|
Post by PineappleForYou on Jun 10, 2024 18:43:06 GMT
Bit of a ramble but...
With behaviour seemly getting worse in theatres, are fans of specific shows getting worse as well?
In recent memory, there has been the incident at the stagedoor for Hadestown with Melanie La Barrie, the unhealthy obsession with Jordan Luke Gage in Bonnie and Clyde and the fanatical Heathers groupies.
This behaviour is the minority not the majority of fans. However, go to watch any Megamix videos from 2024 Starlight Express and the comments certainly feel like a toxic fandom. Overtly negative for the sake of wanting something that is not their nostalgia to be unsuccessful. We also have some of that on the thread here and in it's poll seemingly.
Fandom is a great thing, that's why we are all on this board. Producers dream of creating a strong fandom around their shows because, just look at Operation Mincemeat. However, there seems to be a point where fandoms become less of a driving force for good and more a group of gatekeeping party poppers. I know it's because of love for their chosen shows but no one is taking it from you.
Again, these are often just the most vocal members but this can often influence other members. This is what I think is happening with those Starlight comments as most don't actually articulate why something is bad or account for the fact it's in early previews. I also don't know how genuine some of them are. See it with your own eyes and make a judgement for yourself. This behaviour just creates more gatekeeping and a bad feeling.
Personally, I love revivals because of new takes on material and fresh ideas. Equally, shows should rejuvenate themselves because, after all, they are not a film.
Anyway, what's your thoughts? Does this type of fan annoy you as much as me? Are they getting worse? 😂
|
|
|
Post by westendboy on Jun 10, 2024 21:23:47 GMT
In my experience, it's often fans of specific big name stars appearing in plays/musicals that tend to be the most toxic, at least in terms of audience behaviour. An example I can think of off the top of my head are Sheridan Smith's fans during the run of 'Shirley Valentine' at the Duke of York's last year. This isn't Sheridan's fault at all (I've heard she's rather nice IRL), but the types of people she attracts can be rather irritable to say the least. They would take their phones out to film her onstage, even when there were signs around the theatre, specifically stating that this was prohibited. Not to mention the sense of entitlement they bring in, which lead to their abysmal treatment of the FOH staff. Although, I believe this was most likely due to a mixture of two things that are causing this ongoing issue with bad audience behaviour and toxic fandoms;
1). The fact that the types of people seeing these are those who don't go and watch theatre often, so they come in with this sort of "Netflix mindset", which has been an ongoing issue since lockdown ended and they treat a live performance like they're watching a film, or TV programme.
2). The ridculously high ticket prices brings in this sense of entitlement, which I mentioned above, often from people who are expecting a 5* service from these theatres and when they don't receive this, they take it out on those poor FOH staff members, who are paid minimum wage and don't deserve to be treated like trash by these types of people.
I'm not saying that this kind of thing is happening for all West End shows, but it's a rising trend I've been noticing and find it worrying. I, however, blame all this on the producers who sell tickets at these rates and market these shows in a way that leads to certain people coming in and behave in an unpleasant manner. Not to mention casting celebrities in plays, even if they can't even act at all. *cough* Lily Allan *cough*
I understand that in a post-Covid world, theatres need to do this to keep afloat and, as much as we may all groan, this strategy is working. Also, I freely admit that I'm guilty in booking to see shows with big actors I like, or am curious to see, so I'm contributing to it in a way. And to be fair, there have been a number of star led shows I have seen that have been excellent, such as 'Dr. Semmelweis' with Mark Rylance and 'An Enemy of the People' with Matt Smith. But it does make me a bit sad and worried that new and upcoming talent aren't being given enough opportunities to lead, or create new West End productions, because producers don't want to take financial risks. Shows like 'Operation Mincemeat' are outliers in the current theatre economy, whilst popular long-runners, revivals and star led productions seem to be dominating Theatreland at the moment.
I would say however, that this strategy is starting to show some signs of slowing down. A recent example would be the early closure of 'Opening Night', which also starred Sheridan Smith, due to mixed-to-negative critic reviews, resulting in low ticket sales. The same applies to last year's revival of 'Aspects of Love', which had Michael Ball of all people, but that wasn't enough to keep it running until it's intended close date either, which if you ask me, shows that star power won't always keep a show afloat and that it's not something producers can rely on if a production is poorly received.
But I suppose only time will tell really. Maybe we'll soon start to see less star led shows and more new talent on the London stage, along with audience behaviour improving? Or producers will double down on this current strategy for years to come, which leads to audience behaviour potentially worsening? Who knows really?
Apologies for going on this rather long tangent!
|
|
|
Post by sph on Jun 10, 2024 23:59:57 GMT
While I hate the casting of non-actors in shows, I think the idea of selling a show based on a name "star" is something that has been going for decades, generations, possibly centuries!
Traditionally the star's name would even be billed above the title, because their presence in the show was deemed a bigger selling point than the title of the show itself.
Crowds of screaming fans have been around a long, loooong time.
Is it different now? I think the only way I can think of that it is, is that actors are more "accessible" nowadays via social media etc, and young people, or indeed fans of any age, have more ability to travel cross-country (or even further) to see the shows they want to see. A few generations ago, multiple London visits in a short space of time to see a show would have seemed outrageous, nowadays it's quite achievable.
As for rude behaviour, I think that often comes down to the tendency we have nowadays to pander to the needs of the individual, rather than the needs of the wider community. People think that their needs and wants are far more important than those around them.
|
|
2,702 posts
|
Post by viserys on Jun 11, 2024 7:20:16 GMT
The internet, especially social media, has definitely been a massive game changer when it comes to fandoms. Fandoms are definitely nothing new, even in my early days (late 80s, early 90s) there was a rather toxic fandom around popular shows here in Germany and Austria. Fans that would treat the stage door as their regular meeting point, formed parasocial relationships with the performers (even if there was no word for it yet) and acted as "gatekeepers". Vienna had cheap standing room tickets that went on sale when the box office opened, so fans would start queuing for them early in the morning, which was a predecessor to the day seats/rush lines. But of course you had to be somewhat "tuned into" that scene to even know it existed. I was at the VERY fringes of it (I found it weird and obsessive even back then), but I knew that it mostly ran through personal meetings at stage doors and regular snail mail letters. There were countless "fanclubs" because so many fans were beset by the notion that they wanted to be "fan no.1" for someone and act at their spokesperson. Some stories I heard especially around the Tanz der Vampire fandom made my skin crawl (what is it with teenage girls and vampires?!) Nowadays teenagers who might only go with their families can follow everything on the internet and on social media and get the sense that hanging around stage doors is a perfectly normal part of the show, so they want to do this, too and it swells. And fans who would back then only be able to be a small part of things by exchanging letters with other fans and writing actual fan mail to performers they liked, can now easily "organize" with others and drift deeper and deeper into toxic fandom thanks to the possibilities of the internet. And of course social media keeps upping the stakes because everyone wants to be more "special" than the others. Then come the factors sph mentions: It's much easier to travel now than it used to be, so repeat performances are generally easier to achieve. And today's narcissism means that people feel incredibly entitled and want their own needs fulfilled. Funny enough it's been on the decline in Germany from all I know - mostly because there are virtually no cheap seats available for the big musicals that make repeat visits easy for fans (the way it used to be for us back then with 50% off student discounts for reasonable seats and those standing room tickets). I met a performer at a stage door last year (he asked me to, LOL!) and it was virtually deserted. Anyway... all this said... I feel there's a difference between that truly toxic fandom, the people that see the same shows 50-100 times, constantly visit stage doors and do that weird gatekeeping thing around favourite performers, and those people who are now venting about the new version of Starlight Express. Sure, it's not great to flood social media with negative comments (or trolling the poll here), but I think this is more a strange way of coping with their own dismay/frustration - and sadly today's way of coping often means to immediately shout every emotion out to the world via social media instead of spending a few days mulling things to put them into words and write a longer thoughtful post then.
|
|
3,484 posts
|
Post by ceebee on Jun 11, 2024 8:50:53 GMT
viserys I totally agree with you. I have found the comments about the new Starlight Express show astonishing. Some people were venting and criticising after the first preview, based on a couple of grainy phone videos. This is very unfair on the performers, many of whom are starting out on their first professional work (as indeed did many of the original Starlight Express cast). I know people who decided to go in to the business as a result of being inspired by the original Starlight Express. It's amazing that a show that is meant to be fun, unlock your inner child, suspend disbelief and just enjoy the thrill and spectacle of it all is being analysed and critiqued into the ground by some after a couple of performances. I saw the show on Sunday and I felt pride and elation for the cast. To have so many debutees doing such a great job is a real credit to themselves, the casting director, director and everybody involved with the show. To be frank, Al Knott as Greaseball was sensational from the outset on Sunday, and by the end of the show you could tell she had given it everything and must have been exhausted. I wish that the harsher critics - if they are superfans of the original - could perhaps just track back and recall what made them fall in love with the show in the first place. Above all, they should remember that behind the characters are real people living real lives, trying to entertain us in the process. Nothing stays the same and everything changes. It is fine for people to disagree or dislike a production, but when it is detrimental to people, productions or simply creates a false view of the reality, I seriously wonder what perverse pleasure such trolls get from being disruptors, other than the shallow vindication of having expressed an alternative view, even if it trashes the effort and confidence of others.
|
|
2,702 posts
|
Post by viserys on Jun 11, 2024 9:05:55 GMT
I wish that the harsher critics - if they are superfans of the original - could perhaps just track back and recall what made them fall in love with the show in the first place. Above all, they should remember that behind the characters are real people living real lives, trying to entertain us in the process. I think these are two more valid points in this debate: "Back in the days" (tm) fans might have disliked performers, but they might have said so quietly to someone else in private conversation and that was that. God knows I have a list of performers I want to avoid at all costs because they rubbed me the wrong way in some way or other. But today's social media means that these poor people are publicly hauled over the coals, torn apart and piled on. Which must be hard for anyone, whether budding talent or stalwart. And I feel there is a general attitude of older fans to look down on new stuff simply because times have changed. Again, when I was young and just starting out, the "mega musicals" of the day were my go-to-point and I was absolutely stunned that there were older people slagging them off. Only now, when I can see the development of musical theatre across the decades, can I understand that those mostly stationary shows with their many overwrought ballads or indeed crazy spectacles like Starlight Express were absolutely NOT what older people (who had grown up with the "Golden Age" musicals with their big choreographies and upbeat songs) were expecting from musicals. Similarly, now those of my age group who were weaned on the mega musicals bemoan so many of the current popular shows aimed at young people without realizing (I think) that they are simply not the target group, that we are now the fossils clinging to music styles popular 40 years ago (!). I struggled with this for quite some time, WANTING to feel like I had a foothold in modern musicals and was open to new things. But eventually I gave in and now I let many of the new shows just pass me by and instead rejoice in some classic revival or spontaneously book a trip a two-hour flight away to see an all-time-favourite musical again while I can. So... yea, I guess it would be better for them to accept that musical theatre has moved on and have the grace to simply say that this new Starlight Express is not for them. Time and thought may get them there.
|
|
|
Post by hannechalk on Jun 11, 2024 15:14:34 GMT
There is one very toxic woman on the West End - huge Phantom-fan.
Or maybe she's not toxic as such, but very deluded - she seems to think that musical theatre-stars, such as Michael Ball, are her personal friends, because they now recognise her.
The fact that it's more of 'Oh good grief, not her again' seems to completely escape her.
She is rude and abrasive if they do not stop and chat.
She really shot herself in the foot when she advertised her own birthday party, you could buy a ticket for £30 or £40 which included two drinks, and performances from many West End-stars. 95% were not aware they were performing - some knew of her, but made it very clear they had not agreed to perform. One poor young lady who had agreed was really excited because it would be her 'West End-debut'.
Really odd lady.
|
|
|
Post by PineappleForYou on Jun 11, 2024 15:19:02 GMT
There is one very toxic woman on the West End - huge Phantom-fan. Or maybe she's not toxic as such, but very deluded - she seems to think that musical theatre-stars, such as Michael Ball, are her personal friends, because they now recognise her. The fact that it's more of 'Oh good grief, not her again' seems to completely escape her. She is rude and abrasive if they do not stop and chat. She really shot herself in the foot when she advertised her own birthday party, you could buy a ticket for £30 or £40 which included two drinks, and performances from many West End-stars. 95% were not aware they were performing - some knew of her, but made it very clear they had not agreed to perform. One poor young lady who had agreed was really excited because it would be her 'West End-debut'. Really odd lady. Blimey, that's crazy. This feels kinda Baby Reindeer.
|
|
|
Post by westendboy on Jun 11, 2024 19:40:07 GMT
There is one very toxic woman on the West End - huge Phantom-fan. Or maybe she's not toxic as such, but very deluded - she seems to think that musical theatre-stars, such as Michael Ball, are her personal friends, because they now recognise her. The fact that it's more of 'Oh good grief, not her again' seems to completely escape her. She is rude and abrasive if they do not stop and chat. She really shot herself in the foot when she advertised her own birthday party, you could buy a ticket for £30 or £40 which included two drinks, and performances from many West End-stars. 95% were not aware they were performing - some knew of her, but made it very clear they had not agreed to perform. One poor young lady who had agreed was really excited because it would be her 'West End-debut'. Really odd lady. Now that's a rabbit hole I'm both intrigued and terrified to delve into.
|
|
19,778 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Jun 12, 2024 4:21:51 GMT
No names please.
|
|
8,153 posts
|
Post by alece10 on Jun 12, 2024 6:21:02 GMT
Oh I remember that. She even put out adverts. It's actually rather sad.
|
|
1,432 posts
|
Post by BVM on Jun 12, 2024 9:36:22 GMT
Loads of great points above :-)
I do agree that the toxic fandoms and the current Starlight complaining are two different things.
The toxic fandoms around the likes of Wicked, Six, Heathers, &Juliet are indeed based on phenomena we've seen for decades but have had their bad-ness and and problematic-ness exponentially increased by social media. The meeting of cast, stage dooring etc etc, they all see their mates doing it and wanna be in on the gang.
You also have the issue that (as a sweeping generalisation) actors love adulation. So can sometimes encourage this behaviour only to then feel the need to publicly "call things out" when it inevitably tips over the line (CHF, Layton Williams). Though in fairness others remain very humble and almost bemused by the attention and aren't actually on social media encouraging things (Jordan Luke Gage).
But it's certainly an odd world and very typical of our times. Luckily (for me) they don't tend to be the kind of shows I go for. Though I did feel uncomfortable sitting in the Heathers audience and it may have affected my enjoyment.
The Starlight Express negativity however isn't really coming from the fandom. It's mainly coming from Facebook Huns/casual fans who saw the show once or twice in the 80's and 90's, haven't really followed it's development since then and are now coming face to face with the fact it's a different show. It's annoying for sure. And as stated above pretty rude to the performers. But it's inevitable on sites like Facebook and is pretty typical of the discourse on most things on there so am not surprised. One would hope if and when they actually SEE they show they may feel differently but who knows.
I am on the peripheries of Starlight "fandom" - it generally isn't my thing but it's my fave show so am in a lot of groups. Would have zero interest in meeting the actors etc though or ever being within breath of a stage door! But as a fandom we are very used to change! So while there is nostalgia and sadness of what's been lost, there is generally openness and understanding that it's a new version to be judged on it's own merits. And I have to say out of all the fandoms I have vaguely interacted with over the years, the Starlight ones tend to be a very tolerant, down to earth and accepting bunch! (I do always have to take the Phans reactions to changes as mildly amusing when you compare Troubadour today to AV 1984 and all that's been presented in the intervening 40 years!)
|
|
1,432 posts
|
Post by BVM on Jun 12, 2024 9:44:18 GMT
viserys I totally agree with you. I have found the comments about the new Starlight Express show astonishing. Some people were venting and criticising after the first preview, based on a couple of grainy phone videos. This is very unfair on the performers, many of whom are starting out on their first professional work (as indeed did many of the original Starlight Express cast). I know people who decided to go in to the business as a result of being inspired by the original Starlight Express. It's amazing that a show that is meant to be fun, unlock your inner child, suspend disbelief and just enjoy the thrill and spectacle of it all is being analysed and critiqued into the ground by some after a couple of performances. I saw the show on Sunday and I felt pride and elation for the cast. To have so many debutees doing such a great job is a real credit to themselves, the casting director, director and everybody involved with the show. To be frank, Al Knott as Greaseball was sensational from the outset on Sunday, and by the end of the show you could tell she had given it everything and must have been exhausted. I wish that the harsher critics - if they are superfans of the original - could perhaps just track back and recall what made them fall in love with the show in the first place. Above all, they should remember that behind the characters are real people living real lives, trying to entertain us in the process. Nothing stays the same and everything changes. It is fine for people to disagree or dislike a production, but when it is detrimental to people, productions or simply creates a false view of the reality, I seriously wonder what perverse pleasure such trolls get from being disruptors, other than the shallow vindication of having expressed an alternative view, even if it trashes the effort and confidence of others. Totally agree! Al Knott was wonderful and for this kinda stuff you just have to go in with an open mind! If you haven't seen the show, you could say (as many have) "female Greaseball - WTF!?" But in the context of the show it is totally fluid with all the re-writes and doesn't stick out at all. And Al was indeed fantastic - Rolling Stock and Pumping Iron delivered as the bangers they always have been!
|
|
|
Post by hannechalk on Jun 12, 2024 9:56:26 GMT
I am going to call out my own fandom - I run a fan community for Blood Brothers on Facebook.
A post was very specific - 'Who have you missed seeing as Mrs J, but you would love to.'. Nothing about best or worst.
A few people took that as an invite to be very rude about certain actresses.
And they did not take it well when their comments were removed.
The reason I will not allow negative comments or reviews is because I am very lucky to have cast past and present interacting on my page, and it should be a safe space for everyone.
'Freedom of speech' and 'free country' were uttered - that does not give you a free ticket to being just plain rude.
|
|
1,127 posts
|
Post by samuelwhiskers on Jun 12, 2024 11:19:59 GMT
What strikes me is this kinda stuff is nearly always over musical theatre, not straight plays (unless it's a play with a household name TV or movie star in the lead). MT culture seems to lend it itself to people with a somewhat obsessive nature. It's not uncommon to see fans determined to 'collect' a show via watching every combination of actors, or by needing to see every single cast change. I haven't come across that with straight plays.
Having said that there's one infamous stan who's latched onto the London straight play scene and has stalked actors, directors, and even playwrights. She tries to gatecrash or blag every single press night and awards do, or pulls stunts like going to a preview and taking selfies then posting them on press night to pretend she was there, or buying public allocation balcony tickets to West End presses then hunting round in the interval hoping to pick a discarded stalls comps off the floor or out of a bin to post on social media. She spent a good few years stalking a famous playwright to the point of police involvement, and for ages she was pretending online that she was in some kind of relationship with him, endless social media posts bragging about attending West End openings as his plus one or spending the night partying with him at afterparties, when everyone who was actually at those openings saw her waiting outside for hours to pounce on him for a selfie or heard him talking about what a nutcase she was.
Like really who stalks playwrights. Raise your ambitions.
There was also a different female stan who stalked Benedict Cumberbatch during Frankenstein and decided to take it upon herself to throw a closing night party for the production, hired a random room at the NT for that same evening, printed out invitations and started giving them to all and sundry pretending it was the official NT closing night party, then had to suffer the indignity of seeing Cumby, Danny Boyle et al walk past and go into the BFI Southbank for the actual closing night party directly. I vaguely remember her posting that she'd been going into local businesses where she lived giving out invitations to, like, her dry cleaner and the people who worked in her local fish and chip shop.
|
|
7,176 posts
|
Post by Jon on Jun 12, 2024 11:37:58 GMT
This is a sweeping generalisation but it does seem that some of these fans have some sort of mental illness.
|
|
|
Post by hannechalk on Jun 12, 2024 14:24:21 GMT
This is a sweeping generalisation but it does seem that some of these fans have some sort of mental illness. As a member of the mentally ill-community, we do not claim them. 😀
|
|
7,176 posts
|
Post by Jon on Jun 12, 2024 14:32:12 GMT
This is a sweeping generalisation but it does seem that some of these fans have some sort of mental illness. As a member of the mentally ill-community, we do not claim them. 😀 I would like to clarify that I'm not tarring people who have mental illnesses with the same brush but I do think that going to extremes such as the examples given above is very unhealthy.
|
|
1,432 posts
|
Post by BVM on Jun 12, 2024 14:58:02 GMT
As a member of the mentally ill-community, we do not claim them. 😀 I would like to clarify that I'm not tarring people who have mental illnesses with the same brush but I do think that going to extremes such as the examples given above is very unhealthy. Agree this level of obsessive behaviour is likely both resulting from and causing (to the person displaying it, even if we can’t see it) significant mental distress.
|
|
|
Post by hannechalk on Jun 12, 2024 16:20:37 GMT
As a member of the mentally ill-community, we do not claim them. 😀 I would like to clarify that I'm not tarring people who have mental illnesses with the same brush but I do think that going to extremes such as the examples given above is very unhealthy. I know you didn't, I was jesting. I agree with you.
|
|
4,156 posts
|
Post by kathryn on Jun 13, 2024 16:37:09 GMT
Yes, there’s a lot of untreated mental illness out there - and an awful lot of toxic fan behaviour both in real life and online is a symptom of it.
There’s also some people who are just plain bullies - they were bullies as kids at school, and they continue to be bullies as adults. They enjoy making other people feel bad - they get a sadistic little kick out of it. They are deliberately making those nasty and negative comments on places where the cast or the creatives - or even other fans - will see them.
These days most workplaces and businesses have dignity at work and anti-bullying policies, so it’s not so easy to get their kicks in person. But there are very rarely consequences for being a bully on social media, particularly if you keep it low-level enough that you evade bans. They can hide behind ‘free speech!’ and ‘it’s just my opinion’ and ‘can’t you take a joke?’ and ‘if you’re going to put yourself in the public eye you have to be able to take criticism!’, and most of the time you’ll get away with it.
|
|