367 posts
|
Post by raider80 on Apr 12, 2019 19:10:05 GMT
I caught the Oklahoma! revival on Broadway last night and this is a MUST SEE! The show is so dark , sexy, and amazingly different. Seriously, if you are going to NYC this summer you must see this show! I've posted more of my thoughts on the international board.
|
|
805 posts
|
Post by duncan on Oct 15, 2019 12:47:08 GMT
Love Song to Lavender Menace - Lyceum
The Lavender Menace bookshop is closing down, its 1987 and after 5 years of being the first LGBT bookshop in the Capital its time for two members of staff to pack away the books and reminisce about the times they've had in and around the shop.
I'm not sure on this one, I didn't find it particularly funny or really have anything new and interesting to say. It goes for Section 28 with all guns blazing but the other big issue of 1987 is glossed over with a couple of throwaway lines.
At least it had the young uns for who this is ancient history talking as we all left the theatre but this needed something else for me - if you are going to look back at LGBT life in the 80s then you need to attack all of the issues of the time.
6/10
The Stornoway Way - Festival Studio
Roman Stornoway is a singer, songwriter and hopeless drunk who lives in Stornoway. His friend Eilidh hopes to get him to record songs in a studio in Edinburgh but Roman is on a path of self destruction
Utterly hopeless.
The first show I've seen since 2008 that gets a 1 from me. Just so wrong on every single level. If I hadn't been sat right in the middle of full Row G I'd have left during the atrocious first act. I've never left any show before and this is the first time I've ever seriously considered it. Things picked up a tad in the second act when the show concentrated on the drama involved in drinking yourself to death and how it destroys your relationships but by then the damage had been long done.
I'm assuming we are supposed to think of Roman as this wonderfully charismatic character who can sing and charm the birds out of the trees but who likes a drink. But as is spelt out at the end he's a horrible selfish gobsh*te who uses others for his own ends so its pretty hard to actually like or care about your central character when he doesn't have a single redeeming feature. Caking the actors face in inches of white make-up to show us how ill he is a particular "highlight" in the sledgehammer subtlety that this show continually includes.
Acted with the ability of a Primary school nativity, directed with the panache of a wet weekend in Barrow (its got the cast breaking the wall as they come on stage to introduce themselves and the characters they play!!!!!!) and written as a bizarre musical tragicomedy that has forgettable songs, no comedy and the tragedy being its doesn't end 2 hours earlier. And lets not get started on asking a member of the audience to throw in the feed lines for a joke in the second act.
Have to admit I was hoping for something that would tell the mainland about my home and the people that reside there and instead I got this irredeemable pile of garbage.
1/10
|
|
805 posts
|
Post by duncan on Oct 17, 2019 15:11:38 GMT
The Night Watch - Kings Edinburgh
Its 1947 and in post war London we meet several characters - a wandering lost soul, a young man helping an arthritis ridden elder gentlemen, a newspaper reporter and two women running a dating agency. What has led them to their current place in the world?
I read and enjoyed the book of this several years ago and pleasingly this matches the backwards narrative of the novel. We start in 1947 with 2 characters visiting the house where a third character rents a room and from there we move backwards to 1944 to visit some of our characters enjoying the freedom that war work gave to females whilst others are in prison and then finally its 1941 and we see the very first meeting between two characters who will split up in 1944 and which will lead to complications in their life in 1947.
The first 5 minutes or so are bizarre as the cast stand on stage handing out chairs to each other, my expectations dropped considerably during this section as I sat there thinking that we were about to get an abstract take on the source material but thankfully after this things picked up considerably.
What we've got here is a 110 minute play that takes the main themes from the book and successfully, for the most part, transfers them to the stage. Its a very basic set with a backdrop of St Pauls etc having a part staged house sat in front with the sides of the stages being some rubble heaps that increase in size as we move back to the blitz.
My main concern is that it actually took me to the interval to realise that Kay and Julia were actually being played by different actresses - I honestly couldn't tell them apart and it wasn't until they were on stage together (although not together) that I realised they were different actors. I think I was thrown by another actor playing two roles in the introductory sequences with nowt more than a change of jacket so figured that they were having the love rivals for Helen played by the one actress in a sort of "look at us, isn't this a clever rouse" but alas no it was just two very similar performances from two very similar looking actors.
Kay is our weak link in the cast, I've no idea where the accent this is played in has come from but by jiminy I hope its not her real voice. Its odd. That's the only way I can describe it, well maybe a sort of female impersonation of Cary Grant crossed with Hugh Grant and for me it just didn't work. There is a decent performance in here but its lost in the voice.
The rest of the cast were good value, we have characters who are like onions with their story being revealed layer by layer as the one with the happiest ending in 1947 is in the worst place in 1941 and the character of Helen (the love interest of both Kay and Julia) who easily wins hearts with her stunning good looks but who as we discover isn't the sort of person you want to be in a relationship with. And for me the cast brought them to live in a perfectly fine fashion.
The direction is nice enough once we get beyond the chair acting, although the end of Act 1 threw a bit too much dry ice out into the audience for my liking. I'm not sure about the sound design as I was struggling to pick up the noises that were going on behind the voices of the actors - not helped by a couple of talkers a row or so in front who got shushed several times but kept talking anyway.
A very pleasant evening and a very solid 7/10. Don't expect the intricacies of the book, its very chaste, but as a starting point this is splendid enough effort.
|
|
3,059 posts
|
Post by Dr Tom on Nov 1, 2019 9:27:56 GMT
Guys And Dolls - Mountview
One of the classics, although it may not be that well known, as I overheard a Mountview student sitting next to me asking his friend if there were "any famous songs in this one"?
The new Mountview Theatre is a nice space. The seating is unallocated, but I managed to sit front row, cramped slightly by having an orchestra in front. Excellent view, but this theatre has been designed for good views all around.
I saw Cast 2, for what I think was the last show of this 3rd year student production. Thankfully no tomfoolery for a change, unlike the last two Mountview productions I've attended. This was performed and sung well, although it is a show that suits an older and more experienced cast. I think the highlight was Abii Strudwicke as Miss Adelaide.
The production values were high, some flashy dances, lots of energy and yes, some famous songs! A great night!
|
|
4,458 posts
|
Post by poster J on Nov 1, 2019 9:30:46 GMT
I overheard a Mountview student sitting next to me asking his friend if there were "any famous songs in this one"? That is surely grounds for being kicked out of theatre school!
|
|
3,059 posts
|
Post by Dr Tom on Nov 14, 2019 8:34:41 GMT
The Stunners' Opera - Mountview
One of the first performances of this new one act musical. It is sung through by an all female cast, apart from a brief spoken appearance by a single man at the start.
This is performed in an innovative way in the Backstage Theatre. Very visually impressive for a student production. The downside is the seating is some of the most uncomfortable I've ever sat on. Essentially step format, with very low steps, where you can't lean back or move your legs forward because other people are sat there. Thankfully, only a 72 minute run time (plus about 20 minutes waiting around).
This is a tale with a feminist edge, asking who the women were immortalised forever in paintings. The team behind it are impressive, Joanne Harris and Howard Goodall, and I'm sure this is intended for professional productions. There isn't an elaborate plot and I probably missed some intricacies, but it's performed well, has showcase songs for all of the talented ladies involved and there's a lot of potential there.
There was rather a lot of water splashed around the floor performance area last night, so it's lucky no one slipped or was injured. Something to watch out for.
Very few tickets left for this one (some for Saturday evening at present), but if you like to say you've been at the original production of a new musical, this is one to try for.
|
|
3,059 posts
|
Post by Dr Tom on Nov 22, 2019 9:51:24 GMT
Saturday Night Fever - Italia Conti
Made my first visit to Italia Conti last night, to their premises in Clapham. It's a quick walk from Clapham North station, right next to the Landor Theatre. Not quite the luxury of the modern surroundings of some other theatre schools, but nice enough once you actually get inside (and the front of house staff have worked out how to process tickets).
The theatre is raked, although the seats seemed to extent a long way back. It is shared seating (no arm rests), sit anywhere apart from the front row, which seemed to be reserved for latecomers. The view from centre second row was excellent. This was full, so I'd recommend getting there half an hour before to get a good seat. Unusually for a theatre school, they had glossy programmes for sale at £4 each. I didn't buy one, as they had a cast board with photos.
Saturday Night Fever was billed as new production. It is much closer to the original version than the one that's currently touring (no Bee Gees). I don't know the musical that well, so I couldn't spot many changes. Tony's boss was a woman. They were also heavily teasing Tony being gay in the first half (lots of staring past the women who were interested in him to look at the men etc), but Tony went for the girl in the end.
The staging for this was simple, largely just four large boards, mirrored on one side, turned around at various times. Performances from the third year students were mixed. Some people with great potential, with Brease Woolley as Annette standing out to me. I think Paul French as Tony had the role almost by default, being much taller than the typical male theatre ensemble member, nicely built (briefly taking his shirt off) and having the handsome tanned look. He danced very well and did a good job and I wouldn't be surprised to see him in West End roles in the future.
The main area to improve is the sound really wasn't right. Mics that weren't turned on at the right time and various harmonies that just didn't gel. One accent that went from reasonable New York when speaking to Irish when singing. On top of that, various people in the audience were talking to one another, which is unusual as theatre school shows are normally completely respectful.
Two more shows today if anyone wants to attend. There are still tickets available for 2pm.
They are also presenting Little Women next week. I don't think I can make it unfortunately, but I know it's a favourite musical of many.
|
|
3,059 posts
|
Post by Dr Tom on Dec 6, 2019 9:37:07 GMT
The Sandman - A Christmas Fairy Tale - Mountview
I believe this is another new musical that has debuted at Mountview. I got to see the first performance from Cast 2, at Mountview's homebase in Peckham, performed by their actor-musician students.
This is a musical for all the family bringing together so many plot points from children's books and shows that it almost becomes a parody. It tells the tale of a group of orphans in the period after World War 2. These poor children don't get to celebrate Christmas and there's a wicked Matron to contend with. But they can escape in their dreams - if only they can keep the nightmares away.
It is all rather cheesy and overacted by the students playing 10 year old children, but that's to be expected with this style of family show (there were a few young children in the audience, but mostly adults and other Mountview students, who found some parts hilarious). There is gold glitter that gets everywhere. There is a gunshot warning which was more annoying than helpful (it got me worked up for what turned out to just be very quiet recorded gunshots during a dream cowboy sequences and no visible guns).
For an actor-musician performance, this one is subtlety done, with the musicians generally based largely out of sight on the upper level (with rotating people playing different instruments), only occasionally needing to bring them on stage with them. Most of the cast played multiple instruments, a good choice now that actor-musician musicals are so much in vogue. The standout to me was Abigail Rogers and her dastardly Matron.
For some reason, I though this was only one act, but it was in two acts (running time 2 hours and 20 minutes, including the interval). Perhaps this changed during development as the interval was in an odd place? This has an early 7pm start for evening performances.
There are still tickets left for many of the performances over the next few days if this is your thing. It's an enjoyable enough evening out with a talented cast.
|
|
3,059 posts
|
Post by Dr Tom on Dec 10, 2019 11:36:19 GMT
An Evening of Eric & Ern at Christmas - Fairfield Halls Croydon
A festive version of the touring show, which is in Croydon for one week.
Basically, it's a series of Morecombe and Wise sketches and songs performed by the two actors who presented the play Eric and Little Ern, which I saw a few years ago. The sketches and punchlines are all well known, but that doesn't stop them being funny (and many of them were also in the play).
They do ad-lib a bit. There was a joke about them staying in the Premier Inn in Croydon this week and a woman in the audience in absolute hysterics for at least 10 minutes which kept setting everyone else off.
It isn't really a Christmas version. I don't know the normal version of the show, but the only Christmas changes are a Christmas tree on stage, one brief mention of Christmas towards the end and the musical guest Becky Neale sang All I Want For Christmas Is You as her real song (and Send In The Clowns as her funny song). She has a pleasant voice.
Not too many people there last night, unfortunately, but that's always the case in Croydon. The non-seasonal version of the show is being performed elsewhere, including some dates in the Duke of York Theatre in February with Ruthie Henshall.
If you like old cheesy jokes and don't mind being picked on if you sit at the front, this is a lot of fun.
Running time is just over two hours, including an interval.
|
|
734 posts
|
Post by dippy on Jan 26, 2020 16:13:26 GMT
I'm surprised nobody seems to have mentioned watching "Singin' in the Rain" at The Mill at Sonning. I saw this recently and absolutely adored it. Singin' in the Rain was one of the first film musicals I ever saw and I've loved it since. Having seen that Philip Bertioli was playing Don was enough to entice me to go and see this version of it. For such a small theatre they have done an amazing job and make it work really well. I did think that some of the film sections went on for a bit too long but if that's my main complaint then that's not exactly bad! I thought Philip was perfect as Don and it was nice seeing him play the main character in a production. Brendan Cull and Rebecca Jayne-Davies were also both good in their roles as Cosmo and Kathy. I did enjoy Sammy Kelly's Lina but her voice didn't seem quite annoying enough, however I definitely wouldn't want to ruin my voice squeaking away so if she's doing something that means she's not harming her voice then that's fine! Even though I love the film I didn't miss it and was totally drawn into this version, the dancing was well suited to the small stage. Singin' in the Rain was of course wonderful with just the right amount of splashing around. Interestingly they slightly changed the story in the "Broadway Melody" section to actually give it a bit more story which I actually appreciated. Also the musical starts and ends in the modern day and I thought that was very cleverly done and I liked it even though when it started I wasn't sure I would.
It was my first visit to the theatre, can't see myself returning there any time soon unless there's a show or person I really want to see, as it's really on the expensive side but I decided to treat myself. It's good they have had a few Thursday matinees which don't include a meal meaning it's £20 cheaper.
|
|
3,059 posts
|
Post by Dr Tom on Jan 27, 2020 9:50:17 GMT
I'm surprised nobody seems to have mentioned watching "Singin' in the Rain" at The Mill at Sonning. Thanks for the review. I have already booked for this too, but unfortunately can only do an evening, so it is a rather pricey show when the train/taxi/hotel costs etc are taken into account. Also always a bit put off when you can't choose a seat. But glad to hear it's worth the money - and yes, the casting was the main reason I decided to attend.
|
|
734 posts
|
Post by dippy on Jan 27, 2020 10:47:13 GMT
Thanks for the review. I have already booked for this too, but unfortunately can only do an evening, so it is a rather pricey show when the train/taxi/hotel costs etc are taken into account. Also always a bit put off when you can't choose a seat. But glad to hear it's worth the money - and yes, the casting was the main reason I decided to attend. Glad to hear someone else is going, hope you enjoy it as much as I did. Shame you couldn't do a cheaper matinee and get home again on the same day. With regards to not being able to choose your seat you can if you phone them up, however that was a hassle as I didn't care which show I saw, I just wanted a good seat. Also they are still in the past when it comes to seating plans, they are all on paper and nothing digital, so they can't just click through the shows and have a quick look they have to put the phone aside and go and look at the shows you're interested in seeing then report back as to what seats there are. However the theatre is tiny so wherever you are you'll be pretty close, fingers crossed you're not too far round to the side as even though it was made for that space they really seemed to play almost everything towards the centre.
|
|
805 posts
|
Post by duncan on Jan 30, 2020 23:10:07 GMT
Well, here we go again...…
2020.01 Ragnarock - MAC, Stirling
A golden age is ending. There have been three years of winter. The sun hangs low in the sky, unmoving, there is little food and society is finished. The serpent spits poison all over the world, Fenrir attempts to shatter his chains and not even Odin can save the world... A young girl and her brother battle to seek a future in a promised land, moving through a fractured world as dreams and reality clash around them.
I don’t know, I really just don’t know. This was totally not what I was expecting - based on the blurb I was thinking it was going to be the story of two children attempting to survive the end of the world. But instead it was a video/aural/puppetry telling of the story.
4 performers building a set, lego style with shoebox sized houses, paper Mache mountains, paper trees etc then placing little plasticine figures in the set and filming it on a Go-Pro (projected onto a screen) whilst a voiceover and appropriate musical accompaniment told us what was going on. So our performers don't really get much to do despite being on stage for the whole show, there is a lot of moving small models about and pointing small cameras at them but that's almost it, we get a monologue from Odin about fate (see below) and Fenrir attempting to trick them into shattering his chains but aside from that its mainly a voiceover from children.
Bizarre, odd and at a brisk 65 minutes it didn't outstay its welcome BUT for me because I'm being asked to care for someone made out of Playdoh I just didn't connect with the story. I enjoyed all of the Norse mythology bits (various hats being used to represent the likes of Fenrir) but didn't actually care for the central thrust of the story. Also an odd decision about half way through to have Odin tell us who is going to die.
A the great ash tree trembles to its roots 6/10 and an odd start to the year.
|
|
805 posts
|
Post by duncan on Feb 1, 2020 23:06:55 GMT
2020.02 Heroine - Traverse 2
Danna Davis joins the US Army and becomes the only female in her platoon. It takes courage to lead a squad under attack in Iraq but its even harder when one member of that squad is one of the three soldiers in the platoon that raped her. Can you heal and forgive under fire? And what happens when you return to the real world as a civilian? How do you even begin to cope with Military Sexual Trauma?
Based on the true story of Danna Davis, this is an 80 minute one actor show.
And its tough going, as you would expect when the main themes are rape, PTSD, suicide attempts, loss and war. As its real life its not all wrapped up in a happy bow at the end, I mean how on earth do you even begin to come through the other side of what Danna had to go through?
Its a sparse stage with five stools on stage being the only "set" so with only one actor it may look sparse but there is some nice sound design here that builds the trauma and also helps to Pr**k the tension when required to try and level this out from being too depressive to give us some lighter moments. The arrival of the theme from the Titanic film brings about a big laugh.
Mary Jane Wells has written and stars in the production and whilst she can do a convincing American accent there were, sadly, several times when she stumbled over the lines. This didn't detract from the show as much as the complete idiot in the front row who thought that a show where someone is raped would be a good place to sit and eat a bag of Beef Hula Hoops rather noisily for the first 15 minutes or so.
Fascinating, chilling, inspiring and horrifying - a 7/10.
|
|
805 posts
|
Post by duncan on Feb 4, 2020 15:31:38 GMT
2020.03 Ten Times Table - Kings Edinburgh
Meetings bloody meetings! A group of residents in a small market town, form a committee to, look at boosting the towns standing by holding a fete complete with re-enactment of the deaths of 12 workers at the hands of the establishment 200 years previously. As we count down to the day the committee splits along worker/establishment lines and dangerous feelings come to the surface.
Welcome my friends to the "Classic Comedy Theatre Company", yes its Uncle Bill and his regulars but this time they have moved on from Christie, Drama and Film adaptations and moved to Comedy.
Which is nice.
But this just wasn't funny. I feel that I could write the exact same thing for every Ayckbourn I've seen - horrible people do horrible things to each other in a gently amusing way and then the quiet character will bring the house down with a pointed barb at one or two points.
I think I have to admit that the Ayckbourn house style just isn't for me - yes its a pleasant enough evening but it lacks bite in relation to its social commentary and the vast majority of what jokes there are do appear to be dependent on delivery and thus Robert Daws gives us his all in the most consistently entertaining performance and wrings chuckles out of moments that really don't deserve them whilst Craig Gazey goes OTT a couple of times and overplays his minutes centrestage to an extent that we loose the amusement.
The rest of the cast include those Uncle Bill regulars Robert Duncan, Deborah Grant and Mark Curry plus the aforementioned Gazey, one time EastEnders Mrs Hewitt Elizabeth Power and Emmerdale refuge Gemma Oaten.
BUT its Harry Gostelow as Tim, the former soldier who wants to give the proles a taste of some cold hard steel, who comes on and steals the show right out from under Daws, in a 10 minute cameo at the end. Which led me to wonder what on earth Duncan was doing in this show, its a terrible part of a man being drunk (repeatedly) and not saying anything of note. I cant believe they hired one of the most well known faces simply to fall off a toy horse. Its a crying shame Gostelow isn't giving this performance from the start.
And the production also lets the play down, it wasn't until someone mentioned the death of Noel Coward in Act 2 that I realised I was watching something set in the 70s. It could be any fading hotel at any time, the set and costumes didn't scream 1970s BUT Grant playing Helen Dixon is styled as what can only be described as Mrs Thatcher garb and hair (complete with handbag) and Gazey as Marxist teacher Eric has clearly been modelled on Jeremy Corbyn.
Overall it passed the time but it just didn't deliver for me.
4/10 - a fete almost worse than death!
|
|
1,335 posts
|
Post by Dave B on Feb 8, 2020 10:14:59 GMT
On McQuillan's Hill - Finborough Theatre
Blackly funny comedy set around the release of an IRA man around 1999 under the good Friday agreement. A great cast showing a group of people damaged by themselves, by each other and by the circumstances of the time. A slower first half that really kicks into gear after the interval. Good use of the Finborough's small space, well directed and we enjoyed it a lot. Runs till the end of the month I think. Totally sold out on the first night.
|
|
805 posts
|
Post by duncan on Feb 14, 2020 23:14:31 GMT
2020.04 - Mouthpiece - Traverse 1
A woman takes a step forward into the air. A teenage boy pulls her back. Two lives are changed. Libby whiles away her days in New Town and still calls herself a writer. Declan is a talented young artist struggling with a volatile home on the city's outskirts. As they form an uneasy friendship, complicated by class and culture, Libby spots an opportunity to put herself back on track, and really make a difference. She needs his story. But does she have a right to it?
A 95 minute one act look at a writer with severe block who finds her muse in a 16 year old NEET who stops her from committing suicide one night. Over the course of the play we find a writer using someone for her own ends as she goes on a Poverty Safari in terms of finding the language and situations that fire her imagination and will get her published again.
Its a look at the middle classes using other peoples misery for their own ends.
A sparse set represents the hills overlooking Edinburgh, a café, a bedroom and the Traverse Theatre whilst our cast of 2 give it their all - in a script which includes more uses of the C word than you'll hear down Govan Cross on a Saturday night at chucking out time- with one time Spooks actor Shauna Macdonald portraying the blocked writer and current student Angus Taylor is great as the NEET who sees a new world open up in front of him but who ultimately cant escape his place in the circle of life.
Its entertaining, its obvious, its well acted but even at 95 minutes it overstays its welcome by a good 10 minutes - the last half hour or so does see us seemingly going round in circles again and again and again once the relationship falters.
A Shut it you See U Next Tuesday - 7/10
|
|
805 posts
|
Post by duncan on Feb 20, 2020 21:07:17 GMT
2020.06 - I Think We Are Alone - Kings EdinbughThe lives of six everyday people intertwine in small ways - a cab driver picks up an HR worker whose boyfriend has left her, her sister works in a hospice that is treating the cab drivers wife for cancer. Meanwhile the cabbie drops off a customer at the garage that Josie works at, who is smothering her son by placing her academic dreams of Cambridge on his shoulders. Over time these lives connect - some in big ways, some in small ways that they'll never notice but all will be about people not wanting to be alone. Frantic Assembly and Curve present a new play by Sally Abbott. And its the best thing I've seen this year and yet I couldn't help but come away with a sense that it could have been better. The first act flew by as we were introduced to the characters and their own particular quirks but the second act whilst attempting to build on this occasionally misses the mark and some of the character interactions become just a tad strained. The Nurse and the son going back to her place for a one night stand just seems off, especially as this is where the big reveal of why the sisters don't talk is given to us. And that final resolution of the sisters finally reconnecting is just too trite - its the happy ending, or at least one of the endings, that we don't really need. We come off the road of reality that we've been going down for 80 minutes or so and into the fairytale world of "and with one conversation all was soon to be well again" Which is a shame as at one point the realisation that what we are seeing is not linear for all of the characters is a great moment and knocks the feet out from under you. At one point we've been told a very specific plot point by Graham the cabbie and its only in the second act that we work out why he said what he did. We go from wondering if he's lonely because the wife and children he tells his customers about are actually real to the realisation that the character we've seen dying in the hospice is his wife and the reason she left him a couple of months ago is because she's actually dead. And that leads us to the Suffocating mother and her academically gifted son - a plot line that essentially glues the production together but which is one of those plots that you know from the first off how it will play out. He can't bring himself to tell her he doesn't want to be a Cambridge Uni graduate and she cant understand why he's being so odd. Its one of those plots that would be resolved if they actually spoke to one another right at the off instead of waiting until 10 minutes before the end as if they were characters in a drama rather than real people. Its a simple staging with four or so almost see through panels moved around the stage by the cast to represent various locations - two panels are the mothers front room, four panels are the hospice walls, various panels are part of a nightclub and several times they just represent the world coming together and effectively crushing our characters into isolation. Isolation is a big part of the play, or more not wanting to be isolated - wanting there to be someone in your life, be it the taped voice of your dead father or demanding that your partner goes indoor skydiving even though you know he's not the one. There is some very effective lighting to also highlight where we are. Several moans there but I did really enjoy it, sadly though if it hadn't been for the five school groups in attendance there would have been sod all people there. 6 people in our entire block of seats. An almost an 8 but just slightly let down by the ending 7/10
|
|
805 posts
|
Post by duncan on Feb 26, 2020 23:30:44 GMT
2020.07 - Oor Wullie - MacRobert
Wahid feels out of place at school, the mysterious librarian Dudley gives him an Oor Wullie book to read. Wahid soon finds Wullie and his pals are in town and looking for his bucket. Basher is also looking for the bucket as she is fed up of the stories being about Wullie instead of her.
Poor writing, poor direction, poor staging, poor me for sitting through this mince.
As subtle as a brick, the message isn't so much hammered home as launched with a full tactical nuclear assault - being an outsider is hard but you can still make friends.
Wahid and Basher being the same character in search of the same plot resolution. The difference being one is ostracised because of his race and the other because of her behaviour, and its just off in terms of what it does to the plot. They have almost the exact same character arc throughout but one is from the good side of things whilst the other is from the Basher side of things. It lop sides the plot into too many parts being almost carbon copies of what we've already seen. It just needs something different injected to push the plot along, as my goodness the second half drags - the child a couple of seats along from me audibly asked if it almost finished a good half hour or so before it finally crashed to a juddering stop.
Dull. Poor. Jings Crivvins and Help ma Boab it stank. 1 point for the Dudley reference, which I don’t think anyone else got this evening and 1 point for Jeemy.
|
|
1,335 posts
|
Post by Dave B on Sept 17, 2021 8:22:25 GMT
Two quick ones.
Lately - Lion & Unicorn.
Lately has just been extended and added some touring dates. We saw it earlier in the week and did enjoy it. It does deal with a lot of cliches without falling into too many of them. Two alternating casts and the young actors we saw, Matt Wake , Lauren Ferdinand were both very good and brought a lot to the script.
NW Trilogy - Kiln.
Taking the same approach as Out West in the Lyric and telling three stories rooted in the local area. Larger casts, shared between each story and adding music along the way. Really enjoyed this, there's a lot of warmth in the stories and it shines through on the stage.
|
|
|
Post by londonpostie on Sept 22, 2021 19:40:26 GMT
NW Trilogy - Kiln.Taking the same approach as Out West in the Lyric and telling three stories rooted in the local area. Larger casts, shared between each story and adding music along the way. Really enjoyed this, there's a lot of warmth in the stories and it shines through on the stage.
Yep, pretty much the definition of community theatre; 2 tales of immigration from the history of this area of town, and something by Roy Williams.
With 3 works there's little time for complexity but I certainty felt emotionally invested in the first story (Moira Buffini’s Dance Floor), and I felt drawn in by the socio-political-economic dimensions of the third (Suhayla El-Bushra’s Waking/Walking).
I know Irish and south Asian families just like these, and shared the times they have lived through. The locals I chatted with loved it and I could see why.
|
|
1,335 posts
|
Post by Dave B on Sept 26, 2021 21:51:37 GMT
Red Light Winter - Turbine Theatre. First visit to this theatre and I would note that the staff were particularly friendly, front of house, bar and even the crew. So good work there. The play.... yikes. Let me start by saying that my partner and I both did not hate watching it, it was engaging and it was not utterly dreadful to watch ..... but, oh wow talking about it afterwards. I really don't want to just dump all over it as I'll say again, it was far from an awful evening but sheesh. I'm gonna cover the whole thing so I will spoiler up just in case. {Spoiler}{Spoiler - click to view}Okay, so there is a lot of pretentious crap in the dialogue, the two American characters go on at each other about authors and it just does nothing other than disconnect us from the characters. It seems to serve no purpose, an editor could have done good work there and if anything added to rather than detracted from the play.
Early on there is full male nudity, the play is advertised with a bit of an edge and it's got a bit of a tease - but the nudity is brief and almost purely as a character changes clothes. And then that is it. I do realise this sounds like I'm complaining but having read a bit on the way home about the original presentation of the play, there was a lot more nudity and the point where the lights go off to end the first half in this production goes quite a bit further in the original - which then makes some later dialogue make more sense. I wonder if it was cut? So it left us thinking that this single early scene of nudity was left/placed in just to allow advertising. The perhaps (and I stress the word perhaps) the more story driven (story justified?) nudity is gone but the advertising certainly implies it is not.
So we are suppose to believe there is essentially a love triangle going on but it’s just not there on stage. It *might* be there in the dialogue and the premise, I will grant that, but it was not there on stage. There’s cliched stereotypes and perhaps with a strong cast and some chemistry this might have been more convincing but I struggle to see how it cover-comes the sheer misogyny that is inherent to the story.
On the cast, I will note first that we saw the third performance.
James Burman was really good in places, there were moments where he was way better than the production and so I'll give him credit for that.
I honestly cannot tell you if Freddy Sawyer was any good. The role is thankless and he is quite OTT in places but that could have been what he was asked to do. I'd think he probably deserves a look in something else before passing further comment. Tian Chaudhry is given a tough job and I'm sorry to say we thought really struggled throughout.
Finally 'Scenes of Adult Nature' in the performance information is doing a lot of heaving lifting, sure drug usage and sex but also suicide and sexual assault. I think this could have been expanded a bit more.
On a lighter note the most entertaining thing about the evening was the overheard conversation at the interval where a woman's daughter was emphatically not prepared to explain what 'she tea bagged my nuts' meant.
|
|
1,335 posts
|
Post by Dave B on Oct 10, 2021 11:46:40 GMT
The Cherry Orchard - Windsor Royal.
When the Windsor Royal announced Ian McKellen in Hamlet and then the Cherry Orchard, we decided to do both but had agreed on one of the more expensive seats and then one of the cheaper seats. So while were nicely at the front of the stalls for Hamlet, we were in the back row of the circle for this at yesterday's matinee. Or at least we should have been but there were at least 1/3 of the seats empty (and this has been on seat filling all week), so we moved forward a good bit which was nice.
It was... not great. My partner had a bit of better opinion of it than I did but it mostly felt dull. There were bits were dialogue had been updated 'innit' and none of it seemed to flow. The company ... they almost came across as disinterested to be honest. Actors who had been quite strong in Hamlet didn't seem to be making a go of this at all and all of it seemed over the top, Pischik is just a drunken buffoon and seems directed to imagine he was in a panto at times.
I think it has opened, but I can't seem to find any reviews or anything so I don't know if it is getting any traction. I struggle to see how it might complete it's run if widely seatfilled less than a week into it and it's still not filling up.
A shame, but we enjoyed our day trip to Windsor.
|
|
1,335 posts
|
Post by Dave B on Oct 11, 2021 10:02:51 GMT
Just for the sake of fairness, I wanted to note that I found out this morning I was mistaken in my last post in this thread. The Cherry Orchard has not opened yet, press night was pushed back and is this week (13th) so this was still a preview that we saw.
It's too late to edit my post but there we are.
|
|
1,335 posts
|
Post by Dave B on Oct 25, 2021 9:16:27 GMT
Maryland - Royal Court
A script in hand new play by Lucy Kirkwood written in reaction to the murders of Sabina Nessa and Sarah Everard. A 25 minute drama with simple chalk lines showing a street and a police station and a chorus of Furies sat along side. The Furies speak both separately and in tandem as they poll the audience about ways women think and act in order to feel safe. There is a lot of humour in this in places but it's black, black humour and it is mostly filled with rage - a well deserved rage and builds this asking throughout why we, all of us, are not more angry.
Great performances, I saw it with cast 6, there was a pretty strong reaction throughout the audience.
The play has been made available for performance for the next few weeks, so if you see this on locally - do consider a visit.
Chrysalis - Jermyn Street Theatre
A one night only presentation of two new plays, both around an hour, at JST.
First up Butterflies of Life written by and starring Chirag Benedict Lobo & Daniel Adeosun. They are students at an elite drama school and have a strong, easily visible, friendship based in no small part on a shared experience of being in the minority and the many, many comments that have been made by their classmates and their teachers. Hugely funny throughout and the two guys work so well together. Builds to an ending with a howl. Hugely eager to see what both do next in both writing and acting. Looking 'em up after, I see that Daniel Adeosun is in Trouble in Mind opening in the NT next month so an extra reason to look forward to that.
Then SCRATCHES by and starring Aoife Kennan. She is part of Plain Heroines who did the excellent The Fourth Country at the Vault Festival (and playing in the Park Theatre for a month from early January). This is a one-woman show... or at least that is how it starts out. It's a mixture of a stand-up, a two-hander, a straight up talk with more than a sprinkling of meta commentary and it is gripping. The story of Girl who has been self-harming and it tells her story, heartbreak and pain and friendship and it is bitingly funny, touching and sad.
Frankly, that was a ridiculous night at JST. Either play was more than worth the £10 price of admission and both had superb writing and acting.
|
|
|
Post by cavocado on Oct 25, 2021 9:34:25 GMT
|
|
1,335 posts
|
Post by Dave B on Nov 8, 2021 11:56:34 GMT
Quick thoughts.
Tender Napalm - King’s Head
Funny, explicit (in language) and full of energy. A two hander where the monologues are extensive and can include substantial movement. We both enjoyed this a lot and the title is excellent and really *really* works within the context of the play, an excellent description too.
The Girl Who Was Very Good At Lying - Omnibus.
One actor show where Rachael Rooney does an excellent job of bringing us into her world and the other characters around her. The small, funny, lies as she plays tour guide to a visiting American bring other things to the front as their travels go on. Simple set, a spider-web of lies and a smart script to complement the excellent performance.
Old Bridge - Bush Theatre.
The young cast are all excellent and bring a nice extra level to a story which has a lot of potential but doesn’t quite work. The main emotional impact being built around the physical bridge rather than the characters - so that didn’t land so well (no pun intended). Some really nice bits of dialogue and for a play written pre-Covid, some very pertinent thoughts on living with a change in the world really jumped out. Don’t get me wrong, we enjoyed this and it’s well worth a look, it just feels like it had the potential to be a little more.
All of these were booked and in our diary for a while but I have seen offers for each of these recently. Well worth it.
|
|
|
Post by cavocado on Nov 8, 2021 12:32:52 GMT
Value Engineering (Tabernacle Notting Hill). Verbatim play edited from the transcripts of the Grenfell Enquiry. My first experience of a verbatim play so I don't feel I really know how to review it except to say I found it compelling and shocking and would recommend it. The Tabernacle was interesting to visit too. Also at Birmingham Rep later in the month.
The Sugar House (Finborough). Set in Sydney with some interesting themes about gentrification, institutional corruption, and the precariousness of working class communities. Committed performances too, but the writing sometimes felt a bit cliched and lacking in emotional nuance.
|
|
1,335 posts
|
Post by Dave B on Nov 8, 2021 16:20:11 GMT
Just got an email from Stratford East - they are putting it on twice later this month.
|
|
3,471 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Nov 28, 2021 5:32:49 GMT
Blue/Orange - Joe Penhall - Touring
Sorry, I've no idea how to type in bold on here and can't see any options to do so but I caught this at one of the tour venues and it was fantastic. I hadn't seen it since the original NT production in 2000 and couldn't remember much about that. As the Guardian reviewer pointed out, the fact that two of the three characters are played by black actors instead of one only as in the NT production really changes the dynamic. Shame it was so poorly-attended when I saw it but it received a pretty unanimous standing ovation and I'm still thinking about it now.
This is a co-production between the Theatre Royal Bath, Royal & Derngate Northampton and Oxford Playhouse.
|
|