5,837 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Mar 8, 2018 23:10:55 GMT
Interesting news from Baz.
Tom Hooper to direct Lin Manuel Miranda to play Lee
I am somewhat excited by this. Boding well...
|
|
543 posts
|
Post by freckles on Mar 9, 2018 12:29:41 GMT
OOh, two of my favourite things combined (His Dark Materials & LMM!). Although I pictured Lee Scoresby as a bit older and world-weary, I'm sure LMM will be amazing. Dafne Keen to play Lyra, who seems perfect. I'm excited too, but hope it's better than the movie...
|
|
5,837 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Mar 9, 2018 12:32:49 GMT
It can't be worse than the movie that is for sure.
I still treasure the BBC radio adaptations - very evocative.
And if you are looking for something special, I can thoroughly recommended the new audiobook of La Belle Sauvage (The Book of Dust). Michael Sheen (who I normally do not like at all) does an incredible job with it. His accents, his narrative drive, his control of pacing in the action sequences - all perfect. I still have 4 chapters to do and am rationing them - because it is so tense (and I don't know quite how it will play out) and because I don't want it to end.
Probably the best thing I have ever got from Audible.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 9, 2018 12:49:19 GMT
Lee Scoresby as a bit older and world-weary They had the guy from the Big Lebowski in the film, Sam Elliot, who I thought was perfect. Not sure how this one will work. I'm interested to see who'll they'll cast as Lord Asriel, as there does seem to be a dearth of middle-aged actors of that type at the moment - Cillian Murphy's too pretty and Tom Hardy's too gruff. I thought the second and third books were a bit of a mess to be honest, and I know the lack of a second film was attributed to the religious right, but I did wonder how they'd film them as the storyline was all over the place.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 9, 2018 13:19:57 GMT
8 hour-long episodes, according to Jack Thorne on Twitter.
|
|
341 posts
|
Post by adrianics on Mar 9, 2018 13:21:38 GMT
The film is garbage but I saw Part One of the NT production many years back and it was amazing; it had a young Dominic Cooper and Russell Tovey as Will and Roger, and Timothy Dalton (spectacular) as Azrael. I think it'll make a good miniseries, and although Tom Hooper is one of the most overrated filmmakers alive his John Adams miniseries was excellent.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2018 13:25:21 GMT
Oh no, please don't say Jack Thorne is involved, what an overrated hack.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 9, 2018 13:46:28 GMT
Yes, that was good - and one of those welcome times when an excellent actor normally relegated to character roles gets to play the lead. Timothy Dalton is underrated, too! I'd love to have seen the NT production - it was on during my too skint/too anxious/too untogether to get see plays period.
|
|
185 posts
|
Post by boybooshka on Mar 9, 2018 14:02:47 GMT
Oh no, please don't say Jack Thorne is involved, what an overrated hack. I couldn't possibly disagree more, he is responsible for two of the best things I've seen in the last couple of years, National Treasure and The Solid Life of Sugar Water. Glad to hear that there is finally movement on this, I've been waiting with baited breathe since they announced it.
|
|
5,837 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Mar 9, 2018 14:14:25 GMT
For me, it will come down to how effective the daemons are. The puppetry in the NT version was great - but in the film I was less convinced - particularly as the short run time didn't give enough space to allow them to fully emerge. The whole daemon concept fascinates me - and done well should entrance an audience.
La Belle Sauvage has great sections about baby daemons - shows Pullman has really thought about his universe in detail.
Basically I want a daemon. And I want one now!
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 9, 2018 14:42:38 GMT
The whole daemon concept fascinates me I don't know - for a writer who rejects religion, it's odd that he uses such a biblical concept of man vs all other animals, rather than regarding humans as just another animal, and I find the idea that your personality is fluid in childhood but becomes fixed in puberty very reductive and depressing. He often vents his fury at C. S. Lewis, particularly for the way the children can no longer visit Narnia once they become teenagers, and the way Susan is expelled forever for wearing lipstick and nylons, but that seems just as bad.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2018 23:46:39 GMT
Sam Elliott was perfect as Lee Scorsby on the film, that big tash and texan drawl...I really dont see LMM in that part at all. I can't really remember many of the daemons names, but as soon as i think of Lee, i think of Hestor...
La Belle Sauvage (The Book of Dust) was beautiful. Maybe it could have had a chapter or 2 cut, but it was beautifully written but SO frustrating when you know there are still another 2 parts to come. I wish they could have all been released togather!
|
|
5,837 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Mar 10, 2018 0:12:13 GMT
Sam Elliott was perfect as Lee Scorsby on the film, that big tash and texan drawl...I really dont see LMM in that part at all. I can't really remember many of the daemons names, but as soon as i think of Lee, i think of Hestor... La Belle Sauvage (The Book of Dust) was beautiful. Maybe it could have had a chapter or 2 cut, but it was beautifully written but SO frustrating when you know there are still another 2 parts to come. I wish they could have all been released togather! What is intriguing me is that book 2 takes place after the original trilogy with Lyra as a student...
|
|
1,248 posts
|
Post by joem on Mar 11, 2018 0:59:42 GMT
The NT adaptations were superb. BBC could do a lot worse than have David Harewood reprising his Lord Asriel. My worry is they will make this "small": another of those three or four part series which leaves you rueing a missed opportunity.
His Dark Materials is a big story and deserves to be given the full Lord of the Rings, HBO treatment. Not vicars drinking tepid tea and making polite conversation about the weather behind chintz curtains where the aspidistra flies.
|
|
5,837 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Mar 11, 2018 1:44:14 GMT
They are giving 8 episodes to the first book - so I think they are giving it the big treatment.
Get it right and they can make something really iconic. Something that is still being watched 30/40 years on.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2018 9:51:49 GMT
I'm excited - cautiously - about this. I love the books. I never saw the NT productions because I was too young to make my own decision to go and pay for myself. I was aware of them though, and have always since thought of Anna Maxwell Martin as Lyra, even though I never saw her. I have a CD set which I love as a bedtime book, with a full cast and Phillip Pullman narrating - I really like that, although I don't like the Will in the middle book (they swapped him for book 3). I have no idea what Lin Manuel Miranda is like - he doesn't look like Lee to me, but we'll see.
The film was so disappointing! I quite liked Lyra, the Gyptians were pretty much how I imagined, and Lee was really good, but otherwise, bleh. It was all far too timid and cut down and messed around with.
Edit: OMG I've just googled, and the NT version was in 2004? I wasn't far too young at all, and I was going to the theatre regularly by then, so I have no idea why I didn't go. I wasn't going to London theatre then, maybe that's why. How odd - in my head, they were on donkeys years ago!
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 11, 2018 10:05:30 GMT
8 episodes to the first book That seems a lot for a children's book - The Hobbit was stretched out to something like that and it was far too long. The BBC Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell was 7 hours, but it's a long book - War and Peace and the upcoming Les Miserables are 6 hours.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2018 10:07:16 GMT
I thought I read it was 8 episodes for the whole trilogy, which conversely doesn't sound like quite enough.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2018 10:12:55 GMT
8 episodes to the first book That seems a lot for a children's book - The Hobbit was stretched out to something like that and it was far too long. The BBC Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell was 7 hours, but it's a long book - War and Peace and the upcoming Les Miserables are 6 hours. I think there's far more to them than "a children's book" and 8 hours per book seems good to me. I agree that 8 hours is way too much for The Hobbit, but HDM is much bigger than The Hobbit in my opinion.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 11, 2018 10:55:46 GMT
far more to them than "a children's book" Yes, but it could fall between two stools - the religion/sin/Milton/heaven aspect, which, to be honest, didn't appeal to me much as an adult reader and I'm sure would have bored or confused me as a child (are there any children who name The Last Battle as their favourite C. S. Lewis? We did it in school aged 10 and we all hated it!)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2018 11:24:50 GMT
The Last Battle is crap though! It's far too simplistic and patronising.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 11, 2018 11:36:37 GMT
It's the C.S. Lewis that most reminds me of Pullman though, along with The Silver Chair, and the one he addresses when he criticises Lewis for casting Susan out of Narnia for her sexuality.
|
|
1,248 posts
|
Post by joem on Mar 11, 2018 12:07:54 GMT
8 episodes to the first book That seems a lot for a children's book - The Hobbit was stretched out to something like that and it was far too long. The BBC Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell was 7 hours, but it's a long book - War and Peace and the upcoming Les Miserables are 6 hours. You cannot do full justice to War and Peace in six hours. The tv series for The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie with Geraldine McEwan (which I don't recall as feeling overlong) was SEVEN hours long! The film with Maggie Smith was two hours. All this from a novella with around 150 pages, about 10% the length of War and Peace. Done properly the BBC could make a lot of money from this worldwide. If you abridge a novel severely to do it in a few parts, presumably for financial reasons, you end up serving as an appetiser for one of the big US boys to then do it properly and leave the BBC adaptation as a curious relic for aficionados rather than THE go-to way tosee thw work. 8 hours for the first Pullmann novel is not bad.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2018 12:34:23 GMT
I’ve seen three different productions of the play version (NT, Birmingham Rep and a youth theatre version) as I desperately want it to work but each time it has come up short.
The issue is that the adaptation includes too much action within its six hours or so running time. It’s breathless and, as such, ends up being a shallower experience than it should be, There are interesting philosophical ideas in the stories that need time to breathe, to have characters just stop, think and relate their lives to something much larger.
Eight hours for three books? I fear that we would see the same problem, although screen storytelling can sometimes use shorthand techniques that might alleviate that. Eight hours for the first book would be just about right.
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 11, 2018 12:43:36 GMT
8 hours for the first Pullmann novel is not bad. Depends how it's scheduled - young people are used to bingewatching in one go. Would it work if strung out over 8 weeks in a 7pm or 8pm slot? Part of the appeal of GoT is that most viewers don't know the plot, and no-one knows how it'll end, and here they do. It also has more varied characters and situations - if you don't like this group of people or setting, don't worry, another one will be along in a minute.
|
|