330 posts
|
Post by RedRose on Mar 20, 2017 16:13:03 GMT
A play is not necessary relevant because it is set in a certain place or time.
|
|
|
Post by perfectspy on Mar 24, 2017 22:10:38 GMT
I liked this play but felt it could have been better.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2017 16:36:06 GMT
I popped along to this yesterday afternoon as I was in the area, and looking for a matinee. I nabbed right of centre row C of the stalls for a £15 travelex ticket. The view was wonderful, despite the lack of a rake, however the biggest problem I had was the lack of legroom. I barely squeezed in (at 6' 3") but luckily the seat to my right was unoccupied so I could turn myself this way - craning my neck as I watched the action on my left though. Despite that, I sucked it up and enjoyed the play.
I wasn't sure what to make of this at first, but I think I loved it. It was quirky, not like anything I'd seen recently, and made me think about judging people based on only knowing one side of a story. We were encouraged to believe that Kelvin was such a loser, but he challenged this perception and by the end I had a different opinion of him.
|
|
4,804 posts
|
Post by Mark on Mar 30, 2017 20:48:05 GMT
I saw the play tonight through a bargain rate ticket and actually quite enjoyed it. 90 mins went by rather quickly.
I thought the cast were uniformly excellent with special mention of course to Kate Fleetwood for what is clearly a very demanding performance physically.
I felt the use of VR wasn't fully realised, but the other scenes themselves were interesting and you can feel the anger that Jess holds.
Worth seeing!
|
|
105 posts
|
Post by youngoffender on Mar 31, 2017 11:17:52 GMT
Looking at availability on the NT site, this seems to be having real difficulty in selling. The theme of this one screams Dorfman to me, not Lyttleton. Could it not have fitted in there?
|
|
117 posts
|
Post by edmundokeano on Mar 31, 2017 11:54:21 GMT
Looking at availability on the NT site, this seems to be having real difficulty in selling. The theme of this one screams Dorfman to me, not Lyttleton. Could it not have fitted in there? Definitely more suited to the more intimate Dorfman. It's not a bad play at all (actually surprisingly better than I thought it would be) but it does get lost on that ridiculously large stage in the Lyttleton.
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Apr 2, 2017 9:45:08 GMT
Saw this last night from the front row of the circle. I'm still collating my thoughts - I started out being unsure and ended up almost loving it. The story has already been told above, so I'll just give my general thoughts. The first ten minutes were not good for me - the American accents were obviously fake and I'm in agreement with some on here that Olivia Darnley wasn't very good. As already pointed out, she played the part as though she'd been told to speak up after the matinee. It wasn't just the shouting, but the fact that there was no diversity to her performance whatsoever that bothered me. Every single line was presented in the same, loud manner. I also felt that Kate Fleetwood couldn't give her best when in the two-handers with her as she was given nothing to play with. From the front of the dress circle I couldn't really see Jess's disfigurement at all. Also, I was slightly stage left of centre. You need to be stage right of centre (I'd say from seat 15 onwards) due to the right cheek being the one with the burns and also the off centre position of the sofa. What I could see, however, was the brilliance of Kate Fleetwood's depiction of pain, how she held herself throughout. Each part of her body that didn't work properly was rigid whether she was sitting, standing, lying or moving about. I would imagine she'd need some serious physiotherapy after a double show! I didn't really think much of Ralph Little's Stevie. Until, that is, his two 2-handers with Jess when I completely changed my mind about him. They were outstanding and I wished there had been more. We also got to see a better side of Kate Fleetwood, which was absent during her scenes with Olivia Darnley. The silence during Jess's scene with Stevie near the end after The Big Reveal was absolutely deafening. Perfectly timed with silent emotion. Wonderful stuff. Kris Marshall was the one reason I almost didn't go and see this. I've never liked anything he's done on telly (not seen him in the theatre before) as I think he plays everything like an overgrown teenager. So they gave him the part of ........ an overgrown teenager. Ingenious casting and, for me, he was the best thing in it! Again, not enough. Not nearly enough. For me, however, the weakest aspect was the direction. It felt as though every ounce of energy had been poured into Miss Fleetwood's movement and stance to the detriment of everything else. For example. Jess is a burns victim. There is a scene where a lighter is ignited, after which I lost the next 3 minutes as my mind was furiously playing over 10 other scenarios as to how I'd have done it. There were many such moments that were just thrown away. I have to mention the virtual reality projections - pretty much lost on me, although I quite liked them - but I was with a music student who works with people who study and work in this medium and she was seriously impressed. I think this would be a great play for GCSE or A level. There are so many themes to it and also many of the scenes that end abruptly would be perfect as a basis for students to write a continuation. I also think it would be a good one for a school to put on if they were looking for something with a small cast. It's short, cheap on set and costumes and would give the techies within the school something meaty to attempt. I really enjoyed it - by the end I wanted more - and was surprised at how full the Lyttleton was. Edit: mallardo Kate Fleetwood did indeed get her own bow - not sure if that's down to you!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2017 9:49:31 GMT
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Apr 2, 2017 9:51:31 GMT
^LOL! Who the heck is Kate Flynn? Thanks @baemax - time enough to edit! That'll teach me to write reviews before the third cup of coffee.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2017 11:11:10 GMT
This is the problem when a theatre becomes centred on its "members". When they put on a show that the members don't all rush to like lemmings, the theatre has no fallback strategy to attract the wider public. This is a Travelex production - the whole purpose of which was to draw in the wider public!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2017 11:33:54 GMT
Ugly Lies the Bone is the one show that I've seen (or plan to see) at the NT this year (although I admit I've seen My Country on tour locally and have booked to see Jane Eyre locally). I was drawn to attend by the prospect of a new play from a new voice with interesting themes, the tantalising promise of innovative design technology in the Lyttelton which is open to spectacular design, several enticing cast members, and the Travelex pricing which is more affordable than the generally offputting NT prices for the good seats.
There are only four or five of these Travelex shows each year and it's an embarrassing failure if the NT can't manage to fill the theatre for all of them. There must be hordes of potential attenders who are completely unaware of reviews. And some of my listed reasons would surely also attract them.
Obviously my own comments posted in this thread when I'd seen the show were not entirely positive. (!) But it really seems like a calamitous abuse of the Travelex sponsorship to produce a show and be unable to fill it. It really isn't that bad! There must be groups who could have been reached out to who would have enjoyed their visit and wouldn't otherwise have attended.
"It's your national theatre" (if you're already a member).
|
|
403 posts
|
Post by altamont on May 11, 2017 12:25:24 GMT
^I think it was the subject matter and mediocre reviews that really did for it, HG. I mean, name me a single show - musical or play - about a physically deformed person, that has become a total box office smash hit... The Elephant Man (although Bradley Cooper might have had something to do with that)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2017 12:26:36 GMT
I assumed Monkey's winky face was his way of saying he's fully aware such shows exist, like Phantom of the Opera or Richard III...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2017 12:46:17 GMT
^ Yes, he was deflecting the conversation with irrelevant comments about "total box office smash hit". That's hardly the aim of the NT with every production. But they should have a reason for doing every show, and that reason should include a notion of for whom in particular the show is intended. And the NT should engage with that potential audience to encourage it to attend. Particularly with Travelex shows, like this and Salome, which are sponsored for the purpose of increasing general accessibility to the NT and engaging with a wider public. It's just not good enough for the NT to programme random American plays because they give an opportunity to explore design technology developments, and just hope that enough of the members' club turns out.
|
|
403 posts
|
Post by altamont on May 11, 2017 13:03:47 GMT
I assumed Monkey's winky face was his way of saying he's fully aware such shows exist, like Phantom of the Opera or Richard III... Well, I feel very foolish now....
|
|
752 posts
|
Post by Latecomer on May 21, 2017 14:07:02 GMT
Really glad I saw this! Interesting story, fun set, great acting from everyone! I was immersed in both the real world and Jess's virtual world and Fleetwood was superb. Had me rather teary. Kris Marshall quite a surprise...excellent! Interesting questions about how you want to live your life and how big you want your world to be. Those front seats are quite tiny aren't they? I think there should be a LARGE wearing when you buy them....I had spread issues from person next to me!
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on May 21, 2017 14:10:06 GMT
I had spread issues from person next to me! Ugh! But I'm giggling. I may steal that term. Glad you liked it by the way. I too thought it was great and was also very pleasantly surprised at Kris Marshall.
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on May 21, 2017 20:10:35 GMT
Tick from me. Booked on the strength of Kate Fleetwood and not disappointed, uncomfortable viewing though this was at times. Front row so great view, though yes either i'm getting bigger or those seats are shrinking or in fact my neighbour just took a dislike to me and so decided to elbow me a lot. I watched thinking i was probably enjoying more than most people as it was a very quiet audience but very positive at the end. Was put off by Kris Marshall casting but yes actually pleasantly surprised too and agree that the two handers between Fleetwood and Ralf Little really crackled at times. So a bit funny, bit thinking and bit emotional at the same time, can't complain.
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on May 31, 2017 19:05:31 GMT
Good review theatremonkey
|
|
716 posts
|
Post by theatre-turtle on Jun 5, 2017 16:40:09 GMT
Anyone know why tomorrow afternoon cancelled?
|
|
1,238 posts
|
Post by nash16 on Jun 5, 2017 16:46:54 GMT
Anyone know why tomorrow afternoon cancelled? I think because of the sales for the last performance in the evening, they are asking patrons to please attend that instead. It is nearly empty.
|
|