3,070 posts
|
Post by Rory on Feb 7, 2024 15:23:05 GMT
Saw the first preview last night. A producer announced from the stage that one of the actors had taken ill, so the understudy was going on without having had a rehearsal. But props to him because I had no idea who it was untill the end when he got his own bow. He blended right in. I know it was the first preview, but overall I don't think the production worked for me. I think this was in large part to do with the music, but also the setting. I have seen a modern version before, but something about this didn't ring true for me. I just couldn't get into it fully. I did see huge potential with all the mordrn day references. I don't know of it's the right word but it felt gimmicky as if a lot of the text/story was rushed over to get to the big moment of the town hall, and to be fair it was worth going for that alone, Matt Smith was particularly great here, especially as it was the first show. But over all I just could not get invested, I didn't care enough. I did enjoy it, as it is a good play and the acting is really good. I particularly like the dynamic between Dr stockman and his brother (Paul Hilton I believe). I just felt the production did the text a disservice in that it could have been a fantastic commentary on where we are at as a society, but apart from Matt's speech, I felt I didn't get that. I may eat my words when the production settles into the run and I hope I do. The music was a big no no from me, but I did see people bopping their heads, so it might be just me. Please feel free to hide a spoiler but what was the extent of the audience participation? Do you have to join in?
|
|
|
Post by lookingatthestars on Feb 7, 2024 15:40:51 GMT
Apologies, for some reason I can't get the spoiler button, to work. I'll try again.
|
|
|
Post by lookingatthestars on Feb 7, 2024 22:32:25 GMT
The town hall scene
|
|
|
Post by lookingatthestars on Feb 7, 2024 22:37:23 GMT
Oh dear, my spoiler disappeared. I'm sure by the time I figure out what's going on with my technical issues, somebody who has seen it will provide the spoiler for the town hall scene. I liked what they did, high point of the evening for me.
|
|
|
Post by mprlibre on Feb 7, 2024 22:53:37 GMT
I work at the Broadway production of this play, which begins previews later this month, and we’ve already had people ask to return tickets because they thought it was the West End production. Am wondering how often if at all that will happen the other way round!
|
|
115 posts
|
Post by alexandra on Feb 7, 2024 22:55:25 GMT
Ostermeier was on Radio 4 with Matt Smith this morning, and commented that ticket prices were 5 times as much here as they had been in Germany. The producers can’t have been too delighted with him for that. The only thing I remember about it is the town hall scene, which went on for ages and was certainly remarkable.
|
|
|
Post by thistimetomorrow on Feb 7, 2024 23:34:29 GMT
I work at the Broadway production of this play, which begins previews later this month, and we’ve already had people ask to return tickets because they thought it was the West End production. Am wondering how often if at all that will happen the other way round! I actually got an ad for the Broadway production today and was just thinking if I didn't know any better I could've booked for the wrong country!
|
|
93 posts
|
Post by mrbluesky on Feb 8, 2024 7:24:22 GMT
Saw this last night.
It’s a confusing piece (or at least was for me!) - parts of it really work - Stockmann’s speech, the dynamics between Smith and Paul Hilton for example, but there are bits of it that REALLY didn’t work for me - the town hall scene goes on for too long, and, in my opinion, doesn’t add anything to the show for a start.
It’s a shame, as I wanted to love this, but it just left me cold. I’d say it’s a 2 star production, pushed up to 3 by some really great performances, particularly from Smith and Hilton.
|
|
|
Post by lookingatthestars on Feb 9, 2024 1:36:14 GMT
Saw the first preview last night. A producer announced from the stage that one of the actors had taken ill, so the understudy was going on without having had a rehearsal. But props to him because I had no idea who it was untill the end when he got his own bow. He blended right in. I know it was the first preview, but overall I don't think the production worked for me. I think this was in large part to do with the music, but also the setting. I have seen a modern version before, but something about this didn't ring true for me. I just couldn't get into it fully. I did see huge potential with all the mordrn day references. I don't know of it's the right word but it felt gimmicky as if a lot of the text/story was rushed over to get to the big moment of the town hall, and to be fair it was worth going for that alone, Matt Smith was particularly great here, especially as it was the first show. But over all I just could not get invested, I didn't care enough. I did enjoy it, as it is a good play and the acting is really good. I particularly like the dynamic between Dr stockman and his brother (Paul Hilton I believe). I just felt the production did the text a disservice in that it could have been a fantastic commentary on where we are at as a society, but apart from Matt's speech, I felt I didn't get that. I may eat my words when the production settles into the run and I hope I do. The music was a big no no from me, but I did see people bopping their heads, so it might be just me. Please feel free to hide a spoiler but what was the extent of the audience participation? Do you have to join in? Spoiler for the town hall scene {Spoiler - click to view} After Dr Stockman's speech, the audiece are asked for a show of hands if you had agreed with him. Then you asked if you did put up your hand would you like to explain why you agree with him. There are FOH on every level with microphones waiting. I think about 6 people spoke on the night I was there. I could see more with hands up who never got a chance to speak, so looks like no shortage of participants
|
|
6,317 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Jon on Feb 9, 2024 1:49:18 GMT
I want to know: What the responses were like? I imagine fairly tame but I could envision someone getting a bit carried away
|
|
27 posts
|
Post by shakeel on Feb 9, 2024 14:56:26 GMT
How long is this, roughly?
|
|
5,586 posts
|
Post by lynette on Feb 9, 2024 18:25:31 GMT
Please feel free to hide a spoiler but what was the extent of the audience participation? Do you have to join in? Spoiler for the town hall scene {Spoiler - click to view} After Dr Stockman's speech, the audiece are asked for a show of hands if you had agreed with him. Then you asked if you did put up your hand would you like to explain why you agree with him. There are FOH on every level with microphones waiting. I think about 6 people spoke on the night I was there. I could see more with hands up who never got a chance to speak, so looks like no shortage of participants I’m shuddering; it sounds like BBC Question Time.
|
|
27 posts
|
Post by shakeel on Feb 9, 2024 22:35:50 GMT
How long is this, roughly? Answering my own Q: it finished at 9.50pm tonight, so about 2h20. First act finished at 8.50ish. Not sure how I feel about it. The town hall scene is… interesting.
|
|
27 posts
|
Post by shakeel on Feb 9, 2024 22:40:43 GMT
I have a feeling the town hall scene uses plants. It all felt a bit too perfect? Ours had someone who opened with “as someone with a degree in philosophy”, followed by an antivaxxer who referred to Matt as Matt.
I think the whole scene doesn’t work that well because the audience is overwhelmingly (and imo a bit uncritically) on Stockmann’s side. The rest of the play just doesn’t make much sense after that? And there’s nothing particularly interesting about a play telling an audience exactly what they want to hear.
|
|
|
Post by blaxx on Feb 10, 2024 5:29:01 GMT
I don't think the audience participation in the town hall scene is a spoiler, a lot of productions use this approach.
I'm bummed to hear it's not very good, I had high expectations for it. Maybe the NYC version will be better.
|
|
1,196 posts
|
Post by Steve on Feb 10, 2024 23:07:19 GMT
Saw this tonight, enjoyed a lot of it, especially everything Paul Hilton related. Some spoilers follow. . . The set in the first half is some kind of Brechtian thing, hard lit despite no visible skylight, with all sorts of revolutionary graffiti on the walls, the least appealing of which was an exhortation to kill the Buddha (too chill I suppose). The blocking also doesn't lend itself to a believable intimacy among the characters some of the time. I recall how lovely the intimacy was in Jessica Brown Findlay's Hamlet, where she played Ophelia opposite Andrew Scott, and the two of them together just won my heart. Could have used a bit more believable humanity, a bit less Brecht, as I feel you've got to really buy the humanity before it gets threatened by the plot, even if you suddenly go Brechtian later (which it does, very effectively). On that human note, I really loved Vilberg Andri Palsson, standing in for the indisposed Zachary Hart as Billing, a character I haven't really paid attention to in the past: his earphones-on, gentle, vacant, morally-malleable long-hair was spot on recognisable from every student common room everywhere lol. I like music, and the live music did serve to humanise the characters somewhat, even as it slowed down the plot. I wished Matt Smith would sing his "American Psycho" numbers instead though, but that's just me (I loved that production so much lol!) This production has an embarrassment of good acting talent, so Nigel Lindsay as a capitalist ghoul and Priyanka Burford as a compromised liberal are good fun. But it's Paul Hilton's antagonist, Peter Stockmann, who really stood out for me: the weaselly gelatinous jibbering of a Jacob Rees Mogg contained beneath a steely, aggressive Dominic Raab surface. Hilton makes every scene he's in come alive, regardless of the staging. Matt Smith rules in the second half, especially when he gets Hulk angry. Never having attended a political event, it makes me realise why people do it, the lure and electricity of being shouted at. Anyhow, against a witty comment from a probable plant, many members of the audience did pipe up in the interactive bit, which used mics, and involved comments from all areas of the theatre. I know they were real cos they failed to address what speech they were actually reacting to, and just got indignant about the plot instead. The Duke of York is probably a bit too boxy and claustrophobic for really exciting staging involving audiences. I remember how, at Chichester, Hugh Bonneville got quite a work-out running up and down those broad, diagonal aisles, visible to all. But even if he is constrained physically, Smith nails the emotions. Anyhow, I think this will bed into a 4 star show, but at this early stage, it's more like 3 and a half stars. PS: The front 3 rows (AA, BB, A) got given Macintoshes in the interval to protect them from possible (washable) paint splashes. There weren't any major splashes tonight, but there could have been.
|
|
5,276 posts
|
Post by mrbarnaby on Feb 10, 2024 23:09:40 GMT
Paul Hilton really never puts a foot wrong. And steals every show he’s in. What a star
|
|
6,317 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Jon on Feb 10, 2024 23:10:54 GMT
Saw this tonight, enjoyed a lot of it, especially everything Paul Hilton related. Some spoilers follow. . . The set in the first half is some kind of Brechtian thing, hard lit despite no visible skylight, with all sorts of revolutionary graffiti on the walls, the least appealing of which was an exhortation to kill the Buddha (too chill I suppose). The blocking also doesn't lend itself to a believable intimacy among the characters some of the time. I recall how lovely the intimacy was in Jessica Brown Findlay's Hamlet, where she played Ophelia opposite Andrew Scott, and the two of them together just won my heart. Could have used a bit more believable humanity, a bit less Brecht, as I feel you've got to really buy the humanity before it gets threatened by the plot, even if you suddenly go Brechtian later (which it does, very effectively). On that human note, I really loved Vilberg Andri Palsson, standing in for the indisposed Zachary Hart as Billing, a character I haven't really paid attention to in the past: his earphones-on, gentle, vacant, morally-malleable long-hair was spot on recognisable from every student common room everywhere lol. I like music, and the live music did serve to humanise the characters somewhat, even as it slowed down the plot. I wished Matt Smith would sing his "American Psycho" numbers instead though, but that's just me (I loved that production so much lol!) This production has an embarrassment of good acting talent, so Nigel Lindsay as a capitalist ghoul and Priyanka Burford as a compromised liberal are good fun. But it's Paul Hilton's antagonist, Peter Stockmann, who really stood out for me: the weaselly gelatinous jibbering of a Jacob Rees Mogg contained beneath a steely, aggressive Dominic Raab surface. Hilton makes every scene he's in come alive, regardless of the staging. Matt Smith rules in the second half, especially when he gets Hulk angry. Never having attended a political event, it makes me realise why people do it, the lure and electricity of being shouted at. Anyhow, against a witty comment from a probable plant, many members of the audience did pipe up in the interactive bit, which used mics, and involved comments from all areas of the theatre. I know they were real cos they failed to address what speech they were actually reacting to, and just got indignant about the plot instead. Anyhow, I think this will bed into a 4 star show, but at this early stage, it's more like 3 and a half stars. What was the witty comment? You can put it in spoilers if you like.
|
|
1,196 posts
|
Post by Steve on Feb 10, 2024 23:23:45 GMT
What was the witty comment? You can put it in spoilers if you like. Railing against the price of tickets and asking for refunds for everyone.
A person who actually paid for a ticket would hardly start that sort of thing, as it's a confession he's a mug lol
|
|
|
Post by nottobe on Feb 11, 2024 9:27:54 GMT
I went to see this last night and enjoyed it but it wasn't perfect. I personally am always interested when productions class themselves as 're-imagined' and especially when it is slightly avant-garde European productions.
This story is really one that is still as persistent as when it was first written. I enjoyed Matt Smiths performance here more than him in Lungs and felt he held the play together well. I enjoyed the rest of the cast too but some of them felt a bit under utilised like Nigel Lindsay and even Jessica Brown Findlay.
I personally felt like the audience participation scene did not add anything to this production. From what I was gauging, as it is a piece of fiction an audience don't care too much about voicing their opinion or elaborating on it too much. It is not a real life story so the stakes are really not that high. That is not the fault of the audience at all but it felt like the director wants it to be a moment that probably won't happen across the whole of the run. It is always going to be a room full of more left leaning people who just want to sit and watch a play, not be asked questions.
I think this would have worked more as a 90 minute straight through play and cut the non needed music sections. Why did they need to be a band ?
But despite these comments I did enjoy my time and had an engaging night out.
|
|
4,562 posts
|
Post by Mark on Feb 17, 2024 17:36:28 GMT
I won the front row lottery today. Thought the whole thing was excellent. Stage is fairly high but don’t feel I missed much.
Didn’t know the play at all, so it was all new to me, but I all just worked so well for me. Highly recommend
|
|
|
Post by dip on Feb 19, 2024 8:50:42 GMT
Saw this Saturday afternoon and adored it.
|
|
61 posts
|
Post by demonbarber on Feb 19, 2024 15:50:12 GMT
Hi all, have put it in the Noticeboard but realise that doesn't always get read. Have 1x stalls ticket (C3) for An Enemy of the People, sold out this evening, 19/02. Paid £43.80 but open to offers. Drop me a message if interested!
|
|
|
Post by bigredapple on Feb 19, 2024 23:09:49 GMT
Has anyone won a single lottery seat for this?
I always enter for just 1 ticket and haven’t won
Wondering if I’d have more luck trying for 2, as I’ve read some rush tickets won’t give you 1 but will give you 2
|
|
1,197 posts
|
Post by theatrefan77 on Feb 20, 2024 0:52:48 GMT
I loved it, it's a great play and the update to modern times works really well. The acting is really top notch, particularly Matt Smith and Paul Hilton.
|
|
4,562 posts
|
Post by Mark on Feb 20, 2024 5:08:59 GMT
Has anyone won a single lottery seat for this? I always enter for just 1 ticket and haven’t won Wondering if I’d have more luck trying for 2, as I’ve read some rush tickets won’t give you 1 but will give you 2 Yes, on my first attempt for the Saturday matinee. Seemed at least another 3-4 solo winners in the front row when I went too.
|
|
|
Post by alessia on Feb 20, 2024 7:07:13 GMT
Really liked this! I have never seen the play before, but I loved this adaptation, a lot of random details involving the audience which I won’t spoil but I was in second row and at some point things got … interesting 😅also really liked how it was staged. *spoiler* (please add bc I can’t!) my friend insisted that the people speaking from the audience were all actors, because they were too articulate. I don’t think so?? I loved most of this maybe except for the choice of song when they all sang together in the first act (oasis, really??) apart from this small detail I loved this. The programme is expensive but it’s much more substantial than the average flyer you get these days and is worth the price for a change.
|
|
|
Post by blaxx on Feb 20, 2024 7:50:09 GMT
Really liked this! I have never seen the play before, but I loved this adaptation, a lot of random details involving the audience which I won’t spoil but I was in second row and at some point things got … interesting 😅also really liked how it was staged. *spoiler* (please add bc I can’t!) my friend insisted that the people speaking from the audience were all actors, because they were too articulate. I don’t think so?? I loved most of this maybe except for the choice of song when they all sang together in the first act (oasis, really??) apart from this small detail I loved this. The programme is expensive but it’s much more substantial than the average flyer you get these days and is worth the price for a change. They're not actors 🤣 And this is a very good staging of the play, though I must say it had more humor than other productions I've seen, which was refreshing. I feel awful for whoever has to reset that mess between performances.
|
|
|
Post by dip on Feb 20, 2024 7:50:49 GMT
Really liked this! I have never seen the play before, but I loved this adaptation, a lot of random details involving the audience which I won’t spoil but I was in second row and at some point things got … interesting 😅also really liked how it was staged. *spoiler* (please add bc I can’t!) my friend insisted that the people speaking from the audience were all actors, because they were too articulate. I don’t think so?? I loved most of this maybe except for the choice of song when they all sang together in the first act (oasis, really??) apart from this small detail I loved this. The programme is expensive but it’s much more substantial than the average flyer you get these days and is worth the price for a change. They definitely aren't all actors. We had a woman get tied up over her words and ending up saying something to the effect of 'people from council houses commit more crimes'. Saw her as we were leaving and she was desperately looking for reassurance from other punters. I think maybe there are a couple of plants in the crowd just to get things rolling though.
|
|
|
Post by alessia on Feb 20, 2024 9:18:31 GMT
Thanks for confirming that I was right 😂 I’m going to let him know/ I think last night we had particularly well spoken - articulate people in the audience !!
|
|