2,583 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by viserys on Apr 23, 2016 15:17:27 GMT
Well, Gentleman's Guide is based on a movie too (albeit one that had a different name) and both Spring Awakening and Fun Home have book sources they follow rather slavishly (to a point where I found myself bored by Fun Home because the show didn't really add anything to the wonderful graphic novel it is based on). And plenty of big new musicals tanked, such as Bullets over Broadway, Big Fish, Bridges of Madison County and that's just what I cant think of off the top of my head.
But overall, of course, you are right. Obviously, if London - like Broadway - would produce 5-6 new big(gish) musicals each season instead of one or two, there'd be a bigger chance that at least one of them would stick around for a few years.
|
|
750 posts
|
Post by horton on Apr 23, 2016 17:27:21 GMT
I'm not talking about whether they were good or not- just whether they recouped investment and therefore had a decent run. And yes shows do flop on Broadway, the point is, ALL new British musicals in London seem to die on their arse- nowadays even Cam Mac and ALW are not immune. The demographic has changed massively over the past 20 years and the industry doesn't seem to notice and/ or care, as if it is quite natural.
Having worked in the West End during the heydays of the late 80s and early 90s, I can't help but grieve the loss of creativity, artistry and employment British musicals used to bring.
|
|
3,824 posts
|
Post by anthony40 on Apr 23, 2016 17:54:41 GMT
Would we class Stephen Ward as a flop? I mean certainly in terms of Lloyd-Webbers previous show definitely.
From Here To Eternity definitely was.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2016 18:00:47 GMT
Stephen Ward was 100% a flop... and a god awful show!
Only three months run when it is intended to be open ended, definitely a flop!
|
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on Apr 23, 2016 18:00:59 GMT
Would we class Stephen Ward as a flop? I mean certainly in terms of Lloyd-Webbers previous show definitely. I definitely would. Saw it in the Christmas period when London was full of tourists and was upgraded from my Grand Circle seat over two levels to the Stalls - both Grand and Dress Circle were closed. But I can fully see why, as it simply isnt a very good show. If it weren't for ALW's name, it'd have never been staged.
|
|
724 posts
|
Post by basdfg on Apr 23, 2016 18:07:28 GMT
I hope Show Boat lasts till its closing date. Ive never been to a theatre which has had sections closed off I think. Even when I went to Jersey Boys which was fairly empty all here levels were open.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2016 18:21:37 GMT
I hope Show Boat lasts till its closing date. Ive never been to a theatre which has had sections closed off I think. Even when I went to Jersey Boys which was fairly empty all here levels were open. Yes I have never been to a theatre with sections closed of either. I hope Show Boat lasts too
|
|
716 posts
|
Post by theatre-turtle on Apr 23, 2016 18:28:14 GMT
I hope Show Boat lasts till its closing date. Ive never been to a theatre which has had sections closed off I think. Even when I went to Jersey Boys which was fairly empty all here levels were open. Yes I have never been to a theatre with sections closed of either. I hope Show Boat lasts too I'm a bit surprised as this is quite a common phenomenon. You must do well to avoid 'flopping' shows. Mrs Henderson is currently closing both the balcony and upper circle at many performances. Miss Saigon didn't even sell the upper circle for most of the Monday-Thursday performances of its final 6 months of its run.
|
|
724 posts
|
Post by basdfg on Apr 23, 2016 18:31:23 GMT
The Upper was open for Miss Saigon at Christmas I think. I do avoid flops. At the west end I have only seen Lion King (2003) Chitty (2005) Mary Poppins (2006) Sound of Music (2007) Oliver (2009) Wizard of Oz (2011) Jersey Boys (2012) White Christmas (2014) and Miss Saigon this Christmas.
|
|
3,824 posts
|
Post by anthony40 on Apr 23, 2016 19:57:10 GMT
Yes I have never been to a theatre with sections closed of either. I'm a bit surprised as this is quite a common phenomenon. You must do well to avoid 'flopping' shows. Mrs Henderson is currently closing both the balcony and upper circle at many performances. Miss Saigon didn't even sell the upper circle for most of the Monday-Thursday performances of its final 6 months of its run. Oh I have. I saw Spamalot in it's final weeks and won some sort of lottery for £2 to be in the upper circle but was moved to the Dress Circle as all other levels were closed.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2016 20:00:53 GMT
I don't think I have ever been to a show where a level has been closed other than BILB... both times I saw it the Upper Circle was closed and that was Summer 2015 and Winter 2015.
|
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on Apr 23, 2016 20:05:35 GMT
In a few of my Memphis visits (mostly midweek though), the Grand Circle was closed.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2016 21:03:15 GMT
I've not knowingly been to a show with sections closed off, but then I tend to sit stalls or dress circle so probably wouldn't notice. Also tend to go at weekends
I have sat in half empty stalls before Wicked and drowsy chaperone spring to mind
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2016 22:01:15 GMT
Yes I have never been to a theatre with sections closed of either. I hope Show Boat lasts too I'm a bit surprised as this is quite a common phenomenon. You must do well to avoid 'flopping' shows. Mrs Henderson is currently closing both the balcony and upper circle at many performances. Miss Saigon didn't even sell the upper circle for most of the Monday-Thursday performances of its final 6 months of its run. Ah well I usually 100% of the time go to the theatre on a weekend so it's usually busy. I saw Mrs Henderson but it was just as soon as it opened so fairly busy. Stalls seats were very expensive so say in grand circle and not upgraded but probably would be now. Went for a friends birthday to BILB and we were upgraded to front row stalls from upper circle. Stalls basically half empty and that was a Saturday matinee! We usually sit in stalls so I would notice the upper circle being closed...but it have seen some shows will quite a few stalls seats free. On Mamma Mia on NYE, a row or two of seats not filled but all tiers were open.
|
|
529 posts
|
Post by drowseychap on Apr 24, 2016 22:10:35 GMT
Totally agree drowsey chaperone I loved really great show ... Another was the goodbye girl ... Still went on to a very successful tour Flops aren't necessarily bad, they can just be not popular. Some of the best things I've seen had very short, unsuccesful, runs. I always feel appreciative that writers/producers continue to take chances - even when they don't always become hits. Yes, absolutely agree with this!! The Drowsy Chaperone is one of my all-time favourite musicals - but it was an absolute massive flop. I loved Lend Me A Tenor so much I saw it twice in a week. MASSIVE flop. I also adored The Umbrellas of Cherbourg. MASSIVE FLOP. On the other hand, I really didn't like Bend It Like Beckham, but that ran for longer than any others I mentioned above. Just personal taste - always crap when a great show closes, though!
|
|
6,370 posts
|
Post by Jon on Apr 25, 2016 18:40:12 GMT
Didn't Bombay Dreams run for about two years?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2016 18:56:09 GMT
Excuse the metaphor but Sonia Friedman literally dropped the ball on this one. I'd like to be fair to Sonia Friedman. The actual show was produced to a very high level, cast and creative. Yes, they didn't quite solve the football itself, but those of us who did see it - for the most part - had a really good evening out. Her problem was the a particular brand of market resistance to the content. If you look back over the history of West End plays and musicals, two subjects which just don't sell are "Football" and "Ethnic."* Putting both together as a subject and on a poster is a mountain rather than a hill to climb, even with the charm of the original film behind it. Well done her for having a try, I'd say. *I REALLY hope that doesn't offend, it was not intended to, but it was the only way I could describe anything other than well, "White, British." I don't think the idea worked very well and a musical made out of it wasn't the grandest idea. She could've invested in better shows. Saying that, all her other shows are always amazing and that's why I look up to her as a role model for aspiring producers. She has two of the biggest talked about musicals arriving this year, Funny Girl and Dreamgirls, both of which has done extremely well at box office already and will be done to a great standard. Well done for a try on BILB but I didn't enjoy it
|
|
4,631 posts
|
Post by Phantom of London on Apr 25, 2016 19:36:08 GMT
I always thought "Vampires" were the elephant in the room, for musicals.
Saying that when I said "dropped the ball" I meant it didn't do well as expected", I am sure the project was to pack them in at eye watering prices. I saw Beckham thrice and I did enjoy it, I don't agree it was a 5 star show as many of the media did, thought it was 3 stars. Although it was about Football and Race at its heart was 'accepting yourself for who you really are', which has always sold well in musical theatre.
|
|
396 posts
|
Post by djp on Apr 25, 2016 20:04:25 GMT
Excuse the metaphor but Sonia Friedman literally dropped the ball on this one. I'd like to be fair to Sonia Friedman. The actual show was produced to a very high level, cast and creative. Yes, they didn't quite solve the football itself, but those of us who did see it - for the most part - had a really good evening out. Her problem was the a particular brand of market resistance to the content. If you look back over the history of West End plays and musicals, two subjects which just don't sell are "Football" and "Ethnic."* Putting both together as a subject and on a poster is a mountain rather than a hill to climb, even with the charm of the original film behind it. Well done her for having a try, I'd say. *I REALLY hope that doesn't offend, it was not intended to, but it was the only way I could describe anything other than well, "White, British." It might be subject matter. You might also argue that Dagenham suffered from also trying to run an important piece of social history with a positive message . The sad thing is that Dagenham, Bendit, I can't Sing, Mrs Henderson, Memphis, and Love Dies all got their casting right, had better talent on show than some shows selling more, and the people l who went ended up in standing ovations. The problem is getting people in the door- and not having so many of those turning up, sitting behind me, saying i Didn't know this was a musical It might be something simpler though too. If you pick a film title , your title is unknown to anyone who hasn't seen the film. Films don't get seen by many people these days. Mrs Henderson tells the ticket buyer nothing. Bendit nothing. Memphis - nothing. Bloke's name from the Profumo scandal nothing. From here to Eternity - who has seen it recently? Even Miss Saigon shows a history, most people now have never been taught. Thats before you get to the dud books - like Viva, Love never dies, and the wrong title associations - like with the X factor and not being able to sing. Motown, however, seems to be pulling people in, without stars - presumably because they go expecting Motown music . Kinky Boots sounds intriguing. Funny girl sounds funny, and sells out because Sheridan is in it anyway. Alladin is well known. And Harry Potter is a money making dream even if its terrible,
|
|
6,370 posts
|
Post by Jon on Apr 26, 2016 12:50:09 GMT
Familarity and nostalgia seems to sell hence why musicals tend to be based on films or books or use pre existing music. Something like Kinky Boots which while based on a film, the film itself wasn't that well known in America, it was the story that appealed to the producers and eventually audiences.
|
|
|
Post by Honoured Guest on Apr 26, 2016 14:01:40 GMT
Saying that, all her other shows are always amazing and that's why I look up to her as a role model for aspiring producers. She has two of the biggest talked about musicals arriving this year, Funny Girl and Dreamgirls, both of which has done extremely well at box office already and will be done to a great standard. Well done for a try on BILB but I didn't enjoy it Funny Girl, Dreamgirls, ... Maybe, for instant audience identification and commercial success, BILB should have been called Bend It Girl. And Betty Blue Eyes should perhaps have been Porky Girl. Mrs Henderson Presents ~ Mrs Henderson's GirlsMade in Dagenham ~ Dagenham GirlsStephen Ward ~ Not Really a Girl
wonder.land ~ rabbit-hole.girl
|
|
6,370 posts
|
Post by Jon on Apr 26, 2016 14:09:32 GMT
Good stuff, Jon. On the other hand, shows like "Here To Eternity" has massive nostalgia appeal, and "Desperately Seeking Susan" and "Viva Forever" had the catalogues... hmm... any advance? Viva had a strong advance but once it was apparent that it wasn't very good, it ended up closing early.
|
|
6,370 posts
|
Post by Jon on Apr 26, 2016 14:15:08 GMT
don't think the idea worked very well and a musical made out of it wasn't the grandest idea. She could've invested in better shows. Saying that, all her other shows are always amazing and that's why I look up to her as a role model for aspiring producers. She has two of the biggest talked about musicals arriving this year, Funny Girl and Dreamgirls, both of which has done extremely well at box office already and will be done to a great standard. Well done for a try on BILB but I didn't enjoy it Sonia is a great producer but I think sometimes she does pick 'safe projects' like Hamlet or Harry Potter which would have sold regardless but at the same times, she transfers something like The Nether which was a tough sell but she produced it because she believed it deserved a wider audience.
|
|
521 posts
|
Post by danielwhit on Apr 26, 2016 14:19:58 GMT
don't think the idea worked very well and a musical made out of it wasn't the grandest idea. She could've invested in better shows. Saying that, all her other shows are always amazing and that's why I look up to her as a role model for aspiring producers. She has two of the biggest talked about musicals arriving this year, Funny Girl and Dreamgirls, both of which has done extremely well at box office already and will be done to a great standard. Well done for a try on BILB but I didn't enjoy it Sonia is a great producer but I think sometimes she does pick 'safe projects' like Hamlet or Harry Potter which would have sold regardless but at the same times, she transfers something like The Nether which was a tough sell but she produced it because she believed it deserved a wider audience. It's all about getting the balance I guess - for every risk you need a banker just in case it goes badly wrong.
|
|
521 posts
|
Post by danielwhit on Apr 26, 2016 18:51:17 GMT
for every risk you need a banker just in case it goes badly wrong. Bearing in mind, though, that there are very few bankers in theatre. Even safe shows like "King & I" have lost cash in revival. True - but Hamlet and Harry Potter certainly are two! However yes, and that's why a lot of financers tend to pool their resources fairly thinly.
|
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on Apr 26, 2016 19:09:13 GMT
Viva had a strong advance but once it was apparent that it wasn't very good, it ended up closing early. True, it did burn its advance, didn't it. That did confirm one thing I've always thought, that a great book is the most vital element of a musical.Frankly, I don't buy that. Take Mamma Mia as counter example. A hugely successful show, but the book is paperthin and utterly ridiculous. I mean no-one sees the show just to (not) find out who Sophie's dad is. Mamma Mia is such a success because of the great ABBA songs that all have a unique sound. After the first few bars, you recognise an ABBA song, and most of the songs are familiar to us and you can hum or sing along. The Spice Girls OTOH don't have such a unique sound; actually, all they did was generic pop music similar to many other groups.
|
|
6,370 posts
|
Post by Jon on Apr 26, 2016 19:30:33 GMT
True, it did burn its advance, didn't it. That did confirm one thing I've always thought, that a great book is the most vital element of a musical.Frankly, I don't buy that. Take Mamma Mia as counter example. A hugely successful show, but the book is paperthin and utterly ridiculous. I mean no-one sees the show just to (not) find out who Sophie's dad is. Mamma Mia is such a success because of the great ABBA songs that all have a unique sound. After the first few bars, you recognise an ABBA song, and most of the songs are familiar to us and you can hum or sing along. The Spice Girls OTOH don't have such a unique sound; actually, all they did was generic pop music similar to many other groups. Mamma Mia!'s book isn't the strongest but it works with the songs, likewise with Wicked and Kinky Boots, neither have strong books but it works successfully.
|
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on Apr 26, 2016 19:50:26 GMT
And re Mamma Mia vs. Viva Forever: Maybe I'm a bad example, but I was born in 1984, two years after ABBA had broken up, so I never even had a chance to see them live. On the other hand, I was a teenager during the Spice Girls' heydays. And yet while I can easily give you the names of dozens of ABBA songs and sing and/or hum along, I couldn't even name a single Spice Girl song (true, I'd guess that Viva Forever is one just because the show was named after it).
|
|
|
Post by Seriously on Apr 26, 2016 20:27:29 GMT
I think a lot of people went along to Viva Forever expecting it to be a musical about the Spice Girls.... so they were disappointed even before the woeful plot was started. With Mamma Mia! everyone just wants to hear the songs, so having a "plot" that gently runs along with it all is just an added bonus.
|
|
396 posts
|
Post by djp on Apr 26, 2016 22:51:32 GMT
I think a lot of people went along to Viva Forever expecting it to be a musical about the Spice Girls.... so they were disappointed even before the woeful plot was started. With Mamma Mia! everyone just wants to hear the songs, so having a "plot" that gently runs along with it all is just an added bonus. Mamma has a plot that goes from A to B too,and with a good Sophie and Donna the story can work as well as sound as good as the original Its also made for hen nights and parties. Viva I think got everything wrong. The plot was so bad they forgot it before the end, and they decided not to make it about the Spice Girls - or sound like them - which is dumb if you want Spice Girls fans. i imagine they did it to stop comparisons, and to avoid the question what one Spice Girl ever sang . They then made it even worse by casting the, non band, band, with realistic newcomers to the industry, who sounded like it. You wonder if something based on the real Spice Girl story, with the actual sound, and some of the people playing the girls in the Workshops, would have done far better.
|
|