West End or Broadway

Tough one. I've been seeing shows in the West End for much longer than on Broadway (first visited New York in 2009 and only started flying over regularly in 2014).

I prefer the atmosphere in the West End. And Broadway audiences can be quite annoying at least from my experience. But for me sitting down in a theatre on Broadway to watch a show is extra exciting for sure (however, that might just be because I've been seeing West End shows for so long it doesn't feel that special anymore).

If you like seeing stars on stage (and I mean actual stars, not z celebrities) Broadway definitely is the place to go. Not saying the West End doesn't attract star names but Broadway is another level.

It can't be "either or" for me. Broadway admittedly tends to have more good new musicals, but the West End has the edge on plays.

Overall I think the West End wins for me. All other things aside there's the geographical aspect: I can always pop over to London for a weekend, but I don't see a point in wasting so much money on expensive transatlantic flights to always the same location when there are so many interesting cities to see in the world.

Other points:

* Okay, on Broadway it's often easier to get generous 40-50%-off discounts in advance, but they don't have anything as wonderful as our cheap front row dayseats (their "rush" is often limited to students and then often bad seats)

* The West End doesn't do the kind of insane hype Broadway does (see Producers, Book of Mormon and now of course Hamilton) with insane ticket prices to boot.

* Times Square. Can't tolerate it. It's the seventh circle of hell for me. Leicester Square is unfortunately heading that way too but since theatres are more spread out, it's much easier to avoid.

PS: I disagree that you can see more "stars" on Broadway. Yes, you get the odd Hollywood star there like Tom Hanks or Bruce Willis (!) since they are Americans starring in the American theatre capital. But I wouldn't think of people like Judi Dench, Helen Mirren, Tom Hiddleston, Benny Cumberbatch (etc etc) as lesser stars.

Totally agree about the "stars" thing! All those names are huge, and there have been loads more too! 

I think it would be nice if Leicester Square had huge signs for West End shows and direction to theatres, like Times Square does! 

Of course the West End gets stars too. Lots of them. :-)
I still feel Broadway gets more of them, especially those that basically everyone knows and that - in true Broadway style - will get their name above the title of the show on the posters.

But a star name rarely is the reason I see a show (unless it's Hugh Jackman). And when it comes to great plays I think the West End is ahead of Broadway while Broadway wins in the musical department.
Although I don't watch a lot of Broadway shows when I'm over these days so can only judge from the limited amount of Broadway I've seen.

I think Broadway wins in the new musical department but I think West End wins in plays and the West End pull of some cracking musical revivals too! Just look at all the revivals we've had recently - and they've all been amazing!

When I was there a tout realising I was English and he wouldn't be able to rinse me as he was looking for a big musicals profit dismissed me with a 'oh you're English, you'll only like plays'.

Eh, are they really more exciting, or is there just more hype?

The flow of both 'stars' and young talented actors goes both ways, with home-grown talent from both countries generally wanting to go back to their theatre roots at some point. I can't see that changing.

One thing is for sure, the West End is cheaper, and we're generally better at cheap ticket schemes and trying to attract a younger audience. In fact Roundabout's 'young person' scheme, Hiptix, is for anyone 35 and under - if you're defining 35 as 'young' and needing a discount your audience has got to be skewing really old and rich! I could never afford to go as frequently to Broadway shows as I do to West End ones.

They say you see a play in London and go to New York to see a show, the problem is I have seen some brilliant musicals in London and cracking plays in New York.

London is the epicentre for theatre, we do more plays on the South Bank that Broadway and off Broadway do put together. New York thinks it is the authority in theatre, but that is bogus, because it pays the wages and attracts the big stars (who where ear pieces, Bruce Willis, Al Pacino, Forest Whitaker) and publishes its grosses, but in New York you have so many hanger ons, that make production costs astronomical, I have seen really decent stuff in New York, but their theater is bloated.

Also their theatres can be dark for long periods, where we have back to back shows here.

Broadly the West End is better for plays and Broadway is better for musicals, but I'd happily go to neither ever again as long as I still got to go to the National, the Globe, the Almeida, the Bush, the Young Vic, the Chocolate Factory, etc. I'm very happy with London as a theatre capital, and there's WAY more out there than the West End, a lot of which is WAY better.

I used to prefer the West End, but the more I went to see Broadway, the more I fell in love with it. 

What the West End wins on:
The plays are definitely better over here. Don't actually ever think I've ever seen a 5-star play on B.Way, been to two 5-stars Off-Broadway (Grounded and The Spoils), but that's it. They have good plays, but none that compare to the ones over here. 
Ticket prices are better, although recently, not that much better. 
The theatre's are organised a lot better. B.Way have a stupid system of having a long queue outside the theatre, leaving you little time to go to your seats. I love how some West End theatres open their bars an hour before.

What Broadway wins on:
Hamilton
They have a lot of fresh new musicals, which the West End seem to be lacking. The new musicals we do have all seem to flop.
Hamilton
The atmosphere of a Broadway theatre. Perhaps it's just because I go to the West End so often, but there's just such a magical atmosphere when I enter a B.Way theatre.
Hamilton
They seem to have better stars, ones that appeal to me more anyway. Because of B.Way I have managed to see some of my favourite actors of all time.
Hamilton
I don't know why, correct me if I'm wrong, but do B.Way shows have a bigger budget? They just seem grander.
Hamilton
The Tony's are better done than the Olivier's
Hamilton
The majority of my favourite shows are on B.Way, including Hamilton.

I do think that Broadway wins in producing the new musicals section. All the new musicals over here, that sell well, seem to be transfers from Broadway. I'd love to see more British musicals being made.

I do think, however, that the Oliviers are just as good as the TONYs?! I think the Oliviers are marvellous, and they are certainly getting bigger seen as they're going to the Royal Albert Hall next year. I think the atmosphere is better here too and we seem to understand theatre etiquette better.

Plays seem to be better over here too.

I do think we win on musical revivals though. Doesn't anyone else agree? The amount of musical revivals over here, in recent years, have been great! They all seem to do well financially and attract great star names!

The Oliviers and Tonys argument isn't a fair comparison. There is SO much money thrown at the Tonys, and they have a much greater exposure.

I also think we're matched in regard to Musical Revivals. We have Chichester and Sheffield, but they have the Lincoln Centre and Roundabout.