11:17 GMT
Avatar got a few 5 star reviews, whats your point?
|
|
1,061 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by David J on Dec 18, 2019 21:21:41 GMT
Not spoon fed. Sure. And as I said I correctly guessed what had happened.
The problem is that up till that point the play didn’t jump ahead between scenes and left the audience to figure out some major plot points.
That and right before that last scene had been such an emotional high point with George and moira coming together and that girl seeing her and running off as intoanewlife says. I felt joyous and scared for the pair. Then suddenly we’re brought down to earth and left to put together the pieces
Ill judged I feel. Is that whole bit of the girl running round and round the stage part of the script or something the director put in the heighten the emotion?
I sound like I’m making this worse than it is. I’d still say half of the play, from Fra Free’s entrance to the pair coming together, is really good
|
|
|
Post by intoanewlife on Dec 18, 2019 22:19:02 GMT
Not spoon fed. Sure. And as I said I correctly guessed what had happened. The problem is that up till that point the play didn’t jump ahead between scenes and left the audience to figure out some major plot points. That and right before that last scene had been such an emotional high point with George and moira coming together and that girl seeing her and running off as intoanewlife says. I felt joyous and scared for the pair. Then suddenly we’re brought down to earth and left to put together the pieces Ill judged I feel. Is that whole bit of the girl running round and round the stage part of the script or something the director put in the heighten the emotion? I sound like I’m making this worse than it is. I’d still say half of the play, from Fra Free’s entrance to the pair coming together, is really good The girl didn't run around the stage apparently...that was just a figment of our imagination... I got everything apart from the twins killing George. I still quite enjoyed it, the change was just a blight on what would've been a much better play if it had've just played out properly. If it was a time problem they could've cut down some of the drivel in the first part of Act 1 in order to flesh out Act 2 more.
|
|
1,243 posts
|
Post by nash16 on Dec 18, 2019 23:08:03 GMT
Wow again! Are you stalking my old comments on different threads now? (moderators, can anything be done about her?) I would also advise keeping Fairview comments on the Fairview thread. It's why we have different threads for things. LOL I was just kidding, lighten up x Too late for the late for that, unfortunately. You've been reported to the moderators apparently.
|
|
|
Post by intoanewlife on Dec 19, 2019 1:14:20 GMT
LOL I was just kidding, lighten up x Too late for the late for that, unfortunately. You've been reported to the moderators apparently. Bless x
|
|
1,324 posts
|
Post by londonmzfitz on Dec 19, 2019 14:19:50 GMT
And ... moving forward
I saw this last night, having read the play last month, so everything made sense to me (although in reading the play I was waiting to confirm what happened to George but it is laid out in the dialogue, just not presented to the audience). Manus says he saw Maire with George Yolland when they left the dance early "her face buried in his shoulder .... and shouted at them".
Beautifully performed by everyone on stage, I was impressed by every performance. Sarah in particular, thought she was a little star. Full house.
|
|