578 posts
|
Post by michalnowicki on Sept 9, 2017 8:06:10 GMT
Oh gosh, now I'm wondering whether not to see this after all; I don't want to sit there squirming as I did during Weekend. Any advice from those who have seen it, please? Just see it. Worst case scenario you won't like it, but that's a risk you're taking with every show you're seeing. Plus, cinema tickets are not as expensive as West End tickets. Hope you'll like it!
|
|
722 posts
|
Post by hulmeman on Sept 9, 2017 8:10:03 GMT
|
|
644 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by jek on Sept 11, 2017 15:26:41 GMT
I thought this was terrific. Especially loved seeing Gemma Jones (remembered from my youth as The Duchess of Duke Street) and Ian Hart in fine grumpy form. My partner's uncle is a struggling hill farmer in Wales and the bleakness really rung true. Of course it was impossible not to wonder if success could be achieved with selling artisan sheep's cheese!
Here in East London tickets for our local Picturehouse for members are £5.50. We also go to the Barbican quite a bit where there are good membership deals. Even the new and very swish Curzon Aldgate does off peak for around about a tenner. I prefer to see things in the cinema not just because of the atmosphere although that does often add something to the experience but also because at home I always feel the need to combine watching with doing the ironing or the like. It's good to have no distractions.
|
|
47 posts
|
Post by prophet on Sept 11, 2017 20:39:59 GMT
I saw this today. I thought it was lush. It was slow to start with but in the end I really started to care for the main guys.
The cinema I went to was freezing cold and that really helped set the scene (or so I told myself.) I didn't see any epilogue? Anyone care to spill?
|
|
47 posts
|
Post by prophet on Sept 11, 2017 20:41:35 GMT
My ticket for the cinema was 4.99
|
|
4,215 posts
|
Post by anthony40 on Sept 11, 2017 21:49:10 GMT
It's great tht you got a cheap ticket but what about the film? Did you enjoy it?
|
|
47 posts
|
Post by prophet on Sept 12, 2017 6:50:58 GMT
It's great tht you got a cheap ticket but what about the film? Did you enjoy it? I liked it- I reviewed it briefly on page three of the thread
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2017 8:12:08 GMT
I found this a beautiful little film. There is a stillness about it, a sparse script, and an absence of an annoying soundtrack which we’ve grown used to, dictating our feelings towards the characters and their situations. Here we are left to make our own judgements. Patrick Wolf’s The Days plays over the closing credits, and we are shown a montage of old films, full of colour, celebrating the farming communities of old, like something out of Merrie England. It’s quite a contrast to what we’ve just seen…
The film depicts the hard lives of farmers in the north of England. The elements are bleak like the landscape. There’s an isolated farmhouse and a dilapidated caravan for the Romanian farmhand who arrives to help out. He gifted like a modern day Gabriel Oak; he will teach sullen warrior Johnny that he needs to stop for a second to appreciate the Beauty which is all too often right under your very nose. Alec Secarenu, unknown to me, plays the gypsy lad (“Please don’t call me that…”); Josh O’Connor, a kind of poor man’s Russell Tovey, and unrecognisable really from his TV role as Lawrence Durrell plays Johnny. Both are superb.
Like other posters, I too remember Gemma Jones from her Duchess of Duke Street days. She crops up in smaller roles now; she was marvellous in Marvellous a few years back, and here she is just as good playing the grandmother doing her best to cope with her ailing son (Ian Hart) and good-for-nothing grandson whose vomit and used condoms she’s in the habit of clearing up.
Never have a few wild daffodils in a jam-jar looked so romantic; never have the words Thank You been uttered with such poignancy; never has a journey to Scotland on a National Express bus seemed a matter of life and death. But it is.
We gradually warm to these unsmiling characters. We’re on their side. We want them to win, as this unusual romance blossoms over- of all things- a Pot Noodle.
I understand that this small scale film has gambolled its way into mainstream cinemas, gaining a much wider audience than it was perhaps intended for. It’s done it quietly, like some of the best things do.
It’s certainly a thing of delicate, brutal beauty.
|
|
722 posts
|
Post by hulmeman on Sept 13, 2017 9:33:12 GMT
It’s certainly a thing of delicate, brutal beauty. What a marvellous summary of this film.
|
|
100 posts
|
Post by noboiscout on Sept 13, 2017 12:50:27 GMT
Stunning performances from all. Josh O'Connor has the air or Frankenstein's monster, who literally has to be taken by the hand and slowly taught how to love - and allow himself to be loved. I've seen it 4 times now, and while that's starting to verge on the obsessive, trust me - it was worth it. Can't recommend this film enough.
|
|
3,580 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Sept 13, 2017 13:03:34 GMT
So not much dialogue, then? After my sojourn in the cultural desert, I have a backlog of films (this one, Insyriated, Final Portrait, Wind River and Limehouse Golem, in no particular order) to see and there are new releases from Friday, so I need to prioritise ruthlessly. Plus some of them are a bit heavy so I don't want too many long, serious films in one day.
|
|
3,580 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Sept 14, 2017 4:00:59 GMT
Well, I've booked 4 films in succession for today, including this one, which is going to be a rush and tough on my poor posterior. However, all are "free" (included in my prepaid Curzon membership), so a far better use both of my time (while on holiday in Northumberland, I spent all day going to Newcastle and back and managed one film) and resources. I didn't mind paying £6 to see Patti Cakes at a Cineworld but that's about my limit on the occasions when I do have to pay - generally in London. So if God's Own Country doesn't grab me, one or more of the other films probably will.
|
|
3,580 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Sept 14, 2017 21:45:47 GMT
As the audience left the auditorium after the screening of God's Own Country, I overheard 2 ladies discussing the film. One said she hadn't been so disappointed by a film in ages and her hopes had been raised by the reviews but that it was very heavy-handed with every plot development so clearly signalled; she then apologised to her friend for suggesting they see it.
I did think she had a point (as when she went on to say that it didn't help that one of the protagonists was "unprepossessing"), but I wasn't disappointed as I'd been prepared for the worst. I liked the fact that there was no intrusive soundtrack; indeed, there was very little music at all so what there was seemed more significant. In places the action was too graphic and prolonged for me and although I'm straight and female, I'd say that about any on-screen or on-stage intimacy as I think those things are private and more powerful if merely hinted at and the rest left to the imagination.
The scenery might have appeared more attractive at another time of year but it wasn't a travelogue and the farming background, and animal husbandry in particular, seemed horribly grim and realistic. Not sure I agree with the disappointed lady's comment that "It was the oldies who saved it, really", but Gemma Jones certainly had a good part and made the most of it.
All in all this reminded me partly of Withnail And I and partly of another recent film about a son with ageing parents living in some rural hell-hole; I can't recall the title but I'm sure others here can.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Sept 15, 2017 20:24:57 GMT
Well, I loved this film. Beautiful, aching with pain and loneliness and the desperate need for human connection.
It managed to avoid sentimentality and provide a satisfying (open-ended) conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2017 16:29:23 GMT
I enjoyed this, but not quite as much as I expected to I don't think. Something about gay films can really get to me like Moonlight did and like I expect Call Me By Your Name will after reading the book. This didn't quite do that, but it was effective nonetheless. The performances were mostly good with a few dodgy line readings, although I can imagine some of the dialogue wouldn't be the easiest to pull off. I wish the central relationship had been developed a little bit more. I understand that the point is that the main character can't or wont voice his feelings, but even a few more non-sexual physical scenes would have done nicely. They had a great chemistry that I felt like we didn't see enough of. I could have done with less of the older actors and more of the younger. I also wish there'd been a bit more of a score, I found it relieving to hear music at the end and think it could have added a lot, it doesn't need to be overdone. Nice to see a mainstream film about gay men that doesn't shy away from nudity and sex scenes (unlike lesbian films made by straight men that often overdo them) and that has a happy ending.
4*
|
|
32 posts
|
Post by oldstager on Oct 1, 2017 14:17:17 GMT
Unlike some posters I thought this was superior in every way to the overrated "Moonlight". It was painfully honest and believable and beautifully acted and directed throughout. My interest and involvement never faltered. The bleakness never felt forced and the understatement and economic use of dialogue added to the emotional impact of the movie. There is a strong case for expression of drama in film without the use of words - that is, after all, how the medium was first used. And there are occasions in both life and art where mere words are inadequate. As a character in an early Alan Bennett play once said; "Words fail me. But then they often do". I await the DVD release so that I can watch it again whenever I need a reminder of the power of a truly visual medium when used properly.
|
|
722 posts
|
Post by hulmeman on Oct 18, 2017 18:32:02 GMT
Saw this again today and like a good painting or cartoon, I noticed things I missed first time round. It was joyous and my companion for today who is not a sentimental man admitted to a moist eye and a lovely feeling as we left the cinema.
|
|
1,348 posts
|
Post by tmesis on Oct 27, 2017 18:29:09 GMT
I thought this was very good. There are some wonderful performances, obviously Josh O' Connor (how different from his louche performance in The Durrells!) and Alec Secareanu but also Gemma Jones was superb and Ian Hart was very moving. Josh, all repressed, inarticulate emotion, gives a fabulous performance and the ending is very touching.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Dec 3, 2017 15:50:19 GMT
I finally got to see the film this morning and was very impressed.
So many lovely touches in the direction, the muted colour palette, the atmosphere beautifully captured. The performances were excellent - O'Connor could say so much without using a single word. I could sense his frustration and his fear. He had never been taught how to love before - that pain was so real.
I was particularly glad with the tone of the ending. It could so easily have gone another way.
Top work
|
|
722 posts
|
Post by hulmeman on Jan 4, 2018 22:55:36 GMT
Josh O'Connor has been nominated for a rising star award in the BAFTA's. You can vote! bit.ly/2CRuldg
|
|
369 posts
|
Post by Jonnyboy on Mar 31, 2018 20:52:14 GMT
Now on Netflix if anyone’s interested. Looking forward to watching it!
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Mar 31, 2018 21:20:32 GMT
Oh excellent! I know what I’m watching tomorrow.
|
|
134 posts
|
Post by spendleb on Apr 5, 2018 10:56:58 GMT
Hated this, so bleak (I'm from beautiful Yorkshire and incidentally also gay), was I meant to feel something for the central character? I hated him, I think I stopped watching when he disappeared into the toilet for sex when the guy he was meant to be in love with was sat waiting in the pub. Not for me
|
|
3,040 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Apr 5, 2018 11:16:09 GMT
£5.10 in poor Wales is equivalent to £13.50 in affluent Harrogate But in poor Merseyside it's nearly £13 too, both at the plush Picturehouse and the bog-standard multiplex by the retail park in the middle of nowhere! That's more than the price of a studio theatre or main house preview ticket!
|
|
19,803 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Apr 5, 2018 17:22:13 GMT
Hated this, so bleak (I'm from beautiful Yorkshire and incidentally also gay), was I meant to feel something for the central character? I hated him, I think I stopped watching when he disappeared into the toilet for sex when the guy he was meant to be in love with was sat waiting in the pub. Not for me As Bet Lynch once famously said to Rita Fairclough “Men? They’re all bastards, even the good ‘uns”.
|
|