353 posts
|
Post by cirque on Feb 8, 2019 10:12:56 GMT
Wishing Globe well with this...but being teased as a Gay Play etc.....of course the King/Gaveston relationship is crucial but its also power and explotation,the nature of Kingship and factional Court.....the whole play is vital not just the homosexual nature of King which is not that unusual;-its more about obtaining the power in the ruling body.
|
|
|
Post by learfan on Feb 8, 2019 12:38:28 GMT
Already has a male nudity warning. Im booked for next Thursday night. The RSC are working through the Marlowe canon, so we ought to have another production soon.
|
|
2,859 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by couldileaveyou on Feb 11, 2019 22:31:05 GMT
I saw it tonight and it's a handsome production. The first part is more elegant than deep, and a part from the very fine Tom Stuart and Colin Ryan the acting is quite declamatory and broad. The second act is more visceral and better acted, even if the stage is annoyingly dark at times, especially in the final scene when Edward III restores order. Somehow the production highlights the limits of the text and of Marlowe as a playwright, his notorious difficulty with female characters is here fully articulated in Isabella. The very annoying and unsympathetic Gaveston of Beru Tessema makes us feel for her as the scorned queen but her 180° turn in the second act is a puzzle. We are supposed to believe that there's passion and love between her and Mortimer, but we never see it here. Also I wonder why Edward III is openly ignored when he pleads for his uncle's life but promptly obeyed when he orders Mortimer's execution, we are not told where this change of authority comes from. Still, it's a charming production that highlights the homoerotic elements of the first scenes but remains an intensely political play. Tbh it's a bit awkward how much the globe's website advertises it as a gay play about LGBT issues and stuff, one could think he's about to see an early modern Angels in America.
|
|
406 posts
|
Post by MrBunbury on Feb 11, 2019 22:39:27 GMT
I was there too tonight (two Italians in the theatre). I agree that the second part became more dynamic but I was not bought by Mortimer and Isobel. And I still have the production at the National in my mind where the connection between Edward II and Gaveston was more convincing. The white hot spear at the end is realistic though!
|
|
|
Post by learfan on Feb 15, 2019 22:22:30 GMT
Just out from this. Second half better. Tom Stuart good in title role, katie west also good as Isabella. Rest of ensemble erm mixed. As an aside, the usher volunteer on my door had a strong german accent, as the Globe already have a fearsome rep, this made it worse!!
|
|
294 posts
|
Post by dani on Feb 16, 2019 11:02:20 GMT
Could we change the thread title from Edward 11 to Edward II? Maybe I am alone in being bugged by this.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 7:48:17 GMT
Enjoyed this - back in the style of the early days of the Sam Wanamaker, it's a very clear and straightforward version of the text.
|
|