1,250 posts
|
Post by joem on Dec 1, 2023 0:12:27 GMT
If I'd seen this play at the Park or Southwark I might have rated it better. There are funny moments and I think the acting of the two leading ladies is pretty good, if not helped by their parts. But this is a very expensive product and the audience has a right to be more demanding when it is being asked to pay very high prices for tickets.
Nice set, nicely staged but whilst I have seen plays which combine tragic and comic elements successfully, here the laughs and the serious stuff work against each other which - when combined with the pretty average writing - leaves you wondering if the whole thing is just built on a fantasy and makes you question what the writer is trying to achieve. The KST character is like a stray from a Tennessee Williams play who has wandered into a sequel for The Lady In The Van so the trauma being experienced by the Lily James character pales and you end up watching the two key characters bumbling along in clumsy slapsticky routines which diminishes the dignity and credibility of the roles.
I have to say the audience reaction was fairly positive and wonder... might we end up with theatre where the actors, or celebrities, become the only reason to see a production? The critics may hate it, discerning theatregoers might scoff but if bums are put firmly on seats at prices well skywards of £100 and now moving beyond £200... the producers may worry less about quality. Like blockbuster movies which are panned but make tons at the box office. Is this a potential future for theatre?
|
|
3,585 posts
|
Post by Rory on Dec 1, 2023 0:24:47 GMT
If I'd seen this play at the Park or Southwark I might have rated it better. There are funny moments and I think the acting of the two leading ladies is pretty good, if not helped by their parts. But this is a very expensive product and the audience has a right to be more demanding when it is being asked to pay very high prices for tickets. Nice set, nicely staged but whilst I have seen plays which combine tragic and comic elements successfully, here the laughs and the serious stuff work against each other which - when combined with the pretty average writing - leaves you wondering if the whole thing is just built on a fantasy and makes you question what the writer is trying to achieve. The KST character is like a stray from a Tennessee Williams play who has wandered into a sequel for The Lady In The Van so the trauma being experienced by the Lily James character pales and you end up watching the two key characters bumbling along in clumsy slapsticky routines which diminishes the dignity and credibility of the roles. I have to say the audience reaction was fairly positive and wonder... might we end up with theatre where the actors, or celebrities, become the only reason to see a production? The critics may hate it, discerning theatregoers might scoff but if bums are put firmly on seats at prices well skywards of £100 and now moving beyond £200... the producers may worry less about quality. Like blockbuster movies which are panned but make tons at the box office. Is this a potential future for theatre? My guess is that Sonia Friedman and Ian Rickson, creatives of integrity, will have been very stung by the critical mauling this has received and will learn from it. That it has been a commercial success is a matter of good fortune, and largely due to a starry cast, strong sales before opening and a no refund policy.
|
|
176 posts
|
Post by Sean on Dec 2, 2023 9:44:12 GMT
Ticket for this Thursday matinee on the Notice board
|
|
1,486 posts
|
Post by theatrefan62 on Dec 2, 2023 10:06:26 GMT
might we end up with theatre where the actors, or celebrities, become the only reason to see a production? Hasn't that always been the case though? For many years. Plenty of productions (good and bad) have all hinged on the star(s) as the main draw. 'It's worth seeing just for....' is quite a common phrase
|
|
|
Post by topaz on Dec 7, 2023 14:48:06 GMT
|
|
1,204 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by mattnyc on Dec 8, 2023 12:41:39 GMT
I saw the matinee yesterday and have a genuine question (that’s a spoiler) -
Was this play written so the audience is supposed to side with the Lily James character at the end, when her husband comes to take her home? Because the audience reaction was pretty much on her side and I’m sitting there thinking this man is the only person in 2 1/2 hours who’s making any sense at all.
|
|