1,239 posts
|
Post by nash16 on Nov 18, 2016 0:20:47 GMT
Of *all* the things The Old Vic could transfer to the West End But it's awful! (she's not bad, but the rest of it…) How is this allowed to happen? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2016 0:44:29 GMT
Of *all* the things The Old Vic could transfer to the West End But it's awful! (she's not bad, but the rest of it…) How is this allowed to happen? Because it's strongly cast People want to see Glenda Jackson It's SOLD OUT And it got very good reviews Remaining tickets went for £100 plus based on the dynamic pricing All of the above despite the sniping on this forum It may surprise you But the fortunes of producers aren't related to or affected by predictions or comments here |
|
1,239 posts
|
Post by nash16 on Nov 18, 2016 3:28:00 GMT
But it's awful! (she's not bad, but the rest of it…) How is this allowed to happen? Because it's strongly cast People want to see Glenda Jackson It's SOLD OUT And it got very good reviews Remaining tickets went for £100 plus based on the dynamic pricing All of the above despite the sniping on this forum It may surprise you But the fortunes of producers aren't related to or affected by predictions or comments here Strongly MIScast. E.g. Why is Miss Babs playing Goneril with a wink and a smile? DIG Celia. Dig deep and you shall find a character that is not actually like you. Play that! |
|
1,119 posts
|
Post by martin1965 on Nov 18, 2016 6:24:14 GMT
As Parsley says despite the comments here all the reviews ive seen have been good. With Jacksons name in the states a broadway transfer was always on the cards, not surprised at all. Im going next wed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2016 10:14:43 GMT
Boom! G.Jack is BACK baby!
|
|
1,936 posts
|
Post by wickedgrin on Nov 18, 2016 11:03:07 GMT
Yes, a huge shame she ever went away.
|
|
617 posts
|
Post by loureviews on Nov 19, 2016 11:06:39 GMT
For all the sniping here this is certainly not awful and if it gets a transfer, good!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2016 11:13:33 GMT
Extra matinee added on 26 Nov, on sale midday on Monday
|
|
|
|
Post by crabtree on Nov 19, 2016 13:49:14 GMT
Full marks for Glenda having the stamina and the memory for coming back to the stage and this age, let alone to play Lear. A brilliant actor.
Interesting the comment about Celia Imrie above, as the reviews have not really mentioned her.
|
|
270 posts
|
Post by littlesally on Nov 20, 2016 0:24:55 GMT
A phenomenal, shattering performance from GJ in a wonderful production. Too many stand outs to mention but do agree that Celia Imrie misjudged this spectacularly. Dinnerladies all over again!
|
|
547 posts
|
Post by drmaplewood on Nov 21, 2016 12:05:44 GMT
Extra matinee added on 26 Nov, on sale midday on Monday Thanks for this, booked. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2016 20:42:54 GMT
What's with the Celia hate?  I thought she and Jane Horrocks were *fabulous* |
|
2,859 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by couldileaveyou on Nov 21, 2016 21:14:26 GMT
She was alright, nothing to write home about. They were just too old, Jane was trying to be a milf and when Glenda told Celia that she will never have a child the woman behind me giggled and whispered "too late for that, love"
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2016 21:48:55 GMT
It is too often a problem with the casting of Goneril IMO… The fact that the whole Lear-cursing-her-potential-pregnancy thing comes up makes it clear that she should be in her late 30s/early 40s, and Regan probably early 30s (newly married), and Cordelia in her early 20s… Goneril has way too often been cast as a 50/60 year old, even going back to Dorothy Tutin
|
|
433 posts
|
Post by DuchessConstance on Nov 22, 2016 17:20:02 GMT
The Michael Pennington tour earlier this year cast all three sisters young (not sure how old but the actresses playing Regan and Goneril looked around 30) and it worked well.
|
|
617 posts
|
Post by loureviews on Nov 22, 2016 18:45:13 GMT
I didn't have a problem with Celia's age until that line about not having children came up. It's entirely possible that a King of advanced years could have a child of 50 plus.
|
|
2,859 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by couldileaveyou on Nov 22, 2016 20:08:49 GMT
|
|
1,013 posts
|
Post by talkstageytome on Nov 22, 2016 20:39:10 GMT
I'm so glad. Despite the mixed reviews on here I was hoping to see this, but didn't fancy two Lears in such rapid succession (Only saw the RSC one a few weeks ago). Will definitely have to listen to this...
|
|
|
|
Post by crabtree on Nov 22, 2016 22:35:35 GMT
400 years since it was performed for James in 1606. Maths was never my strong subject but........
|
|
|
|
Post by d'James on Nov 22, 2016 22:41:52 GMT
400 years since it was performed for James in 1606. Maths was never my strong subject but........ Haha. Glad it's not just me :-) |
|
617 posts
|
Post by loureviews on Nov 23, 2016 7:18:55 GMT
I'm so glad. Despite the mixed reviews on here I was hoping to see this, but didn't fancy two Lears in such rapid succession (Only saw the RSC one a few weeks ago). Will definitely have to listen to this... You'll miss something of her great performance by not seeing it but yes this is good news. |
|
1,119 posts
|
Post by martin1965 on Nov 24, 2016 11:34:33 GMT
Saw the mat yesterday and have had a sleep to reflect. It just wasnt that good im afraid! Celia Imrie was miscast and some of the other roles undercast, Kent and Edmund for example. The whole thing moves at a dnails pace and the huge expanse of the stage is completely wasted. Clearly a lot of love for Glenda esoecially at curtain, which is a bit curious as she hasnt appeared on a London stage for about 30 years.
A disappointment.
|
|
1,239 posts
|
Post by nash16 on Nov 25, 2016 0:30:17 GMT
Saw the mat yesterday and have had a sleep to reflect. It just wasnt that good im afraid! Celia Imrie was miscast and some of the other roles undercast, Kent and Edmund for example. The whole thing moves at a dnails pace and the huge expanse of the stage is completely wasted. Clearly a lot of love for Glenda esoecially at curtain, which is a bit curious as she hasnt appeared on a London stage for about 30 years. A disappointment. Great to hear someone who agrees with me on this. So disappointing. It could have been great. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2016 21:02:03 GMT
Truly spectacular
One of the most lucid and revelatory King Lears I have ever seen
The cast are first rate
And it is probably the best company in a Shakespeare play since Richard III at this very same venue
Just shows why it pays to ignore the board sometimes
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2016 21:05:09 GMT
Plenty of scum in the audience
Eating sweets
Rustling food
And making noise
Bet they don't even understand it
They should be redirected to Half A Sixpence instead
|
|
I thought she and Jane Horrocks were *fabulous* 
