|
Post by iwanttix on Jul 5, 2024 10:57:35 GMT
Ive got a ticket for this week - they seem to reduce the front row to £20 the week before so kept an eye out and booked a ticket as soon as it went down. Nice work. I’m checking back regularly for the date I’m after! Would be good to know once you’ve been if you’d agree with the opinion/s further up this thread that the view is fine from there. I went last night and thought the view was great. Maybe a slight ache to the neck but as it's a contained set, and the stage not being high, it's actually a great view. Glad to see that you managed to get a £20 seat for the date you wanted! Really enjoyed the play overall and would recommend it.
|
|
7,193 posts
|
Post by Jon on Jul 5, 2024 11:17:56 GMT
I managed to £20 ticket in the back of the stalls so hopefully it will be a decent view.
|
|
183 posts
|
Post by bee on Jul 6, 2024 17:34:45 GMT
I saw the matinee of this today and really liked it. As has been noted, it's a very straightforward rendition with none of the stylistic flourishes of the Young Vic production but I think it stands up pretty well even against that. I thought Dominic West was marvellous. I would nevertheless agree with merrilywereadalong above who noted that it loses some focus after the interval.
|
|
|
Post by adamkinsey on Jul 6, 2024 18:52:47 GMT
At the matinee today. Thought Dominic West was an excellent Eddie and the production was pacier than many I've seen. Too often it's played slowly and stodgily as if it was wholly serious with no humour or lightness which is clearly there in the text whereas this was much lighter from the outset which meant when there was tension you genuinely felt it. However the audience laughed a lot when Eddie kissed Rudolfo and I agree with others that it lost focus in the second half.
|
|
|
Post by oedipus on Jul 7, 2024 11:01:52 GMT
Caught this on Thursday evening. My thoughts track fairly close with those of this board: that Dominic West was terrific (as was Pierro Niel-Mee as Marco) and that the production was a success on account of its straight-forward (good) acting. My only reservation was the set. Yes, I get that using the same set for both the inside/outside meant that the whole stage was a sort of panopticon, with the entire neighborhood (including us!) peering in on the private, troubled world of the family. But since the creative team was going for the feel of depressing/depressed, the big brown wall and fire escape didn't provide much visual interest, and the lighting had to do a lot of work, particularly in the 2nd half. Since the production was so traditional anyway, I guess I would have preferred a traditional scene change as well (like a revolve).
But this is now my third "traditional" View from the Bridge (I caught the other two in regional productions), and this was the most affecting; it made me see the "Old World" (=masculine) values of Marco in a way that I hadn't considered before. I hadn't before absorbed how clearly Marco is figured as everything Eddie would *want* to be -- excepting his citizenship status. So Eddie's crisis of masculinity/sexuality plays out across the two acts as Marco becomes larger-than-life and Eddie struggles with his inner demons.
So: four stars. And saw it from the mid-stalls (the view from the stalls was great. The view from the bridge, is, of course, tragic ;-).
|
|
1,250 posts
|
Post by joem on Jul 28, 2024 23:20:29 GMT
Having seen the Alan Ayckbourn production starring Michael Gambon - which at the time, and for many years after, I thought the finest performance I'd ever seen by a male actor on stage - this had a lot of living up to do. Also saw Ken Stott in a decent production which also starred Mary Elizabeth Mastroiano and a young Hayley Atwell.
I believe this is Miller's finest, most accessible, play where he really nails the idea of writing a classical tragedy in a classless manner. Eddie Carbone is as heroic and tragically flawed as any Shakespearean ruler or Ibsenian middle-class protagonist and his being a "mere" longshoreman makes this no less of a tragedy.
It's a production played with a pretty straight bat and tat's what makes it work. There's no attempt to reimagine it as a present-day work because it isn't and because it's good enough for its narrative, concerns and themes to be timeless. Dominic West puts on a very good performance and if his muscly, attractive characterisation brings a rather different vibe to that of a jowly, defeated Gambon, well that's not his fault.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jul 29, 2024 5:55:46 GMT
Having seen the Alan Ayckbourn production starring Michael Gambon - which at the time, and for many years after, I thought the finest performance I'd ever seen by a male actor on stage Yes same here. But overall the Ivo van Hove production was even better - two of the greatest productions of all those I've seen were of the same play which says something about it. But Miller was never entirely happy with it - it started as a one-act drama in verse and he then re-wrote it several times and he was never happy with the the way the Greek elements from the original draft were integrated into the final version and in fact he wrote and produced a third version with a different ending which is not the one we usually see today.
|
|
|
Post by aspieandy on Jul 29, 2024 13:56:17 GMT
Just a reminder; last week for this one.
Have been waiting for Rush but no luck so picked up a £25 might-not-see-all-one-side jobs in the Upper Circle. Saturday matinee. Big theatre but can't go too wrong.
|
|
1,291 posts
|
Post by theatrefan77 on Jul 29, 2024 16:02:25 GMT
I enjoyed this overall although not a patch with the Ivo van Hove production, which I loved.
Dominic West is excellent, but the rest of the cast are a mixed bag.
|
|