230 posts
|
Post by hal9000 on Sept 2, 2018 23:47:59 GMT
A story about actor Geoffrey Owens is doing the rounds on social media which is an unusual blends of celebrity, public shaming and the economic realities of a life in the arts.
A woman saw recognised Owens bagging groceries at her local Trader Joe’s (a specialty grocery store). He is a journeyman actor and most famously played the boyfriend of one of the daughters on The Cosby Show. The shopper (ironically named Karma Lawrence) took some snaps and contacted the Daily Mail forthwith. “It made me feel really bad. I was like, “Wow, all those years of doing the show and you ended up as a cashier”.
The good news is that the response to this has been overwhelming support for him as a working man from fellow actors, casting directors and the general public.
The thing is according to his IMDB, Owens works pretty regularly. A spot on Elementary this year, Blacklist, Blue Bloods and Lucifer the year before. He’s a Yale graduate and Shakespeare workshops and drama classes.
One of the dangers of celebrity is how it promotes an image of stars as possessing a lifestyle almost none of them can subsidise on acting alone which in turn makes the completely ordinary event of a working actor having a secondary income source as something shocking.
|
|
|
Post by firefingers on Sept 3, 2018 0:04:27 GMT
Yeah people don't realise how entertainers often have to have a second job to go back to. I remember seeing a metal band play a gig in front of a few thousand people as part of a UK tour, with a new album out and selling well, but the lead singer saying that they worked in a garden centre when not on the road.
|
|
2,041 posts
|
Post by 49thand8th on Sept 3, 2018 0:33:07 GMT
Not to mention his residuals from The Cosby Show may have run out long ago. He wasn't in a starring role there, albeit a regular one — and that was over 20 years ago. Even if he was making good money then, it won't last a lifetime. And we don't know what kind of student loans or other debts he may be dealing with even if his IMDB page is impressive. On a more personal note, I actually used to work at Trader Joe's (they originated in California and most of their stores are there, and there was one very close to where I lived at the time). I can see why, of all retail places, a working actor would go there to pay the bills. Good pay for retail, usually a flexible schedule, good benefits, and the product there is JUST specialty enough where the customers are usually more knowledgable than at a regular supermarket so they're a different kind of difficult.
|
|
19,799 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Sept 3, 2018 7:00:12 GMT
“It made me fee, really bad...” so she went straight into Facebook to share the pics and make everyone else feel bad, presumably 🙄
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Sept 3, 2018 10:35:54 GMT
One of the dangers of celebrity is how it promotes an image of stars as possessing a lifestyle almost none of them can subsidise on acting alone which in turn makes the completely ordinary event of a working actor having a secondary income source as something shocking. Indeed, most people don't realise that even those A-list Hollywood stars on red carpets don't own all of the clothes/jewels/watches they see them wear - most of the time they are on loan! Apparently press reports about star actor earnings are vastly overblown, according to the likes of Jessica Chastain - one of the reasons why the vastly unequal pay between male and female leads went on for so long is that actors don't know what each other are earning. And there's a huge pay gap between white actors and those of colour. She was shocked when she found out what Octavia Spencer was actually getting paid. And that's gross pay - you have to take out all the agents' fees and taxes and other costs of being a freelancer from that. So if even the 'stars' aren't earning as much as they appear to be, how much less does the average jobbing actor have to get by on?!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2018 10:48:34 GMT
Charlotte Wakefield said she was working as a waitress when she found out she got her second Olivier nomination and I believe that she may even be doing some temping work at the moment.
I've seen and heard about a few performers who work as ushers at theatres etc. between jobs. Plus quite a few more will run singing classes, dance classes or be fitness trainers etc. Sasi Strallen is heavily promoting something called Boom Cycle - a new fitness idea she has become a qualified trainer in, I've noticed on twitter.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Sept 3, 2018 10:55:02 GMT
Gosh, even a Strallen needs a second income stream!
|
|
840 posts
|
Post by Steffi on Sept 3, 2018 11:00:36 GMT
I take Barre classes both in London and New York. Several of the instructors are performers who either teach between acting jobs or even teach in the morning and perform in shows in the evening. And why not? We all have to earn a living.
|
|
|
Post by profquatermass on Sept 3, 2018 12:28:34 GMT
I doubt much has changed since the 1970s when Tom Baker was working on a building site when he got the call to be Dr Who
A good place for spotting moderately well-known actors used to be leading guided walks of London
|
|
879 posts
|
Post by daisy24601 on Sept 3, 2018 15:03:23 GMT
Front of House jobs in theatres are a good one as well, most of them are out of work actors! I know a few jobbing actors in London, no one of any fame but money is a constant issue when you don't know here your next income is coming from. The vast majority of actors aren't rich movies stars and so they all need something between jobs to keep afloat.
I wonder for example, what are the stars of Downton Abbey doing right now? Very recognisable faces but some of them could well be doing normal jobs at any given time. It must be annoying when people recognise you and ask stupid questions.
|
|
58 posts
|
Post by carriesparkle on Sept 3, 2018 16:46:05 GMT
Quite. My partner is an actor - he does a lot of driving work. Other actor friends of mine have been teaching assistants, worked FOH, taught dance/singing, waited tables, done flyering, worked retail. Someone self-employed doing work not directly related to their profession/trade is hardly shocking.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2018 17:55:37 GMT
Less visible, as they are rarely recognised, are the number of writers, directors and other production staff who take on other jobs to make ends meet as well. It’s why I tell any student that it isn’t enough to want to be a professional writer, actor etc. You have to need to do it, at the expense of wealth and comfort. Those who do become successful aren’t always who you might expect either. Family who have had similar careers makes it more likely, not particularly through nepotism, but their just being in a situation that others close to them recognise. The dogged hard worker is also often less likely to give up than the mercurial talent, for example, and there are those who just fall into it at the right time. It pays to be talented but it pays even more to be lucky, it’s a crapshoot.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2018 18:14:52 GMT
As above, I’m a writer and dramaturg. Until last year I had a 9-5 “day job” around that. Currently I work as a hospital receptionist. And when term starts I will be doing the odd day of Uni teaching.
It’s a constant battle between “get a proper job again” or “keep enough time to pursue the writing while it seems to be progressing” with the ever present “you’ll be temping forever grow up and get a real job”
Truth is I and lots of others could never be sure we’d never go back to that
|
|
5,068 posts
|
Post by Phantom of London on Sept 3, 2018 18:49:12 GMT
It is a long standing joke in the industry, when someone tells you that they’re an actor, the reply should be “great, but what restaurant do you work for.”
Actors make great waiters, as they can put on a false personality, which is their trade and suits them as they can duck out at short notice for auditions. Acting is definitely a long stick, with a very small carrot and it is a famine or feast business.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Sept 3, 2018 19:25:25 GMT
The realities of the industry just don’t get talked about enough.
Did anyone see that documentary David Harewood did for Sky a while ago? It was called the F Word, ‘f’ being ‘failure’. He talked to a lot of actors about their difficulties dealing with failure and underemployment in the industry.
|
|
5,068 posts
|
Post by Phantom of London on Sept 3, 2018 20:02:28 GMT
|
|
1,134 posts
|
Post by Stephen on Sept 3, 2018 22:46:42 GMT
I've worked with some terrific actors FOH in theatres. In fact, out of my actor friends, the smartest and most switched on ones do work FOH when they're between jobs or having a slow time with auditions. I think it keeps them humble as well as alive!
|
|
1,972 posts
|
Post by sf on Sept 4, 2018 0:46:19 GMT
The shopper (ironically named Karma Lawrence) took some snaps and contacted the Daily Mail forthwith. “It made me feel really bad. I was like, “Wow, all those years of doing the show and you ended up as a cashier”. How lucky for us all that Ms. Lawrence recovered her composure quickly enough to think of sending the pictures off to the Daily Mail so the rest of the world could share her judgmental sneer at Mr. Owens. I'm sure she's a lovely, lovely person. He's hardly the first person to have to take a job to pay the bills/get or maintain health insurance/both. Good luck to him.
|
|
230 posts
|
Post by hal9000 on Sept 4, 2018 2:28:40 GMT
Is Karma’s A Bitch too easy a label for her? On a happier note, something called Shakespeare Magazine has linked to his drama workshops and relayed the positive feedback of previous attendees:
|
|
230 posts
|
Post by hal9000 on Sept 4, 2018 2:46:46 GMT
Apparently press reports about star actor earnings are vastly overblown, according to the likes of Jessica Chastain - one of the reasons why the vastly unequal pay between male and female leads went on for so long is that actors don't know what each other are earning. And there's a huge pay gap between white actors and those of colour. She was shocked when she found out what Octavia Spencer was actually getting paid. And that's gross pay - you have to take out all the agents' fees and taxes and other costs of being a freelancer from that. So if even the 'stars' aren't earning as much as they appear to be, how much less does the average jobbing actor have to get by on?! On this note, Taraji P. Henson got her first Oscar nomination for Benjamin Button. In her memoir (another worthwhile side hustle!) she wrote that she came close to making a net loss on the film partially because with her salary of $100,000 she only saw a fraction of that but because she had to pay for her own accomodation for the long shoot in Louisiana. And this wasn’t an indie, but Paramount-produced Oscar bait with a budget over $150 million! She wrote that people can talk about knowing their own value when it comes to salary but they do from a position of privilege. She mentioned that as there are many black actresses over 30 going for the few high quality roles that producers will cast them in, supply outstrips demand, so the filmmakers, in this case no less than Kennedy/Marshall and David Fincher, know they can save money on her wage because someone else just as good will step in.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2018 8:07:13 GMT
I used to work for a technology company and our London office support team was almost entirely made up of musical theatre actors. After we found the first one to be our office manager, she introduced us to several others. We ended up with a rotating cast of brilliant people who would all fill in for each other. “Louise is doing Babes in the Wood so I’m filling in for her” and so on.
So much better than using temps from an agency. And every single one of them was a glorious human being.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2018 9:03:05 GMT
I used to work for a technology company and our London office support team was almost entirely made up of musical theatre actors. After we found the first one to be our office manager, she introduced us to several others. We ended up with a rotating cast of brilliant people who would all fill in for each other. “Louise is doing Babes in the Wood so I’m filling in for her” and so on. So much better than using temps from an agency. And every single one of them was a glorious human being. And speaking from the other side of the fence I could genuinely cry at the thought of finding a company so welcoming to that. And who appreciate what performers (and other creatives) bring to a 'day job' if they're treated well/valued. It's a great frustration that many of us are relegated to minimum wage/retail/hospitality jobs when in fact we have so much to offer (even as temps) to other roles.
|
|
196 posts
|
Post by rockinrobin on Sept 4, 2018 11:07:59 GMT
That's awful. That woman's reaction, I mean.
My boyfriend's brother is an actor. He's always had another job. When he was in his 20s, he was spending summers doing various seasonal jobs (anything, from painting fences to picking fruit) on a farm in France for a couple of years. Many of his colleagues were doing the same back then - theatre salaries were (and still are) ridiculously low. Since then, he's been teaching, working in the radio (OK, that's not really far from acting but still), working in PR. He is now 50, one might say he's been fairly successful - not a celebrity but has been in films, tv shows, still does theatre. But - he's still out of the job sometimes and he has two children; one of them is ill. He basically needs a stable source of income (and acting isn't one, even for someone recognizable) because, well, kids need food from time to time, and his kid also needs a costly therapy. It's romantic to be an actor, but there's nothing romantic in not being able to pay your bills or provide for your children. And after all, it's perfectly normal and not unusual to do something else than you've been trained to do and/or have been known for doing - we all need to earn money, dust isn't really calorie-high and we don't want to live with our parents until we're 48. For example, I'm a journalist. I work in a bank. It happens to all of us. We sometimes need to... adapt. As they say in my country - if you don't have what you like, you like what you have. Nothing wrong about it. And certainly nothing to feel bad about, dear ms/mrs Karma Lawrence.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Sept 4, 2018 11:38:02 GMT
I used to work for a technology company and our London office support team was almost entirely made up of musical theatre actors. After we found the first one to be our office manager, she introduced us to several others. We ended up with a rotating cast of brilliant people who would all fill in for each other. “Louise is doing Babes in the Wood so I’m filling in for her” and so on. So much better than using temps from an agency. And every single one of them was a glorious human being. And speaking from the other side of the fence I could genuinely cry at the thought of finding a company so welcoming to that. And who appreciate what performers (and other creatives) bring to a 'day job' if they're treated well/valued. It's a great frustration that many of us are relegated to minimum wage/retail/hospitality jobs when in fact we have so much to offer (even as temps) to other roles. We've had a few temps from the creative industries - we had one this summer who left for a job at the RSC. Another one left to make a documentary, and has since been back again for a short time. And we've had a permanent member of staff go on sabbatical to act in a (French) film.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2018 11:52:17 GMT
And speaking from the other side of the fence I could genuinely cry at the thought of finding a company so welcoming to that. And who appreciate what performers (and other creatives) bring to a 'day job' if they're treated well/valued. It's a great frustration that many of us are relegated to minimum wage/retail/hospitality jobs when in fact we have so much to offer (even as temps) to other roles. We've had a few temps from the creative industries - we had one this summer who left for a job at the RSC. Another one left to make a documentary, and has since been back again for a short time. And we've had a permanent member of staff go on sabbatical to act in a (French) film. That's brilliant! unfortunately I've never been anything but sneered at for having another career outside whatever I'm doing. Which is a shame because actually in general companies should be more open minded about what temps of all kind bring- they might accidentally find the perfect person for something without realising it! Though funny enough, someone in my very first temp job had left to join the RSC and another fellow temp, who also went to RADA at the same time as me, is now a TV director for the BBC. So three of us escaped a life there.... Saying that my current job are slightly less sneery about it. Unfortunately it's not one where I can use any skills (other than personal restraint in holding back physical violence towards total cockwombles haha)
|
|