5,058 posts
|
Post by Phantom of London on Dec 13, 2016 13:13:59 GMT
I thought it was a ministry of transport requirement to have a person on board a train at all times.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Dec 13, 2016 14:05:50 GMT
I thought it was a ministry of transport requirement to have a person on board a train at all times. It is but the drivers are particularly prone to industrial inaction - the DLR is driverless and seems to keep going a lot better. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 13, 2016 14:08:07 GMT
There's always a staff member on the DLR though. Driverless does not necessarily mean completely free of all employees.
|
|
7,183 posts
|
Post by Jon on Dec 13, 2016 14:22:41 GMT
The Victoria Line trains are driverless but they have someone who opens and closes the doors and is there in case of an emergency
|
|
|
|
Post by profquatermass on Dec 13, 2016 15:15:01 GMT
Not having drivers didn't prevent the Victoria line from shutting down completely this morning
|
|
5,058 posts
|
Post by Phantom of London on Dec 13, 2016 19:19:13 GMT
I thought it was a ministry of transport requirement to have a person on board a train at all times. It is but the drivers are particularly prone to industrial inaction - the DLR is driverless and seems to keep going a lot better. The DLR isn't driverless. |
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on Dec 13, 2016 21:15:19 GMT
And they will be driverless which at least removes one source of service disruption. How can you tell the difference between a plumber and a chemist? Let them pronounce unionised. |
|
