1,102 posts
|
Post by zak97 on Sept 22, 2016 7:49:52 GMT
Apparently they sent a note out saying all recordings made by fans at the 10th will be destroyed. Could this mean they're doing a live recording? I mean surely if a fan just recorded audio, how would they know? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2016 8:46:23 GMT
Apparently they sent a note out saying all recordings made by fans at the 10th will be destroyed. Could this mean they're doing a live recording? I mean surely if a fan just recorded audio, how would they know? Very true. I don't know how they'd do that either. But just the fact that they sent it out for this occasion should mean something? |
|
2,763 posts
|
Post by daniel on Sept 22, 2016 8:55:12 GMT
I honestly wouldn't look too far into that. They just don't want people recording the show as its against copyright. I guess by flagging it so clearly, they're also trying to remind people who would be tempted to photograph/film any of it, not to.
|
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on Sept 22, 2016 9:02:10 GMT
Apparently they sent a note out saying all recordings made by fans at the 10th will be destroyed. Could this mean they're doing a live recording? I mean surely if a fan just recorded audio, how would they know? Mostly, it's fairly obvious and even I notice when my seat neighbours record the show, as they just keep their smartphone on their lap, on top of their handbag or backpack or put it in their shirt pocket. |
|
4,799 posts
|
Post by The Matthew on Sept 22, 2016 9:36:43 GMT
If someone next to you is recording be sure to cough loudly and frequently, shuffle around in your seat a lot, and occasionally quack.
|
|
571 posts
|
Post by westendwendy on Sept 22, 2016 10:36:30 GMT
Goodness I hope not. I love Wicked and saw it twice on Broadway. Sensational show. However the changes to the UK accents just don't make the piece work in London - it's like having Grease set in Hull. Like the Golden Girls being reproduced to the Brighton Belles (anyone remember that one?)
I saw Wicked on the West End a month ago and the staging and singing were great. The audience sniggered once or twice, on Broadway people were hysterical.
Even Kerry Ellis and others don't really know if to sing Wizard and I in an American accent or not. The vowels, phrasing and clueless style American college comedy was written for America.
The OBC is the ultimate. Especially when it comes to Glinda/Kristin.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2016 10:44:35 GMT
Goodness I hope not. I love Wicked and saw it twice on Broadway. Sensational show. However the changes to the UK accents just don't make the piece work in London - it's like having Grease set in Hull. Like the Golden Girls being reproduced to the Brighton Belles (anyone remember that one?) I saw Wicked on the West End a month ago and the staging and singing were great. The audience sniggered once or twice, on Broadway people were hysterical. Even Kerry Ellis and others don't really know if to sing Wizard and I in an American accent or not. The vowels, phrasing and clueless style American college comedy was written for America. The OBC is the ultimate. Especially when it comes to Glinda/Kristin. It's all a matter of perspective. I got to know the British production before I got to know the American, and now the American always seems weird to me. Remember that shows like Grease are actually set in America. Wicked is not set in America, it's set in Oz. And the OBC is far from the ultimate for me. I actually prefer some bootleg recordings to the OBC. On the OBC, the orchestra also sounds pretty cheap on some tracks for some reason. But without a doubt the biggest problem with the OBC is Idina's singing. It's a matter of personal taste. Some people might like the OBC, but I think there are many people who would prefer a new (possibly, but not necessarily British) recording. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2016 11:48:46 GMT
Some sort of "Mis Compete Symphonic" type recording could be fun, featuring an "uber cast" of the best of the world's productions... Part of the fun will be the fan reactions to who gets to be recorded, of course. Could melt the internet, no water required. That could be fun. But I think that if we get a new one before the movie soundtrack, it will be a London live recording. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2016 11:49:15 GMT
If someone next to you is recording be sure to cough loudly and frequently, shuffle around in your seat a lot, and occasionally quack. Hey! I was gonna listen to that! |
|
|
|
Post by partytentdown on Sept 22, 2016 13:03:21 GMT
The German cast recording has them singing over the Broadway orchestra. Clearly a cheap way of doing it, and if I was one of the musicians I'd be up in arms. (But better than nothing for the consumer??!) Live like Miss Saigon - great. Live like Kinky Boots - dreadful. The only OLC to feature extensive audience coughing. Pathetic eye to detail, no idea how this got signed off. Ha, where is the coughing?! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2016 13:16:23 GMT
The German cast recording has them singing over the Broadway orchestra. Clearly a cheap way of doing it, and if I was one of the musicians I'd be up in arms. (But better than nothing for the consumer??!) Live like Miss Saigon - great. Live like Kinky Boots - dreadful. The only OLC to feature extensive audience coughing. Pathetic eye to detail, no idea how this got signed off. Ha, where is the coughing?! I've never heard any coughing, but then again I haven't listened to that album that often. Recording it live will be cheaper and a great way to capture the excitement that will be in the air for the anniversary. |
|
|
|
Post by partytentdown on Sept 22, 2016 13:21:22 GMT
Ha, where is the coughing?! I've never heard any coughing, but then again I haven't listened to that album that often. Recording it live will be cheaper and a great way to capture the excitement that will be in the air for the anniversary. The Kinky Boots New York recording is a clearer recording but the accents are a bit strange |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2016 13:26:46 GMT
I've never heard any coughing, but then again I haven't listened to that album that often. Recording it live will be cheaper and a great way to capture the excitement that will be in the air for the anniversary. The Kinky Boots New York recording is a clearer recording but the accents are a bit strange I'm not too familiar with the recordings of Kinky Boots, but for example the live recording of Miss Saigon is of amazing quality, so if they did it right it would be a great idea to make a live recording of Wicked. |
|
377 posts
|
Post by Nelly on Sept 22, 2016 13:40:09 GMT
The Legally Blonde London 'live' cast recording is particularly shoddy. Sound levels all over the place and also some audience coughs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2016 14:47:28 GMT
The Legally Blonde London 'live' cast recording is particularly shoddy. Sound levels all over the place and also some audience coughs. How old is that recording though? I think they've gotten better at recording live in the last few years |
|
377 posts
|
Post by Nelly on Sept 22, 2016 15:40:35 GMT
The Legally Blonde London 'live' cast recording is particularly shoddy. Sound levels all over the place and also some audience coughs. How old is that recording though? I think they've gotten better at recording live in the last few years Released in 2010. It's got nothing to do with technology being poor to be honest. You only have to look at the We Will Rock You cast recording which was released in 2002 or the Mary Poppins Australian Live cast recording released a year after the LB one. Both are excellent. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2016 16:35:15 GMT
I've never heard any coughing, Reminds me of some show "live recording" they did, where one actor was supposed to enter in a wooden box. When he didn't stand up at the correct moment, they stopped the show, opened it, and found he had expired while waiting for his cue. The coroner decided that the box had been too small, and that the actor had died from a "bad fit of coffin." I'll get me coat... lol! This cracked me up xD |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2016 16:36:07 GMT
How old is that recording though? I think they've gotten better at recording live in the last few years Released in 2010. It's got nothing to do with technology being poor to be honest. You only have to look at the We Will Rock You cast recording which was released in 2002 or the Mary Poppins Australian Live cast recording released a year after the LB one. Both are excellent. Good point. If they just make the effort to do it right, it will sound great, like Miss Saigon. |
|
2,041 posts
|
Post by 49thand8th on Sept 22, 2016 17:23:30 GMT
Apparently they sent a note out saying all recordings made by fans at the 10th will be destroyed. Could this mean they're doing a live recording? Who is "they" and how would "they" be able to remotely get into people's phones and other devices to destroy data? |
|
4,369 posts
|
Post by Michael on Sept 22, 2016 17:35:05 GMT
They are The Man.
|
|
|
|
Post by welsh_tenor on Sept 22, 2016 17:37:38 GMT
Apparently they sent a note out saying all recordings made by fans at the 10th will be destroyed. Could this mean they're doing a live recording? Who is "they" and how would "they" be able to remotely get into people's phones and other devices to destroy data? To quote the letter, "Unauthorised recordings will be confiscated and cancelled." |
|
|
|
Post by welsh_tenor on Sept 22, 2016 17:54:56 GMT
Ok... don't immediately discount this wild theory.....
You don't think this "fans in the circle & celebs in the stalls" could be a big rouse for the live recording??!
We have all said how they can't fill just the stalls with YouTubers and friends and family so is there a chance that they ARE doing a live recording and those in the stalls are in the know to be on best behaviour with some seats being left empty for sound engineers etc?
That way the crazys are all upstairs and with only the downstairs mic'd for crowd noise it will be a controlled live recording?!
I'm. A. Genius*.
*probably not but you heard it hear first!
|
|
46 posts
|
Post by chrisorsomething on Sept 22, 2016 18:04:09 GMT
I think I went off on one about this in another thread and related to another show (maybe Phantom) but it's all tied into contracts, residuals, movie soundtrack deals etc etc etc. Boring stuff which fans don't understand/care about so choose to ignore and continue with their discussion
|
|
46 posts
|
Post by chrisorsomething on Sept 22, 2016 18:05:18 GMT
In other words I doubt there will be an official recording released purely for contractual reasons
|
|
2,041 posts
|
Post by 49thand8th on Sept 22, 2016 18:25:31 GMT
Who is "they" and how would "they" be able to remotely get into people's phones and other devices to destroy data? To quote the letter, "Unauthorised recordings will be confiscated and cancelled." That's weird. And not really feasible to execute. |
|
2,763 posts
|
Post by daniel on Sept 22, 2016 18:37:17 GMT
I think they mean more "if we see you filming or taking photos we'll take it off you and delete it. If we don't see you do it because you're audio recorder is in your top pocket/under your seat/wherever, well we can't actually stop you, but hopefully we've scared you off the idea"
|
|
2,763 posts
|
Post by daniel on Sept 22, 2016 18:39:42 GMT
Although to further add, they can't confiscate your phone anyway unless they've got an SIA badge.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2016 19:45:40 GMT
I think I went off on one about this in another thread and related to another show (maybe Phantom) but it's all tied into contracts, residuals, movie soundtrack deals etc etc etc. Boring stuff which fans don't understand/care about so choose to ignore and continue with their discussion Surely they'd have negotiated the option to make a West End recording when the show first opened? I think there actually were plans to record one back in 2006, but for some reason it didn't happen back then. |
|
2,763 posts
|
Post by daniel on Sept 22, 2016 22:29:59 GMT
I think I went off on one about this in another thread and related to another show (maybe Phantom) but it's all tied into contracts, residuals, movie soundtrack deals etc etc etc. Boring stuff which fans don't understand/care about so choose to ignore and continue with their discussion Surely they'd have negotiated the option to make a West End recording when the show first opened? I think there actually were plans to record one back in 2006, but for some reason it didn't happen back then. As previously stated by another member, there was going to be one but producers wanted to use the Broadway recording for the orchestra, which understandably the London musicians weren't happy about. So in the end it didn't happen. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2016 22:32:45 GMT
Surely they'd have negotiated the option to make a West End recording when the show first opened? I think there actually were plans to record one back in 2006, but for some reason it didn't happen back then. As previously stated by another member, there was going to be one but producers wanted to use the Broadway recording for the orchestra, which understandably the London musicians weren't happy about. So in the end it didn't happen. Yeah, but that would mean they had permission to do a West End recording in the first place. The question is for how long was that permission valid? |
|
