5,582 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jan 23, 2018 18:41:51 GMT
Troilus and Cressida is difficult to do and so not done that often and they don’t put it on the school syllabus. But it is so modern, so right now. I hope they do as good a job with it as say, Hytner did with his Othello.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jan 23, 2018 19:17:34 GMT
Much as I need to see Timon to tick one of the final three off my list, I am not tempted at all to see Kathryn Hunter on stage again. I find her mannered performing style just too much for my tastes. Shame as I managed to be miss it when it was on at the National (the joys of being ill on the day I was due to attend as far as I recall!) I suspect Tamburlaine will have a big name in the lead to justify such an extended series of performances. No idea who. At least it won't be Sir Tony. T&C - all comes down to casting for me. Will have to be interesting to drag me to Stratford after the last one. Doran's pedestrian style will be easier to live with than the Wooster Group's. Agree on K.Hunter, her Cleopatra was a low point. On authorship, I see they have now assigned Henry VI to a Marlowe/Shakespeare collaboration. I like Troilus & Cressida and have not seen a bad production of it, save for the appalling Wooster Group farrago.
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Jan 23, 2018 19:25:06 GMT
I know academics love the whole authorship thing - but from a playgoer's perspective, it really doesn't bother me in the slightest as long as the text is theatrically vibrant and comes alive in the hands of talented actors under the guidance of a director with good taste.
Other than rejecting the Oxfordian school of thought as being ludicrous, I think whoever Shakespeare was and whoever he collaborated with (and when), some great plays were written that have become the mainstay of world theatre.
Yes, it is fun to play with the variants between the different folios and quartos to shape a performing version that works for my particular vision/cast - but as for the intricate analysis of each scene to work out if it was Shakespeare or Shakespeare and someone else, or just someone else entirely - that really doesn't impact on my enjoyment of a play on the stage.
|
|
1,119 posts
|
Post by martin1965 on Jan 23, 2018 19:28:54 GMT
Much as I need to see Timon to tick one of the final three off my list, I am not tempted at all to see Kathryn Hunter on stage again. I find her mannered performing style just too much for my tastes. Shame as I managed to be miss it when it was on at the National (the joys of being ill on the day I was due to attend as far as I recall!) I suspect Tamburlaine will have a big name in the lead to justify such an extended series of performances. No idea who. At least it won't be Sir Tony. T&C - all comes down to casting for me. Will have to be interesting to drag me to Stratford after the last one. Doran's pedestrian style will be easier to live with than the Wooster Group's. Agree on K.Hunter, her Cleopatra was a low point. On authorship, I see they have now assigned Henry VI to a Marlowe/Shakespeare collaboration. I like Troilus & Cressida and have not seen a bad production of it, save for the appalling Wooster Group farrago. I missed that about Henry 6 Prof, where was that? They have obvs made up with la hunter after she stropped off when Boyd didnt bring A&C to New York a few years back.
|
|
81 posts
|
Post by jasper on Jan 23, 2018 19:52:08 GMT
Much as I need to see Timon to tick one of the final three off my list, I am not tempted at all to see Kathryn Hunter on stage again. I find her mannered performing style just too much for my tastes. Shame as I managed to be miss it when it was on at the National (the joys of being ill on the day I was due to attend as far as I recall!) I suspect Tamburlaine will have a big name in the lead to justify such an extended series of performances. No idea who. At least it won't be Sir Tony. T&C - all comes down to casting for me. Will have to be interesting to drag me to Stratford after the last one. Doran's pedestrian style will be easier to live with than the Wooster Group's. Agree on K.Hunter, her Cleopatra was a low point. On authorship, I see they have now assigned Henry VI to a Marlowe/Shakespeare collaboration. I like Troilus & Cressida and have not seen a bad production of it, save for the appalling Wooster Group farrago. My first T&C was the late lamented John Barton's, which meant the bar was set so high others have not come near to it. Saw an terrible one by the Berliner Ensemble. Set was literally rubbish and costumes not much better. Treated the play like a cartoon to be played for laughs. Only good moment was at the end when they stopped acting and spoke the speech as intended and not like an in joke between us and them.
|
|
5,582 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jan 23, 2018 22:08:39 GMT
Henry VI a collaboration between Willie and Chris? Where is this discussed? Seems a very 'romantic' idea to me. A bit Shakespeare in Love.
|
|
|
Post by Honoured Guest on Jan 23, 2018 23:23:57 GMT
|
|
5,582 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jan 24, 2018 4:39:50 GMT
This is interesting. I’ve sometimes thought that people attributed to other writers the bits that aren’t so good. Of course I bow to superior scholarship. One thing though. The guys that published the First Folio actually knew Shakespeare. They don’t mention Marlowe as co writer. They are happy to assign all of what they publish to Shakespeare. Was this then a sign of the developing sense of single authorship or had they tactfully omitted an old mate best forgotten?
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jan 24, 2018 6:55:59 GMT
This is interesting. I’ve sometimes thought that people attributed to other writers the bits that aren’t so good. Of course I bow to superior scholarship. One thing though. The guys that published the First Folio actually knew Shakespeare. They don’t mention Marlowe as co writer. They are happy to assign all of what they publish to Shakespeare. Was this then a sign of the developing sense of single authorship or had they tactfully omitted an old mate best forgotten? The Folger Shakespeare Library do a podcast on Shakespeare and it was in one of those I heard about the Marlowe attribution, although I see our trusty Google operative HG has found another reference. It's a failure of nerve not to put Timon on in the main house - NT managed to fill the Olivier with it (with appropriate casting) and Doran's own production of it (with Michael Pennington replacing an indisposed Alan Bates) was in the main house (I think - it transferred to the Barbican main stage anyway).
|
|
1,119 posts
|
Post by martin1965 on Jan 24, 2018 8:58:58 GMT
Tend to agree with you, i saw the Pennington one at the Barbican. Did you see the David Suchet one at the Young Vic a while back? Really good. Maybe one reason for putting it in a Swan slot is to catch up with the folio project, they are behind imo and at this rate it will take nearly all of Doran's tenure.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jan 24, 2018 9:13:41 GMT
Tend to agree with you, i saw the Pennington one at the Barbican. Did you see the David Suchet one at the Young Vic a while back? Really good. Maybe one reason for putting it in a Swan slot is to catch up with the folio project, they are behind imo and at this rate it will take nearly all of Doran's tenure. Yes I saw the Trevor Nunn/David Suchet/Young Vic one - the best I've seen I think. It made sense of the plot - years later it emerged this was because Nunn had put in hundreds of lines he'd written himself - and handling the later scenes as if they'd been written by Samuel Beckett worked perfectly. You assume Doran will leave at the end of his tenure (10 years ?). I doubt he will - what else would he do ? He is institutionalised, he has never worked outside the RSC except to stage stuff the RSC wouldn't stage (like that Michaelangelo thing with Sher at Hampstead). Even if he steps down as AD he'll still hang around.
|
|
1,119 posts
|
Post by martin1965 on Jan 24, 2018 12:11:27 GMT
I do think he will go after ten years, 2023 will mark ten years, he will be 65 that year and of course marks the anniversary of the first folio. Not sure what he might do but he will have had twenty years as either number two or AD and that is surely enough.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jan 24, 2018 13:49:46 GMT
I do think he will go after ten years, 2023 will mark ten years, he will be 65 that year and of course marks the anniversary of the first folio. Not sure what he might do but he will have had twenty years as either number two or AD and that is surely enough. They have a vacancy in the John Barton role though don’t they.
|
|
1,119 posts
|
Post by martin1965 on Jan 24, 2018 14:48:38 GMT
I do think he will go after ten years, 2023 will mark ten years, he will be 65 that year and of course marks the anniversary of the first folio. Not sure what he might do but he will have had twenty years as either number two or AD and that is surely enough. They have a vacancy in the John Barton role though don’t they. So you are Daniel Massey now?
|
|
|
Post by oxfordsimon on Jan 24, 2018 15:05:16 GMT
I do think he will go after ten years, 2023 will mark ten years, he will be 65 that year and of course marks the anniversary of the first folio. Not sure what he might do but he will have had twenty years as either number two or AD and that is surely enough. 5 more years? Please no. The RSC feels like it is sleepwalking at the moment. It needs new, dynamic leadership. And that means getting rid of Doran and Whyman.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jan 24, 2018 15:11:13 GMT
They have a vacancy in the John Barton role though don’t they. So you are Daniel Massey now? Yes. Who was I before ?
|
|
1,001 posts
|
Post by David J on Jan 24, 2018 16:16:08 GMT
I do think he will go after ten years, 2023 will mark ten years, he will be 65 that year and of course marks the anniversary of the first folio. Not sure what he might do but he will have had twenty years as either number two or AD and that is surely enough. 5 more years? Please no. The RSC feels like it is sleepwalking at the moment. It needs new, dynamic leadership. And that means getting rid of Doran and Whyman. At least the Swan still delivers some outstanding work. Even the lesser productions felt like they tried. Vice Versa last year for one was merely chuckle worthy but the energy and fun from the cast made it way better than the entire Roman season Now two of my favourite Shakespeare directors, Michael Boyd and Simon Godwin, are returning to put on shows there. And I hope Iqbal Kahn gets to spread his wings after Antony and Cleopatra. Boyd’s American production Tamburlaine gives me Henry VI vibes. Eek, hope this latest production is the same one! Otherwise I’ll just watch Troilus and Cressida at the cinema. At least it will help wash away the memory of the Wooster Group production (please, Doran)
|
|
1,119 posts
|
Post by martin1965 on Jan 24, 2018 20:32:28 GMT
I do think he will go after ten years, 2023 will mark ten years, he will be 65 that year and of course marks the anniversary of the first folio. Not sure what he might do but he will have had twenty years as either number two or AD and that is surely enough. 5 more years? Please no. The RSC feels like it is sleepwalking at the moment. It needs new, dynamic leadership. And that means getting rid of Doran and Whyman. Quite obviously not gonna happen. I happen to quite like Doran but there it is.
|
|
1,119 posts
|
Post by martin1965 on Jan 24, 2018 20:34:03 GMT
So you are Daniel Massey now? Yes. Who was I before ? Paul Scofield in what looked like JGB.
|
|
1,001 posts
|
Post by David J on Jan 24, 2018 22:40:47 GMT
5 more years? Please no. The RSC feels like it is sleepwalking at the moment. It needs new, dynamic leadership. And that means getting rid of Doran and Whyman. Quite obviously not gonna happen. I happen to quite like Doran but there it is. Some of the best Shakespeare productions I’ve seen were directed by him. But they were all before he became artistic director. He has lost his creative spark
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2018 22:46:17 GMT
I completely agree. I find it hard to write him off entirely after some of his productions I've seen, but the only one since he became AD that's been much cop (for me, at least) is Julius Caesar. He's not a terrible AD, but he needs more exciting directors, and it'd be good if his directing was more exciting again too. (Also Michael Boyd programmed SUCH good Christmas shows, why is Doran incapable of following that?)
|
|
1,001 posts
|
Post by David J on Jan 24, 2018 23:40:02 GMT
What I loved most about Gregory Doran was that in his pre-AD productions you could tell that he worked with the cast to engage with the texts and bring nearly every word to life. Nearly every actor spoke the words not just clearly but with meaning that I could fully understand and engage with
I don’t know what people felt about his Loves Labours Lost, but that was the first time I saw the play and I was quite nervous going in. I had heard that it was Shakespeare’s wordiest play and that it is difficult to understand. But Dorans Lost was one of the funniest productions I’ve ever seen.
His Midsummer Nights Dream (2008 revival) is the most magical and beautiful version of the play I’ve ever seen. Also one of the funniest (I still can’t forget Joe Dixon’s Bottom, with a full on ass’s head, performing “The ousel cock so black of hue” song like a disc jokey 😂)
I just feel he used to set out with a vision to fully realise the plays in creative ways. He isn’t as daring as Rupert Goold and Ivo Van Hove but he also endeavours to fit his vision with the text. Julius Caesar felt like Shakespeare himself had set the play in Africa. Of course the play has themes that reasonates with us today, but Doran’s production felt seamless and real
So he has done productions that were fun, creative, engaging and more important for a Shakespeare production, understandable. I would even say Richard 2 to Henry 5 has some of that. But his productions lately have become progressively literal in delivery and uninspired. King Lear is one of the dullest versions I have ever seen. It had even seeped into the Roman season when he had some very creative directors overlooking those
I may dislike the way he is running the RSC but I feel he is, or once, a director who trusts Shakespeares texts the most to find the goods to deliver
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jan 25, 2018 7:32:07 GMT
Greg Doran has always struck me as being a Shakespeare director like Peter Hall, if it's a good play it's a good production and if it's a weak play it's weak. He stays so close to the text that he lacks a bit of imagination. So for example his productions of Winters Tale, Macbeth, Hamlet, Dream were very good but Timon, Henry VIII and King John were very dull. Having that type of director as part of the team is fine if you have directors who have a different style (like Michael Boyd and Adrian Noble) but when it appears as if his style is being imposed on other directors it is a worry - of the four Roman plays three were in the Doran style.
The Doran style has been particularly exposed in the history plays which have suffered terribly in comparison to the relatively recent cycle by Boyd.
I think his casting decisions have also been poor across the entire RSC output - he is neither building a true company of lesser-known actors as Boyd did nor regularly casting top-level Shakespeare actors as his predecessors did and the result is it looks like he is just casting his mates (David Tennant, Sher, Richard Wilson etc.). It is interesting Christopher Ecclestone approached Doran about Macbeth rather than vice versa. Casting is a great skill - Michael Grandage was brilliant at it - I wonder how good Doran is at networking in the theatre industry as a whole or whether he just sits up there in Stratford in splendid isolation.
|
|
348 posts
|
Post by cirque on Jan 25, 2018 9:09:13 GMT
some interesting thoughts here.my own opinion is that Doran/Whyman have had to agree to many Arts Council impositions and,therefore,the RSC has become a political plaything rather than international Shakespeare house.Why relocate Tartuffe to Sparkhill and risk localising the work....? Seems rather odd in planning although the prospect of Boyd's Tamburlaine based on the US reviews is worth years of waiting.The obsession with young people is resulting in weak casting although maybe actors just dont want to decamp to Stratford for long periods without a London guarantee. There is a real and urgent need for groundbreaking directors to approach the plays rather than a rather limited roster and the upgrading of assistants to tackle work.If RSC is to regain status as world leader it needs to look very carefully at itself in the next year or so and question what it wants to be.It saddens me to see much better versions of Shakespeare and classical at other theatres.Greg's enthusiasm may be curtailed by Erica Whyman's agenda.Who knows...I am not in the RSC corridors of debate but sense dissatisfaction with the state of play.
|
|
|
Post by Honoured Guest on Jan 25, 2018 12:08:14 GMT
I saw A Christmas Carol last week and absolutely loved it, so I'm glad it's returning. It says on the 10th December performance that it will be filmed, so does anyone know if that means it will be released or just filmed for archives? I can't imagine it will be a RSC Live broadcast as it isn't Shakespeare. If you click on "this performance will be filmed" it appears it will be for cinema broadcast This performance will be filmed for broadcast to cinemas. There will be cameras in the auditorium although, unless stated, these shouldn’t interrupt your view. If so it seems odd for the cinema broadcast performance to be the day before press night! In the printed brochure, there's nothing about filming or a broadcast of AChristmas Carol. But it states that the Writer & Director Talk on 10 December at 5.15-6PM will be live streamed online.
|
|
1,845 posts
|
Post by NeilVHughes on Feb 12, 2018 14:38:41 GMT
Troilus and Timon booked along with Tartuffe and Tamburlaine. Convenient schedule, able to do them over two Saturdays and take in the unwrapped sessions as well.
Bonus this will complete my Shakespeare plays, after missing the Russell Beale Timon this has evaded me ever since.
(Is there a collective term for completists?) [polite please]
|
|
|
Post by waybeyondblue on Feb 12, 2018 20:34:33 GMT
Troilus and Timon booked along with Tartuffe and Tamburlaine. Convenient schedule, able to do them over two Saturdays and take in the unwrapped sessions as well. Bonus this will complete my Shakespeare plays, after missing the Russell Beale Timon this has evaded me ever since. (Is there a collective term for completists?) [polite please] “Billend”
|
|
5,582 posts
|
Post by lynette on Feb 13, 2018 13:23:35 GMT
Troilus and Timon booked along with Tartuffe and Tamburlaine. Convenient schedule, able to do them over two Saturdays and take in the unwrapped sessions as well. Bonus this will complete my Shakespeare plays, after missing the Russell Beale Timon this has evaded me ever since. (Is there a collective term for completists?) [polite please] “Billend” 😂
|
|
277 posts
|
Post by fossil on Feb 23, 2018 19:39:11 GMT
From the Stratford Herald website dated 21 Feb 2018.
"The RSC has been working with a household name on an exciting new project for 2019. The company had wanted to keep any details secret until early next year – but the star’s agents accidentally let the cat out of the bag…. Find out the full story in tomorrow’s Stratford Herald."
Nothing further on the web site. Does anyone have more information on this?
|
|
37 posts
|
Post by johng on Feb 23, 2018 20:38:02 GMT
"David Walliams to work with RSC on new musical" is the headline
You can link to the front page through their twitter feed
|
|