6,285 posts
|
Post by Jon on Mar 26, 2022 1:29:32 GMT
I can't understand why the heck Hare wrote this. Because he could. More interesting is why old Rigsby wanted to appear in it - promise of a Broadway transfer ? Just a guess. I find Hare's work hit and miss but theatre companies aren't going to turn down a new Hare play especially one with a name like Ralph Fiennes.
|
|
353 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by lichtie on Mar 28, 2022 17:58:03 GMT
So I enjoyed this more than the people who would rather have been watching paint dry. I would agree that if you have no interested in the topic of urban growth and planning and who decides what goes where (especially roads), or US history/politics, then avoid like the plague. I found it interesting though it's not really a play in the sense of a coherent whole. The "human interest" bit of Moses's life added nothing - in many ways the loyalty of his subordinates could have been strengthened to make it more obvious why he was let loose with the toys for so long. The ethnic aspects of the planning that was going on was lightly touched on, but felt like something that Hare was trying to skate over. Thereagain the definitive text is well over a thousand pages long so maybe he just couldn't decide how to focus it down to 2 hours in a play. He did manage to get across Moses' love of the motor car. Having seen The Shark is Broken a few months ago I couldn't help thinking that without Moses we'd never have had Jaws...
|
|
|
Post by sfsusan on Mar 29, 2022 23:30:03 GMT
So I enjoyed this more than the people who would rather have been watching paint dry. I agree, it wasn't nearly as boring as I'd feared. And the audience seemed to enjoy it... no empty seats after the interval, good comments overheard. I'm not a city planning geek, but parts of the discussion about the proposed Washington Square Park project echoed some of the city 'planning' done in San Francisco's Fillmore District in the 1950s/60s, so I found that interesting. Some plays I enjoy because of the performances, some because of a performer, some because of the content. This was one where the content (mostly) held my attention. I enjoyed the performances, although Ralph Fiennes seemed to be 'performing' rather than 'inhabiting' his character. (The character was a vivid personality, but I was thrown off when Fiennes seemed to direct some lines to the audience, particularly in a scene that was supposed to be in his office with just one or two other characters.) Overall, I'd give it 3 out of 5 stars.
|
|
|
Post by cavocado on Mar 31, 2022 13:51:57 GMT
It was pretty much what I expect from a David Hare play - good theme which touched on some interesting points (prioritising cars over public transport, the racism of slum clearance, visionary individual versus grassroots democracy, protecting diverse communities leading to gentrification and loss of diversity), but hamstrung by having to fit around this maverick, somewhat stereotyped central character (obsessive, drinks and shouts a lot, oblivious to other people's needs), and only anchored in reality by a few more nuanced supporting characters.
It was funny, and I liked the parts where the characters addressed the audience. I had a few yawning moments, but mostly it kept my attention, although I could hear someone snoring a couple of rows behind me for most of the second half.
|
|
4,550 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Mark on Apr 15, 2022 22:35:07 GMT
I quite enjoyed this tonight. I wasn't sure after act one, which I found a bit too focused and internal for the first bit, getting better towards the end. Act two was much stronger and I felt it all came together, and there was some really great dialogue.
|
|
1,321 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Dave B on Apr 16, 2022 7:58:03 GMT
We too enjoyed this last night. As Mark says, some really great dialogue. Some pacing issues in the first half but it did mostly come together nicely in the second. Really enjoyed Siobhán Cullen and think she should have really had an extra call along with Ralph Fiennes at the end.
The £25 front row seats were an absolute steal for this.
|
|
18,777 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Apr 20, 2022 16:18:35 GMT
At cinemas 26th May
|
|
515 posts
|
Post by callum on Apr 27, 2022 23:04:32 GMT
Had a fabulous time - so many interesting themes brought up (preservation of communities = preservation of power structures etc etc) and Fiennes top-rate. Loved the scene with Danny Webb as Gov Al Smith which even got a round of applause mid-act!
Can’t imagine there’d be a much of a bad view for this one so grab a bargain.
Direct in my sight view was a person that was asleep for the majority - why do these people want to go in the first place and then secondly not leave at the interval if they can’t be bothered to stay awake?! Perplexing!
|
|
|
Post by edi on Apr 28, 2022 8:59:06 GMT
We too enjoyed this last night. As Mark says, some really great dialogue. Some pacing issues in the first half but it did mostly come together nicely in the second. Really enjoyed Siobhán Cullen and think she should have really had an extra call along with Ralph Fiennes at the end. The £25 front row seats were an absolute steal for this. Hey Dave, where did you find £25 front row tickets? Thanks
|
|
1,321 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Dave B on Apr 28, 2022 10:06:07 GMT
We too enjoyed this last night. As Mark says, some really great dialogue. Some pacing issues in the first half but it did mostly come together nicely in the second. Really enjoyed Siobhán Cullen and think she should have really had an extra call along with Ralph Fiennes at the end. The £25 front row seats were an absolute steal for this. Hey Dave, where did you find £25 front row tickets? Thanks Looking back, it was direct with the Bridge in October last year. I'm not a member so that must have been around the start of normal booking.
We will email you once your Print at Home tickets are ready. Straight Line Crazy on Friday 15 April 2022 at 19:30 in Bridge Theatre
2 Adult tickets (Stalls: A13, A14) at £25.00 each
|
|
|
Post by sfsusan on Apr 28, 2022 19:30:28 GMT
why do these people want to go in the first place and then secondly not leave at the interval if they can’t be bothered to stay awake?! Perplexing! There was probably a partner who insisted on going and hasn't yet learned that it's not worth dragging someone somewhere they don't want to go.
|
|
1,177 posts
|
Post by joem on May 10, 2022 11:01:12 GMT
Ralph Fiennes is a top actor. David Hare's output is mixed but he certainly has written at least a couple of plays with claims to greatness - especially "The Absence of War" for me. The Bridge Theatre I am already very fond of. So bit of a no-brainer going to see this.
However the play itself leaves much to be desired. A bioplay of a figure who might have been in his time well-known in the US but is not really a household name here really does need much more background and context to grab your attention. In this case, despite the tension created by the slums clearance, there is not enough to chew except a fairly shallow side-taking on the issue, and it's clear what side Hare is on.
Despite a good, if 2Dish, performance by Fiennes and a great cameo by Danny Webb this is surely more of a play for Broadway? It would seem so from the number of American members of the audience. Welcome back!
|
|
608 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by mrnutz on May 17, 2022 11:17:59 GMT
I *may* have a spare ticket for this tomorrow night, Wednesday 18th. Row C in the stalls, central block - face value £72.50 but bought for £45 when on offer. Open to offers!
|
|
2,520 posts
|
Post by n1david on May 17, 2022 13:49:38 GMT
|
|
3,071 posts
|
Post by david on May 19, 2022 7:09:47 GMT
I had a really great time watching SLC at yesterday’s matinee. Getting one of the £25 front row seats (A51) was a bargain and had a great view of proceedings. As someone who has an interest in urban history I certainly got a lot of of this play (my last Hare play was the bore fest that was “I’m not running at the NT) and got a better understanding of how NY became the way it is today having only heard about Robert Moses via US history documentaries.
As a fan of Ralph Fiennes it was nice to see him up close on the stage though for me it was Danny Webb as Governor Al Smith that was worth the ticket price me and probably a lot of others in yesterday’s audience. He absolutely stole that 1 scene in Act 1. Siobhan Cullen as the fiery Finnuala Connell was another standout in the cast. Her performance in Act 2 again was a joy to watch.
Certainly I felt the play maybe at times glossed over the human and social impact of Moses’s decision making both on his work colleagues and the wider NY community and could if been explored in more depth in the writing.
I loved the two sets used from designer Bob Crowley but it was just a shame that those wonderful architect’s models were hidden at the back of the stage in the Act 2 set. Those I would of liked to have seen a bit more of.
The play was well received by the audience, especially by the number of US patrons in the audience. Overall, a worthwhile trip to the Bridge.
.
|
|
1,845 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by NeilVHughes on May 19, 2022 8:01:42 GMT
Thanks for the perfectly timed positivity david , am booked for tonight and was considering giving it a miss as could not generate any enthusiasm for the trip.
|
|
608 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by mrnutz on May 19, 2022 11:03:16 GMT
Saw this last night.
Without a doubt, the most boring thing I have ever had the misfortune of sitting through.
Dull story, dull staging, dull script. Good acting though.
|
|
|
Post by theatrebee on May 19, 2022 17:37:16 GMT
To each his/her own, but I had a great time watching Straight Line Crazy. I guess it's my sort of play. Can't get enough of the peculiar, eccentric, visionary genius type of character. Thought Ralph Fiennes would be the obvious highlight (and he was) but the rest of the cast were nuanced and seasoned as well.
|
|
3,071 posts
|
Post by david on May 20, 2022 10:53:00 GMT
Thanks for the perfectly timed positivity david , am booked for tonight and was considering giving it a miss as could not generate any enthusiasm for the trip. NeilVHughes did you end up going last night? If so, what did you think of it?
|
|
2,520 posts
|
Post by n1david on May 20, 2022 16:20:37 GMT
Airing Monday night at 10pm
|
|
1,247 posts
|
Post by mkb on May 23, 2022 12:23:50 GMT
Act 1 is badly in need of significant pruning and re-writing. It has very little to say over 71 minutes, and Moses and Governor Al Smith are played as larger-than-life stereotypes who speak to everyone as though it were a hustings speech. At times, Fiennes roams the large thrust stage simply because the space has to be filled, not because his character has any motivation to do so. The narrative is dull.
Act 2, as others have commented, improves considerably, and there is at least a glimmer of the human side of the characters. I was aching to know what Moses was like outside the office: did he socialise?; how was the relationship with his wife and family?
Hare's dialogues favours grand-standing rather than nuance. Expositional information is shoe-horned unconvincingly into the conversation between characters: you would think this was the work of a novice playwright.
There are some good performances, particularly from Siobhán Cullen as Moses' right-hand woman. However, Hare never manages to fully explain why she stood by Moses for so long if he was as monstrous as portrayed.
Three stars.
Act 1: 19:36-20:47 Act 2: 21:08-22:11
(I wish The Bridge would revert to its original policy of having Sunday performances and later evening starts (at 19:45 usually). When they opened, their scheduling policies were a breath of fresh air to those of us who have to travel from outside of London. Saturday evening shows are impossible without a hotel stay thanks to the rail policy of closing the West Coast Mainline mid-evening Saturday, so Sunday shows were very helpful.)
|
|
638 posts
|
Post by theatremiss on May 23, 2022 16:50:42 GMT
Act 1 is badly in need of significant pruning and re-writing. It has very little to say over 71 minutes, and Moses and Governor Al Smith are played as larger-than-life stereotypes who speak to everyone as though it were a hustings speech. At times, Fiennes roams the large thrust stage simply because the space has to be filled, not because his character has any motivation to do so. The narrative is dull. Act 2, as others have commented, improves considerably, and there is at least a glimmer of the human side of the characters. I was aching to know what Moses was like outside the office: did he socialise?; how was the relationship with his wife and family? Hare's dialogues favours grand-standing rather than nuance. Expositional information is shoe-horned unconvincingly into the conversation between characters: you would think this was the work of a novice playwright. There are some good performances, particularly from Siobhán Cullen as Moses' right-hand woman. However, Hare never manages to fully explain why she stood by Moses for so long if he was as monstrous as portrayed. Three stars. Act 1: 19:36-20:47 Act 2: 21:08-22:11 (I wish The Bridge would revert to its original policy of having Sunday performances and later evening starts (at 19:45 usually). When they opened, their scheduling policies were a breath of fresh air to those of us who have to travel from outside of London. Saturday evening shows are impossible without a hotel stay thanks to the rail policy of closing the West Coast Mainline mid-evening Saturday, so Sunday shows were very helpful.) Tbh I prefer a 7pm start so I can get an earlier train home as usually I have to hang around until the 2340hr train home and end up in the house at 0130hrs, a killer when you have work 6 hrs later. But I don’t suppose we can all be pleased at show times and train schedules. I always feel a little leap of joy when seeing Come From Away which finishes early and a.lows me to get the 2220hrs train home. Same with the Old Vic as it’s 5 mins to Waterloo and most shows finish around 2200hrs
|
|
848 posts
|
Post by bordeaux on Jun 9, 2022 12:04:47 GMT
This was so much better than I had been led to believe from some commenters and the odd review. Hare provides a fascinating character study and a portrait of a society as it changes from the 20s to the 30s. Some brilliant acting all the way down the cast, all relishing the wit and argument in the dialogue. Hare's best work for a decade and a half in my view.
|
|
|
Post by theoracle on Jun 10, 2022 8:24:11 GMT
Whilst I love David Hare and think his working with Nic Hytner and Ralph Fiennes on paper seemed like a safe option for a great evening, this ended up feeling rather flat with some of the ideas a little muddled to the point where when Moses and Finuala have their last confrontation, one can’t help but feel underwhelmed.
There are some fantastic performances here of course - Fiennes, Cullen, Bailey and Webb are all brilliant. It’s a pity therefore to see a story that seems so well carved out - I don’t think a lot of people know who Robert Moses is - could end up feeling a little undercooked. Maybe when you have such an “establishment” team like Hytner, Fiennes and Hare, telling a story that criticises those at the top will be more challenging. 3.5* from me
|
|
|
Post by budd on Jun 27, 2022 16:22:58 GMT
|
|