3,580 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Oct 20, 2017 4:27:00 GMT
Some people will already have seen this (not sure it was at LFF but previews, etc), but for those who, like me, had to wait for the general release and as it looks like the biggest opening of the week (cue comment from @ryan?), I'm starting a thread. Will add my thoughts after seeing it tomorrow.
|
|
5,707 posts
|
Post by lynette on Oct 20, 2017 11:32:23 GMT
Reviews are excellent. Looks like a cracker. I’ll wait for the dvd or Netflix.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2017 11:39:59 GMT
It does sound great - am thinking of seeing it tonight as it's on at a cinema just round the corner from where I work so I can get to the 6pm showing and still be in bed by 930pm, which is how I like to rock Friday nights...!
|
|
2,062 posts
|
Post by Marwood on Oct 20, 2017 13:21:29 GMT
I'm going to see it tomorrow night at Curzon Mayfair followed by a Q&A with Armando Ianucci - I read a review online earlier in the week by someone saying that Stalin is such a terrible man, there should never be a comedy made about him, and how there would be riots in Britain if the same sort of film was made about Churchill.
The fact that A) he had obviously never heard of Churchill: The Hollywood Years (which was offensively bad rather than just plain offensive, but didn't start an outbreak of 'Down With This Kind Of Thing' protests outside cinemas let alone a riot) and B) was Brazilian, that world renowned source of film comedy masterclasses over the years made me think he had totally lost the point of the film - if we'd gone along with this line of thinking, we never would have got films like The Producers either.
|
|
3,580 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Oct 20, 2017 15:08:21 GMT
The Curzon Q & A did sound appealing but Saturday evening is not great scheduling from the viewpoint of keen theatregoers & I already had my 2 plays booked so will go to an early performance of the film, before the matinee. Do please report back, though, Marwood! Plus my last attempt to see a Q & A at Curzon Mayfair was chaos: we were kept waiting and waiting until there was eventually an announcement about a technical hitch and a further, official delay of up to another hour (at this point the film should have been well under way), at which point I and quite a few others elected to obtain a refund and leave. The director who had come to do the Q & A also had to leave; moreover, from the email I later received they weren't able to show the film even belatedly. But I am sure that was an untypical experience.
|
|
|
Post by profquatermass on Oct 21, 2017 12:50:08 GMT
The poster is interesting - no SRB even though he has at least half an hour more screen time than Rupert Friend and Jason Isaacs.
|
|
2,062 posts
|
Post by Marwood on Oct 22, 2017 0:01:54 GMT
The poster is interesting - no SRB even though he has at least half an hour more screen time than Rupert Friend and Jason Isaacs. The poster they had up at the Curzon tonight (about half a dozen of them, but that is to be expected when the director is there) had SRB billed second behind Steve Buscemi, maybe they've made different posters for different regions? I wouldn't go as far as say its been the most highly rated film of the year so far (as it was introduced prior to the screening), but I enjoyed it: not a laugh a minute film, more the sort of film you smile along with while watching it and when the proper laughs come along, they are more hearty chuckles than roars of laughter (there was an annoying eejit sat somewhere behind me who kept going overboard with loud HAHAHAHAHAs at every opportunity for the first 40-50 minutes) Not sure how much business this is expected to rake in (can't see it getting screened on hundreds of screens in the US or doing amazing business in multiplexes worldwide) but I was entertained, it was well acted all round (kudos to Paul Whitehouse and Jeffrey Tambor in particular), and you don't have to have an in-depth knowledge of the USSR to understand whats going and enjoy it: five minutes of this had more laughs than the (what seemed like an extremely long) 71 minutes of The Party, and unlike Blade Runner 2049, I never drifted off to sleep (always a bonus in a cinema unless you're homeless and have wandered in off the street to doss down in a cinema).
|
|
3,580 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Oct 22, 2017 5:10:12 GMT
I enjoyed this but didn't think it was the 5-star masterpiece some have claimed; it was instead for me a perfectly decent 4-star film though not my usual genre (if it's even possible to say which applies in this case), with a great cast whose interaction provides the main pleasure. I particularly liked seeing SRB as a villain for once and wonder if he also relished the opportunity, as he generally seems to specialise in tortured geniuses or at least decent men grappling with moral dilemmas. Perhaps I'm too cynical but I didn't agree with the R4 reviewer who called it "a savage satire"; maybe the truth is already too bizarre for that to be possible.
|
|
587 posts
|
Post by Polly1 on Oct 22, 2017 11:12:25 GMT
Re. the poster, yes, SRB is named (the cast is listed in alphabetical order) but his picture isn't on it. So I was amazed to find he has one of the biggest roles, in fact the film revolves around him and he is of course, superb. At last, a film role worthy of his talents! He is certainly not in the 'twinkly' mode of which he is sometimes accused.
Overall the film was brilliantly done but I think they put all the best jokes in the trailer (apart from moving the body which was funny). Shout out for Michael Palin, who is great, and also theatre stalwart Paul Chahidi.
Oh, and I recognised staircase and the gents loos at the Freemasons Hall from my visit to Letters Live!!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2017 12:58:23 GMT
Finally caught this and really enjoyed it – not quite as funny or clever as it thinks it is, but better than most things I end up seeing at the cinema and definitely one of those things it’s worth seeing on the screen rather than waiting for TV. Jason Isaacs really stand out funny and whoever thinks that SRB is too nice and cuddly to do evil convincingly should see this – those cold, terrifying eyes… Agree that it's fabulous to see him get a screen role worthy of him.
Side point – whatever bad behaviour you get in the theatre is nothing compared to a Soho Curzon audience on a Friday night – god, the continuous chomp and rustle! Though on the plus side, the endless standing up and sitting down again to let people in and out has probably done wonders for my thigh muscles.
|
|