2,976 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Feb 20, 2018 18:31:02 GMT
how Columbo is going to uncover that truth Yes - he's based on the eccentric Porfiry in Crime and Punishment. I think the very first episode directly refers to it. (More John Simm in the BBC's version, btw, worth watching if you haven't - and one of Ian McDiarmid's rare TV appearances as Porfiry.)
|
|
5,599 posts
|
Post by lynette on Feb 20, 2018 19:02:26 GMT
Is it me or is this becoming a bit preachy? I mean that soldier could have floored that bloke in an instant and he would never dare say a word. Would he? I mean she has on him as much as he might have on her. Or am I just naive? Enlighten me. And the pole jumping thing had better have a payoff. I’m expecting a leap across Tower Bridge at the very least.
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Feb 20, 2018 20:07:38 GMT
Is it me or is this becoming a bit preachy? I mean that soldier could have floored that bloke in an instant and he would never dare say a word. Would he? I mean she has on him as much as he might have on her. Or am I just naive? Enlighten me. And the pole jumping thing had better have a payoff. I’m expecting a leap across Tower Bridge at the very least. I assumed the implication was his rank would protect him as the army would close rank? But yes i'm sorry unless she'd won the Olympics and then her pole had snapped whilst doing a demo over the thames which random person would recognise her? Lynette I do like your suggestion.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2018 21:00:39 GMT
It's all very contrived, isn't it? And there are so many fabulous actors that none of them gets much screen time at all really.
|
|
4,682 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Jan on Feb 21, 2018 9:15:41 GMT
Not watching this but interested to see Sir David Hare accused of misogyny for including graphic scenes of violence against women and a shower-based scene of gratuitous female nudity. Anyone feel that ? Reminds me of a character in a novel (I forget which) who's a screen writer who says "When I want to see a naked actress I just write it into the script".
|
|
2,976 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Feb 21, 2018 10:16:30 GMT
Sir David Hare accused of misogyny for including graphic scenes of violence against women and a shower-based scene of gratuitous female nudity. Anyone feel that ? Actually, no - and I'm generally one who kicks off about that (I detested the new Blade Runner for it, switch off any crime dramas that start with a pretty woman being brutally killed, and it put me off Game of Thrones for ages, until the cast and bigger dragons tempted me back). The shower scene didn't seem very sexualised, and neither was the rape. The director is actually a woman, though I didn't realise this because she uses gender-neutral initials rather than her full name.
|
|
4,682 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Jan on Feb 21, 2018 10:20:55 GMT
Sir David Hare accused of misogyny for including graphic scenes of violence against women and a shower-based scene of gratuitous female nudity. Anyone feel that ? Actually, no - and I'm generally one who kicks off about that (I detested the new Blade Runner for it ..... Interestingly I detested the original Blade Runner for it too but I was in a minority of one at the time.
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Feb 21, 2018 11:51:55 GMT
Would agree with crowblack, had to think a while to even remember the shower scene so clearly didn't bother me. I'd say they were both less is more types of filming.
|
|
2,976 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Feb 21, 2018 11:52:39 GMT
detested the original Blade Runner for it too Objectified (and more often than not, naked) women was part-and-parcel of almost all SF back then, sadly - but I was very surprised that it was still there in 2017. Women had much stronger roles in mid 20thc noir than in the 21st!
|
|
5,599 posts
|
Post by lynette on Feb 21, 2018 17:44:51 GMT
He set up the shower scene with the description of the friend's bits blasted all over and into her hair etc. Very graphic I thought and possibly didn’t need the little flash back to the actual event. I don’t think you can accuse Hare of Mysogyny, that just ignores his whole oeuvre and him as a person.
|
|
857 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by bordeaux on Feb 25, 2018 10:41:36 GMT
Not watching this but interested to see Sir David Hare accused of misogyny for including graphic scenes of violence against women and a shower-based scene of gratuitous female nudity. Anyone feel that ? Reminds me of a character in a novel (I forget which) who's a screen writer who says "When I want to see a naked actress I just write it into the script". Accused by whom, I wonder? The sort of people who are every week condemning misogyny, two seconds of female nudity and violence against women on screen or people who only do it when a left-wing playwright is involved? The accusation doesn't stand up - showing violence against women is not misogyny - and given the amount of such violence in the endless TV police dramas no one could accuse Hare of being a major offender. The accusation reminds me of something Michael Foot said to Jeremy Thorpe (quoting something someone said about Byron): they pretend to hate your morals but they really hate your politics. I watched the first two episodes on catch-up last night and was very impressed (and a little surprised - I thought his last TV outing, the trio with Bill Nighy, was over-praised). It is complex and twisty but he always seems in control of the material: it really works as gripping story-telling. Amazing cast too.
|
|
2,976 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Feb 25, 2018 20:50:54 GMT
Actor playing the dodgy army officer in Collateral has just turned up as a dodgy army officer in Endeavour...
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Feb 26, 2018 22:06:44 GMT
Was that it? The pole vaulting pay off?
|
|
492 posts
|
Post by wiggymess on Feb 27, 2018 16:21:57 GMT
Ugh.
So glad there's only 1 episode remaining of this. Ep 1 I really enjoyed and recommended to everyone. Ep 2 grated on me quite a bit (it's totally fine that 2 of the "bad guy goons" were sat in their car right outside the crime scene with police walking right past them.
But ep3 was laughably bad imo. Awful, jarring exposition throughout.
The scene between the bloke vicar and the woman vicar in particular. I live with a man. I know you do. I know you know.
And after all the interesting talk on here about whether it was gratuitous nudity on a previous episode and whether it could be justified etc, this week ... really?? Completely undermines the themes of that plotline surely.
Ugh.
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Feb 27, 2018 16:26:47 GMT
Was that it? The pole vaulting pay off? ...and right there on her phone when she needed it. Wish I could find what I'm looking for that quickly. Ugh. So glad there's only 1 episode remaining of this. Ep 1 I really enjoyed and recommended to everyone. Ep 2 grated on me quite a bit (it's totally fine that 2 of the "bad guy goons" were sat in their car right outside the crime scene with police walking right past them. But ep3 was laughably bad imo. Awful, jarring exposition throughout.Agree. It's awful. Does Billie Piper know how to do anything with her hands other than point a finger in someone's face? I cannot believe the ridiculous reason for the original killing. The whole thing's just daft now.
|
|
2,976 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 5, 2018 21:50:55 GMT
10 mins to go - will they bond over the pole vaulting incident?
|
|
2,976 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 5, 2018 21:55:29 GMT
Well, zero marks for technique there.
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Mar 5, 2018 22:11:00 GMT
Eh? What was all that about? After such a good first episode that was a complete load of nonsensical horse's excrement.
Who was the bloke Carey Mulligan went and spoke to briefly who complained she'd woken him up? Had we seen him before?
What did nasty rapist bloke have over Sandrine? Did they ever tell us?
What was the point of John Simm or Billy Piper? Or even Nicola Walker (despite the fact I think she's fab.)
Ach. Can't be bothered to even think any more about it.
ETA (even though I 'm not thinking about it any more.....) The jury's still out re Carey. I still wish it had been Keeley.
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Mar 5, 2018 22:22:37 GMT
I assumed maybe it was her fella? She had a second phone and she'd called the smuggler dude so think it was that you have a point re those characters It did rather steadily descend didn't it but had rather accepted that by episode 2. am sure the police would have gone round and told Deborah Findlay rather than ringing her up wouldn't they?
I too was holding out for some pole vaulting involving last moment that never came. sigh.
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Mar 5, 2018 22:36:11 GMT
I assumed maybe it was her fella? I don't think so because she suggested he get back to his woman "or man" upstairs before she left! Never mind - I'm just glad it wasn't only me who couldn't keep up!
|
|
2,976 posts
|
Post by crowblack on Mar 5, 2018 22:36:55 GMT
A waste of a good cast and several hours of time! It never really managed to be engaging - lots of characters, but we never got to learn much about them and never really got to care. The soldier character was potentially interesting but even that plotline was underdeveloped, and that closing scene with her was bizarre - Mulligan's character has gone all that way to try to talk down a potential suicide, and needlessly, fatally tells her the man she shot wasn't the dangerous man she believed?
|
|
2,389 posts
|
Post by peggs on Mar 5, 2018 22:41:45 GMT
I assumed maybe it was her fella? I don't think so because she suggested he get back to his woman "or man" upstairs before she left! Never mind - I'm just glad it wasn't only me who couldn't keep up! Oh sorry, didn't read what you'd actually written, that was the journalist, I think episode 1 he was lurking around after a story and was who John Heffernan was feeding dud info to. I thought you meant who was speaking to on the phone in the car (although you would have had to write whole different words for that to be true).
|
|
5,599 posts
|
Post by lynette on Mar 5, 2018 22:46:49 GMT
Eh? What was all that about? After such a good first episode that was a complete load of nonsensical horse's excrement. Who was the bloke Carey Mulligan went and spoke to briefly who complained she'd woken him up? Had we seen him before? What did nasty rapist bloke have over Sandrine? Did they ever tell us? What was the point of John Simm or Billy Piper? Or even Nicola Walker (despite the fact I think she's fab.) Ach. Can't be bothered to even think any more about it. ETA (even though I 'm not thinking about it any more.....) The jury's still out re Carey. I still wish it had been Keeley. The bloke was a journalist who was putting story in the newspapers who got the stuff from the MI5 bloke who got it from the sidekick policeman. No? What the rapist had on Sandrine...missed that unless it was her general shakiness after coming back. The vicar story and the MP story did connect but it might have had a better structure if he had written connecting dramas with each one's story much amplified in separate plays. Tell me how come the two baddies were kept together on way to station and in station? Since when do you tell a woman her daughter has shot herself on the phone? Short of actors were they for a visiting policewoman? And that poor kid who won’t see her daddy until they go to court. As for what it was all about, well it was all about Hare venting his political credentials. I think Hare was relying on the actors here. They fleshed out the cliche ridden dialogue.
|
|
492 posts
|
Post by wiggymess on Mar 5, 2018 22:59:50 GMT
Glad that's over. Sucked in by episode 1.
At times it felt like A Touch Of Cloth mixed with that rubbish Ballot Monkeys show (I had to google the name) especially the scene with the Labour leader. Anyone else find the irony of her shouting 'I don't want ambiguity!' hilarious?
Also found the last scene with the solider just ridiculous. She lied about giving 2 people citizenship but couldn't lie about the guy having been a terrorist. Man alive...
And I have NO idea what the Piper/Simm plotline was!
|
|
2,302 posts
|
Post by Tibidabo on Mar 5, 2018 23:02:59 GMT
The bloke was a journalist who was putting story in the newspapers who got the stuff from the MI5 bloke who got it from the sidekick policeman. Ah thanks! (not that I remember him.. ) It's finally happened - I've turned into the granny in the corner constantly interrupting asking "Which one's that?" "Wasn't he married to the other one in the last episode?" "Why do they all look alike?" (Which reminds me of a Spanish series I was watching once and got to episode 6 before I realised there were actually three dark haired blokes with moustaches, not two!) Oh well. Some good acting at least.
|
|
475 posts
|
Post by Deal J on Mar 6, 2018 7:09:35 GMT
The journalist was played by Mark Umbers from Merrily We Roll Along. Very stagey in terms of cast, but the plot was all over the place. I'm very pleased to learn I'm not the only one that was left a confused.
My husband thought they were just setting up for a second series, but I doubt they'd get that cast back together. Personally I don't think it warrants a second series.
|
|
9 posts
|
Post by bacon on Mar 6, 2018 8:24:55 GMT
It was like a Formula 1 race that had to be stopped because all of the cars just slowly ran out of fuel. Every storyline withering-away into tension-free irrelevance. I'm guessing all the name actors signed-up after only reading the first episode. At least us theatre-fans got *something* out of it, Lord knows what enjoyment - if any - the rest of the country gleaned from their 4 hour investment.
|
|
492 posts
|
Post by wiggymess on Mar 6, 2018 9:08:51 GMT
It was like a Formula 1 race that had to be stopped because all of the cars just slowly ran out of fuel. Every storyline withering-away into tension-free irrelevance. I'm guessing all the name actors signed-up after only reading the first episode. At least us theatre-fans got *something* out of it, Lord knows what enjoyment - if any - the rest of the country gleaned from their 4 hour investment. That's right, all the plot lines started with such potential and then just fell flat. The scene with the soldier's wife in the kitchen and the garage - there was absolutely NO tension in that scene whatsoever, despite the (presumably last straw) attempt to build it up with slightly dramatic music. I'm going to go back to my State Of Play boxset - now that was a series. This was a very poor imitation of that. Nathaniel Martello-White was great though
|
|
4,973 posts
|
Post by TallPaul on Mar 6, 2018 10:34:50 GMT
Quite apart from all the above, one minute Berna was in a high-rise glass tower, she started walking down a glass staircase and, by the time she reached the bottom, she was in a low-rise brick building on a cul-de-sac.
Nice to see the CAA building on Kingsway, though.
I did wonder if I had spent too long looking at the architecture, but it seems not!
|
|
5,599 posts
|
Post by lynette on Mar 6, 2018 13:49:58 GMT
Please go over to the general section for questions on Cormoron Strike series.
|
|