|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2017 10:50:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by floorshow on Oct 11, 2017 12:26:29 GMT
Never drunk the stuff myself, but doesn't it stain worse than wine? Or do they mix the fairy in with it before they chuck it? {Spoiler - click to view}More to do with the magical cleansing properties of fairy liquid than the unpleasantness of Ribena, I think. They did talk about it at some length but it was deservedly overshadowed by Desmond Barrit's lewd asides and anecdotes and then Stockards late arrival (sans makeup and wig)
|
|
5,159 posts
|
Post by TallPaul on Oct 11, 2017 12:41:55 GMT
Perhaps they use Cillit Bang? Barry Scott would know.
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Oct 12, 2017 13:06:04 GMT
Many years ago I was stage managing a play in a suburb of Barcelona. It was seriously low budget, so when I say stage managing what I really mean is that I was the only person not actually acting. A lot of whisky was imbibed on stage each night and the Catalan actresses were having none of your British cold tea and insisted on flat ginger beer. So every evening, before curtain up, I spent ages and ages concocting the 3 bottles of whisky that had to be opened and consumed on stage. I used to go into the tiny toilet and shake the ginger beer and pour it from one container to another until there was no sign of bubbles. Very time consuming. Each of the actresses would, at some point, come into the toilet to use it for its actual purpose or to use the cracked mirror for making up their faces. We'd exchange pleasantries whilst I continued to vigorously shake my bottles. On the very last night one of them stopped on her way out and said:- Why don't you just put a peseta in the bottle? Gets rid of the bubbles instantly!" Well, duh! Now you tell me! Any copper coin will do, apparently!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2017 13:14:05 GMT
I hated fizzy drinks when I was a kid, so if a café only had Fanta or whathaveyou, my grandparents would flatten it for me by adding a spoonful of sugar. Must have been horrendous for my teeth, but another handy way to remove bubbles.
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Oct 12, 2017 15:04:15 GMT
I was just thinking why didn't you open the bottle the previous evening and leave it slightly unscrewed to let it go flat? There was a reason. There definitely was a reason. But I have absolutely no recollection as to what it was!😩😩😩😩
|
|
524 posts
|
Post by callum on Oct 18, 2017 13:14:47 GMT
How bad is the rail in row D @theatremonkey - it gets a mention on your website but nothing saying restricted view on atg. Central row D or row E to the side a little bit?
|
|
524 posts
|
Post by callum on Oct 18, 2017 14:00:45 GMT
Thanks Money - I'm well over 5ft5 so will plump for Row D so I get to stare at Stockard's face (ahem appreciate her acting facial expressions) up close. Don't know what we'd do without you!
|
|
1,133 posts
|
Post by Stephen on Oct 18, 2017 23:19:01 GMT
Had the absolute pleasure of seeing Apologia this evening. What a great play. Has many parallels with Meryl Streep Dinner Table movie (as I like to refer to it) or August: Osage County as the playwright would. Having read reviews I was expecting a mixed bag but was thrilled that it was such enjoyable material.
Some thoughts in bullet form:
- Brilliant cast.
I found Freema Agyeman annoying as the character, as is intended, but as an actor I think she nailed this. Ms Channing doesn't disappoint and I can report that her face is indeed filled with expression. Joseph Millson give a smashing performance in the second act as Simon although I found his performance as Peter somewhat lacking depth, perhaps the text doesn't help him much. Laura Carmichael is excellent also however interesting to note that I overheard some friends from the US in the foyer afterwards commenting on how her accent kept switching regions. I was so engrossed in the action that I did not notice! Finally, and not least, Desmond Barrit provides the comic relief and does so well, with a little time at the end of the play to be serious.
- Detailed set
The action of the play is framed well and the set is incredibly detailed however never a distraction.
- Lighting Design
You may be noticing a trend here, as this was great too! Lighting comes mainly from outside of the house where the play takes place, it's effective for many reasons but i'll let you decide why if you see this!
- Reception
The audience loved it. Most ovated.
- Ms Channing
Was polite and chatty at the stage door afterwards!
Interesting final note...
The theatre was only half full. Bad marketing campaign? Not appealing to the tourists? Whatever it was I felt like this was an audience of locals - not necessarily a bad thing. Great to see many young faces like myself there too!
If you have seen the play, let me know your thoughts!
|
|
524 posts
|
Post by callum on Oct 19, 2017 11:31:07 GMT
Was also there last night, taking advnatage of the under 25 offer. I had relatively mild expectations after reading the board, but actually I really enjoyed it. But I do agree that Act 2 seems like just an extended epilogue. Stockard was absolutely terrific, her performance was excellent - I can't believe she's 73! She delivers 'putrid sh*te' with unbelievable aplomb, and the final moments of the play were wonderful, too. Can anyone tell me what it was that was going across the top of her forehead? Was it a wig or a microphone?
If anything, I must confess that I found Joseph M a bit stiff - the first son was just a condescending nag and he didn't deserve his girlfriend, though maybe the character is just written without much depth. I didn't much go for his other turn either, though he did like the quiet-quiet-quiet-SHOUT style of saying his lines. Freema was great, and JF was absolutely awesome.
I'd have thought it was about two thirds full, and like Steve, I can't quite put my finger on why it isn't taking off. Perhaps the title. I guess the almost four month run doesn't help, maybe 8-10 weeks would've been better. Then again, it doesn't seem like its expensive to run, apart from Stockard's fee.
|
|
1,320 posts
|
Post by londonmzfitz on Oct 19, 2017 13:21:21 GMT
Saw this Saturday matinee and, having only dipped into comments here, went in with fairly low expectations. Stockard Channings first few lines felt a bit actressy, but then I was just absorbed by the whole thing. Loved the quick funny lines in Act 1, Act 2 much darker and I just wanted someone to hug her! Impressed with all the cast, Desmond Barrit's farewell line to Freema Agyeman was joyous!
Loved the stage "framing", and the lighting though the window, the rain ... Yeah, I'd give it 4* and I'm sad it hasn't sold as well as perhaps it should. I guess it's just a go nowhere story, there's just so much stuff that is left unresolved at the end.
|
|
134 posts
|
Post by romeo94 on Oct 26, 2017 19:17:50 GMT
Apologies if this has already been addressed. £15 Todaytix Rush for row AA... worth it?
|
|
1,133 posts
|
Post by Stephen on Oct 26, 2017 19:33:54 GMT
Apologies if this has already been addressed. £15 Todaytix Rush for row AA... worth it? I saw in row B on a Student ticket which was a perfect view. I also sat in AA at the interval to see what the view would be like. It's VERY close and the stage is fairly high but it's also a shallow set. I don't think you'd really miss anything and for £15 a definite bargain!
|
|
1,260 posts
|
Post by theatrelover123 on Oct 26, 2017 19:48:10 GMT
I have a single ticket to APOLOGIA for this Saturday matinee. Middle of Row A. Great seat. Now can't use it as I am rehearsing all day. Paid £15 for it but happy with offers.
|
|
3,578 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Oct 27, 2017 4:56:49 GMT
I saw this at last at yesterday's matinee, having kicked myself for weeks for booking at all as in that time I received so many great deals for it. However, the play itself lived up to my expectations and was worth the wait, and I'm glad to report that for whatever reason (word-of-mouth, deals, papering etc) the auditorium was reasonably full and the audience seemed attentive - and appreciative at the end.
My original seat was one of those which vanished in the reconfiguration, so I should have been in the new row A, but as there were a few gaps further back, I asked to move and was allowed to do so, for which I was very grateful and which improved my view. Had the answer been "no" I would obviously have accepted it.
|
|
1,287 posts
|
Post by theatrefan77 on Oct 30, 2017 23:10:30 GMT
Stockard Channing was out tonight which is a pity. The understudy was just ok but very underrehearsed and messed up her lines a few times.
It was according to the ushers the first time she played the part so I guess it would be unfair to compare her to Channing who is excellent in the part. On the other hand, the understudy, sorry I forgot her name, should have been given much more rehearsal time.
|
|
4,805 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Mark on Nov 7, 2017 22:50:47 GMT
She was out for most of last week aparantly.
I really enjoyed this tonight, particularly Laura Carmichael who I thought was wonderful. Stockard Channing was very good, I'll agree with earlier comments it's a shame to see how botched the cosmetic surgery is. I'll admit, having not read much about the play beforehand that I didn't know the two brothers were played by the same actor until I've just checked on the tube home....
Didn't expect this to be so funny... was howling at certain moments in act one.
Sat in row AA which was fine, missed a few small moments due to the table but could still see for the most part. I'd say it was about 60% full tonight
|
|
1,287 posts
|
Post by theatrefan77 on Nov 8, 2017 8:39:48 GMT
We went again on Monday to see Stockard Channing. Third time seeing the play, second time with Channing. She was again excellent but was walking with a stick this time. I guess she must have had some kind of injury which is probably the reason why she was absent for some performances.
|
|
950 posts
|
Post by vdcni on Nov 9, 2017 9:13:13 GMT
Well I really enjoyed this. Nothing groundbreaking but well drawn characters and the writer did a good job at letting you see all their points of view. The soap opera actress and the older son probably the least sympathetic but they were never demonised though I didn't like his last line as they were leaving.
Loved the relationship between Carmichael's & Channing's characters - I could have happily seen more of that.
Thought the cast were uniformly strong, Freema was off but her understudy did a great job.
I feel a lot of modern plays change tones in the second half after a lighter first half and it doesn't always work but it did here.
|
|
904 posts
|
Post by lonlad on Nov 9, 2017 15:31:18 GMT
Ms Channing has had a knee injury, hence the stick. Lord knows how she manages the major hike to and from her dressing room.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2018 19:08:31 GMT
|
|
1,133 posts
|
Post by Stephen on Aug 1, 2018 23:22:29 GMT
Oh Hugh Dancy...love him! He's a bit dreamy too. I really enjoyed this in London.
|
|